Suppr超能文献

胸腹部创伤CT中厚层与薄层图像的比较:一项回顾性分析

Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Guchlerner Leon, Wichmann Julian Lukas, Tischendorf Patricia, Albrecht Moritz, Vogl Thomas Josef, Wutzler Sebastian, Ackermann Hanns, Eichler Katrin, Frellesen Claudia

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institut fuer Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Clinic of the Goethe University, Haus 23C UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic of the Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1021-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare thick (5 mm) and thin slice images (1.5 mm) of lung, soft tissue, and bone window in thoracoabdominal trauma computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

167 Patients that underwent thoracoabdominal trauma CT between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. CT data were reconstructed in a transverse direction with 5 mm and 1.5 mm slice images of lung, soft tissue, and bone window. Two blinded raters (radiologists) evaluated the collected data by detecting predefined injuries in different organ areas. Reconstruction and evaluation times as well as detected injuries were noted and compared.

RESULTS

Reconstruction and evaluation times were significantly higher with 1.5 mm thin-slice images, and the effect strength according to Rosenthal displayed a strong effect of 0.61 (< 0.1 small effect, 0.3 middle effect, and > 0.5 strong effect). Average evaluation time differences were 62.7 s (33.9 s-91.5 s) in bone window between 1.5 mm and 3 mm for rater 1 (p < 0.001) and 71.4 s (43.1 s-99.7 s) for rater 2 (p < 0.001). Average time differences between 1.5 mm and 5 mm were 68,7 s (43.9 s-93.5 s) for rater 1 and 75.3 s (44.7 s-105.9 s) for rater 2 in lung window (p < 0.001) and 66.6 s (28.8 s-104.4 s) for rater 1 and 114 s (74.4 s-153.6 s) for rater 2 in soft-tissue window (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding soft-tissue and lung injuries, except non-significant improvement in the detection of bone fractures.

CONCLUSION

Thin-slice images do not bring any significant benefit in thoracoabdominal trauma CT of soft-tissue and lung injuries, but they can be helpful for the diagnosis of bone fractures and incidental findings.

摘要

目的

比较胸腹部创伤计算机断层扫描中肺、软组织和骨窗的厚层(5毫米)和薄层图像(1.5毫米)。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2014年11月至2015年12月期间接受胸腹部创伤CT检查的167例患者。CT数据在横断面上重建为肺、软组织和骨窗的5毫米和1.5毫米薄层图像。两名盲法评估者(放射科医生)通过检测不同器官区域的预定义损伤来评估收集到的数据。记录并比较重建和评估时间以及检测到的损伤情况。

结果

1.5毫米薄层图像的重建和评估时间显著更长,根据罗森塔尔效应强度显示出0.61的强效应(<0.1为小效应,0.3为中等效应,>0.5为强效应)。评估者1在骨窗中1.5毫米和3毫米之间的平均评估时间差异为62.7秒(33.9秒 - 91.5秒)(p<0.001),评估者2为71.4秒(43.1秒 - 99.7秒)(p<0.001)。在肺窗中,评估者1在1.5毫米和5毫米之间的平均时间差异为68.7秒(43.9秒 - 93.5秒),评估者2为75.3秒(44.7秒 - 105.9秒)(p<0.001);在软组织窗中,评估者1为66.6秒(28.8秒 - 104.4秒),评估者2为114秒(74.4秒 - 153.6秒)(p<0.001)。除了在骨折检测方面有不显著的改善外,软组织和肺损伤方面没有显著差异。

结论

在胸腹部创伤CT中,薄层图像在软组织和肺损伤方面没有带来任何显著益处,但它们有助于骨折诊断和偶然发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验