Guillamondegui Oscar D, Mahboubi Soroosh, Stafford Perry W, Nance Michael L
Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
J Trauma. 2003 Aug;55(2):236-9; discussion 239-40. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000079250.80811.D1.
Computed tomographic (CT) scanning is sensitive in detecting pelvic fractures in the pediatric patient. Pelvic fractures in the pediatric population rarely require emergent intervention, thus providing time to obtain the optimal imaging study. The objective of this study was to compare pelvic radiographs and abdominal pelvic CT scans of all pediatric trauma patients with pelvic injury to determine the role of pelvic imaging in the immediate trauma resuscitation.
A retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with a pelvic fracture identified from the registry of a Level I pediatric trauma center for the period 1993 to 2001. Patients with a documented pelvic injury and both a pelvic CT scan and pelvic radiograph available for review were extracted for analysis. For this study, all films were re-reviewed by an attending pediatric radiologist, and the abnormalities were categorized by the area of injury. The data were comparatively analyzed according to the area of injury and the soft tissue findings.
For the 8-year period, 130 pediatric patients with a pelvic fracture were identified, including 103 patients with both a pelvic CT scan and radiographs. Of the 151 fractures identified by pelvic CT scan, 81 were also identified by the pelvic radiograph (54%). There were 38 soft tissue hematomas noted by pelvic CT scan and only 2 identified by the pelvic radiograph. The greatest discrepancy was noted in comparison of the sacral region (16 abnormal pelvic CT scans vs. 3 abnormal radiographs); the least discrepancy was noted in the evaluation of the hip (6 abnormal pelvic CT scans vs. 5 abnormal radiographs).
The pelvic radiograph lacked the sensitivity of the pelvic CT scan for detecting pelvic fractures in all anatomic areas evaluated. Pelvic CT scan also offers additional information regarding soft tissue injury not available on most pelvic radiographs. In the trauma patient that will undergo abdominopelvic CT scanning as part of the trauma evaluation, a pelvic radiograph may be superfluous. Screening pelvic radiography should be reserved for the rare unstable patient or the patient in whom an abdominopelvic CT scan is not otherwise indicated.
计算机断层扫描(CT)在检测儿科患者骨盆骨折方面很敏感。儿科人群中的骨盆骨折很少需要紧急干预,因此有时间进行最佳的影像学检查。本研究的目的是比较所有骨盆受伤的儿科创伤患者的骨盆X线片和腹部骨盆CT扫描,以确定骨盆成像在即时创伤复苏中的作用。
对1993年至2001年期间从一级儿科创伤中心登记处识别出的骨盆骨折儿科患者(年龄<18岁)进行回顾性研究。提取有记录的骨盆损伤且有骨盆CT扫描和骨盆X线片可供复查的患者进行分析。在本研究中,所有片子均由儿科放射科主治医生重新复查,异常情况按损伤区域分类。根据损伤区域和软组织检查结果对数据进行比较分析。
在这8年期间,共识别出130例骨盆骨折的儿科患者,其中103例同时有骨盆CT扫描和X线片。在骨盆CT扫描识别出的151处骨折中,81处也被骨盆X线片识别出(54%)。骨盆CT扫描发现38处软组织血肿,而骨盆X线片仅发现2处。骶骨区域的差异最大(骨盆CT扫描异常16例,X线片异常3例);髋部评估的差异最小(骨盆CT扫描异常6例,X线片异常5例)。
骨盆X线片在评估的所有解剖区域检测骨盆骨折方面缺乏骨盆CT扫描的敏感性。骨盆CT扫描还能提供大多数骨盆X线片无法提供的有关软组织损伤的额外信息。对于作为创伤评估一部分将接受腹部骨盆CT扫描的创伤患者,骨盆X线片可能是多余的。筛查性骨盆X线摄影应仅用于罕见的不稳定患者或未另行指明需进行腹部骨盆CT扫描的患者。