• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经心理评估后驾驶建议:神经心理学家的调查。

Recommendations for Driving After Neuropsychological Assessment: A Survey of Neuropsychologists.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge , LA , USA.

b Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Providence , RI , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Aug;33(6):971-987. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1518490. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2018.1518490
PMID:30269652
Abstract

To determine which patient, provider and practice-related characteristics are associated with increased likelihood of driving-related recommendations following a neuropsychological evaluation. A total of 309 clinical neuropsychologists completed a survey evaluating the frequency with which they made various driving-related recommendations (e.g., take an on-road driving test) to a variety of clinical populations. Information regarding patient characteristics (e.g., perceived likelihood of adhering to recommendations), provider-related characteristics (e.g., years in practice) and practice-related characteristics (e.g., region of North America) were also collected. Correlation coefficients and multiple linear regressions controlling for patient diagnoses were used to examine which characteristics predicted greater likelihood of driving recommendations broadly. Significant characteristics were then entered into regressions to examine independent contributions of each characteristic to the likelihood of each individual driving recommendation. Neuropsychologists reported giving a range of driving recommendations to most clinical populations, with the exception of patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Several characteristics (e.g., patient impairment) were associated with greater likelihood of driving recommendations broadly. After controlling for diagnoses, three significant predictors emerged: higher frequency of individualized recommendations, greater caregiver presence, and greater number of recommendations given. All three characteristics generally predicted frequency of all individual driving recommendations. While patients' diagnoses may be indicative of whether they receive driving-related recommendations, certain patient and provider-related factors also uniquely contribute to the likelihood of driving-related recommendations after neuropsychological assessment.

摘要

为了确定哪些患者、提供方和实践相关特征与神经心理评估后增加与驾驶相关的建议的可能性有关。共有 309 名临床神经心理学家完成了一项调查,评估他们向各种临床人群提出各种与驾驶相关的建议(例如,进行路考)的频率。还收集了有关患者特征(例如,对建议的遵守程度)、提供方相关特征(例如,从业年限)和实践相关特征(例如,北美地区)的信息。使用相关系数和多元线性回归来控制患者诊断,以检查哪些特征可广泛预测更有可能提出驾驶建议。然后将显著特征纳入回归,以检查每个特征对每个单独驾驶建议的可能性的独立贡献。神经心理学家报告对大多数临床人群提出了一系列驾驶建议,但对精神科诊断的患者除外。一些特征(例如,患者受损)与更广泛地提出驾驶建议的可能性有关。在控制了诊断后,出现了三个显著的预测因素:个性化建议的频率更高、照顾者的存在更多、提出的建议更多。这三个特征通常预测了所有单独驾驶建议的频率。虽然患者的诊断可能表明他们是否会收到与驾驶相关的建议,但某些患者和提供方相关因素也会对神经心理评估后与驾驶相关的建议的可能性产生独特的影响。

相似文献

1
Recommendations for Driving After Neuropsychological Assessment: A Survey of Neuropsychologists.神经心理评估后驾驶建议:神经心理学家的调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Aug;33(6):971-987. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1518490. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
2
What types of recommendations are we giving patients? A survey of clinical neuropsychologists.我们在给患者什么样的建议?一项对临床神经心理学家的调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan;33(1):57-74. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1456564. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
Adherence to Validity Testing Recommendations in Neuropsychological Assessment: A Survey of INS and NAN Members.神经心理学评估中对效度测试建议的遵循情况:INS和NAN成员调查
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jun 1;32(4):456-471. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx009.
4
Referring Providers' Preferences and Satisfaction with Neuropsychological Services.转诊机构对神经心理学服务的偏好与满意度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jun 1;32(4):427-436. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx007.
5
A survey of neuropsychological assessment feedback practices among neuropsychologists.神经心理学家的神经心理评估反馈实践调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):529-556. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2233738. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
The stakeholders' project in neuropsychological report writing: a survey of neuropsychologists' and referral sources' views of neuropsychological reports.利益相关者在神经心理学报告撰写中的作用:神经心理学家和转介来源对神经心理学报告看法的调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):326-344. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1373859. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
7
[Formula: see text]Survey methods for neuropsychologists: A review of typical methodological pitfalls and suggested solutions.神经心理学家的调查方法:典型方法陷阱及建议解决方案综述。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan;34(1):13-31. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1590642. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
The practice of clinical neuropsychology in Australia.澳大利亚的临床神经心理学实践。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Nov;30(8):1179-1192. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1195015. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Training models and status of clinical neuropsychologists in Europe: Results of a survey on 30 countries.欧洲临床神经心理学家的培训模式和现状:对 30 个国家的调查结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan;33(1):32-56. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1484169. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
The American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, National Academy of Neuropsychology, and Society for Clinical Neuropsychology (APA Division 40) 2015 TCN Professional Practice and 'Salary Survey': Professional Practices, Beliefs, and Incomes of U.S. Neuropsychologists.美国临床神经心理学学会、国家神经心理学学会和临床神经心理学协会(美国心理学会第40分会)2015年临床神经心理学专业实践与薪资调查:美国神经心理学家的专业实践、信念与收入
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(8):1069-162. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1140228.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting driving performance in patients with Multiple Sclerosis - still an open question.影响多发性硬化症患者驾驶性能的因素——仍是一个悬而未决的问题。
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 28;15:1369143. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1369143. eCollection 2024.
2
Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current Measures, Findings, and Implications for Roadway Safety.老年人的驾驶性能:当前的测量方法、研究结果及对道路安全的影响
Innov Aging. 2022 Jan 7;6(1):igab051. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab051. eCollection 2022.
3
Driving and Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist's role.
驾驶与阿尔茨海默病或轻度认知障碍:现有指南的系统综述,重点强调神经科医生的作用。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Dec;42(12):4953-4963. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05610-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28.