Centre for Workplace Health, HSE's Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN, UK.
Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Jan;92(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1359-7. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
In the 30 years since the Stockholm Workshop Scale (SWS) was published, the scientific literature on hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) has grown and experience has been gained in its practical application. This research was undertaken to develop an up-to-date evidence-based classification for HAVS by seeking consensus between experts in the field.
Seven occupational physicians who are clinically active and have had work published on HAVS in the last 10 years were asked to independently take part in a three-round iterative Delphi process. Consensus was taken when 5/7 (72%) agreed with a particular statement. Experts were asked to provide evidence from the literature or data from their own research to support their views.
Consensus was achieved for most of the questions that were used to develop an updated staging system for HAVS. The vascular and neurological components from the SWS are retained, but ambiguous descriptors and tests without adequately developed methodology such as tactile discrimination, or discriminating power such as grip strength, are not included in the new staging system. A blanching score taken from photographs of the hands during vasospastic episodes is recommended in place of self-recall and frequency of attacks to stage vascular HAVS. Methods with the best evidence base are described for assessing sensory perception and dexterity.
A new classification has been developed with three stages for the clinical classification of vascular and neurological HAVS based on international consensus. We recommend it replaces the SWS for clinical and research purposes.
自《斯德哥尔摩研讨会量表》(SWS)发表以来的 30 年中,有关手部振动综合征(HAVS)的科学文献不断增加,并且在其实际应用中积累了经验。本研究旨在通过寻求该领域专家的共识,为 HAVS 制定最新的循证分类。
七位在职职业医生,在过去 10 年中在 HAVS 相关领域发表过工作成果,被要求独立参与三轮迭代 Delphi 流程。当 5/7(72%)位专家同意某一特定陈述时,即达成共识。专家们被要求从文献中提供证据,或从自己的研究中提供数据来支持他们的观点。
为了开发一个更新的 HAVS 分期系统,提出的大多数问题都达成了共识。保留了 SWS 的血管和神经成分,但新的分期系统不包括描述不明确的标准和方法学尚未充分发展的测试,如触觉辨别力或握力等辨别力。建议使用血管性 HAVS 发作期间手部血管痉挛时拍摄的照片来记录白瘢评分,以替代自我回忆和发作频率来分期。描述了用于评估感觉知觉和灵巧性的具有最佳证据基础的方法。
基于国际共识,制定了一种新的分类方法,将 HAVS 的血管和神经临床表现分为三个阶段。我们建议用新的分类方法代替 SWS 用于临床和研究目的。