Suppr超能文献

对于平地跌倒的老年患者,是否需要进行“全扫描”?

Is a "Pan-Scan" Indicated in the Older Patient with a Ground Level Fall?

作者信息

Kim Christine, Sartin Rebecca, Dissanaike Sharmila

出版信息

Am Surg. 2018 Sep 1;84(9):1480-1483. doi: 10.1177/000313481808400954.

Abstract

Routine full-body CT "pan-scan" use in older patients after ground level falls (GLFs) is of questionable benefit. Retrospective review of new diagnosis & changes in management in patients >55 years with Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 after a GLF who received a pan-scan (routine head, cervical spine/neck, chest abdomen, and pelvis CT). Head CT results were considered separately; results described in the following paragraph pertains to cervical spine/neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT. One hundred and fifty-two patients received pan-scans; 96 (63%) had new findings. Thirty-five (23%) resulted in a minor change and three (2%) in a major change in management, defined as a procedural intervention. This included tube thoracostomy in one patient and cervical spine surgery in two. A further eight patients required the use of a cervical collar. In all patients requiring intervention, there were clinical signs present that should have led to directed CT scan of area of concern. Routine pan-scans in stable, alert older patients after a GLF result in new findings in most patients, with primarily nonprocedural interventions for these additional findings.

摘要

对于老年患者在平地跌倒(GLF)后进行常规全身CT“全景扫描”的益处存疑。对年龄大于55岁、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为15分、在GLF后接受全景扫描(常规头部、颈椎/颈部、胸部、腹部和骨盆CT)的患者的新诊断及管理变化进行回顾性分析。头部CT结果单独考虑;以下段落描述的结果涉及颈椎/颈部、胸部、腹部和骨盆CT。152例患者接受了全景扫描;96例(63%)有新发现。35例(23%)导致管理上的轻微改变,3例(2%)导致管理上的重大改变,重大改变定义为进行程序性干预。这包括1例患者进行了胸腔闭式引流术,2例患者进行了颈椎手术。另有8例患者需要使用颈托。在所有需要干预的患者中,都有临床体征,本应据此对相关部位进行针对性CT扫描。对于稳定、清醒的老年患者在GLF后进行常规全景扫描,大多数患者会有新发现,对这些额外发现主要采取非程序性干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验