Udekwu Pascal, Roy Sara, McIntyre Sarah, Farrell Meagan
Am Surg. 2018 Sep 1;84(9):1406-1409.
Flail chest is used as one of the indicators for rib fixation, which is being performed more frequently. Radiologic and clinical flail chest are not clearly differentiated in published studies and the relationship between radiologic flail chest (RFC) and outcomes are not clearly established. Our study was designed to evaluate the relationship of RFC to outcomes in patients with severe blunt chest injury. Adult patients with severe blunt chest injury admitted between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, were identified retrospectively. Three hundred and eighty-three patients were studied and mortality rate was not significantly different in patients with an RFC diagnosis (5.88%) compared with patients without RFC (3.83%), = 0.50. Length of stay (LOS) in patients with and without RFC were compared and patients with RFC were found to have a statistically significant increase in both hospital and intensive care unit LOS ( = 0.0178, < 0.0017). Multivariate analysis confirmed RFC as an independent predictor of increased LOS when compared with the number of rib fractures and displacements. Our study suggests that RFC may drive inappropriate use of rib fixation. This questions the justification of liberal rib fixation based on the perceived high mortality rate of modern flail chest diagnoses.
连枷胸被用作肋骨固定的指标之一,且肋骨固定的实施频率越来越高。在已发表的研究中,影像学连枷胸和临床连枷胸并未得到明确区分,影像学连枷胸(RFC)与预后之间的关系也未明确确立。我们的研究旨在评估RFC与严重钝性胸部损伤患者预后的关系。对2014年1月1日至2016年6月30日期间收治的严重钝性胸部损伤成年患者进行回顾性研究。共研究了383例患者,RFC诊断患者的死亡率(5.88%)与无RFC患者(3.83%)相比无显著差异,P = 0.50。比较了有和无RFC患者的住院时间(LOS),发现有RFC患者的医院和重症监护病房LOS均有统计学意义的增加(P = 0.0178,P < 0.0017)。多变量分析证实,与肋骨骨折和移位数量相比,RFC是LOS增加的独立预测因素。我们的研究表明,RFC可能导致肋骨固定的不恰当使用。这对基于现代连枷胸诊断的高死亡率而进行的广泛肋骨固定的合理性提出了质疑。