Suppr超能文献

急性脑损伤患者发热监测与管理的调查:SUMMA 研究。

A Survey on Fever Monitoring and Management in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The SUMMA Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV-University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct;31(4):399-405. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000536.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fever is common in patients with acute brain injury and worsens secondary brain injury and clinical outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the definition of fever and its management. The aims of the survey were to explore: (a) fever definitions, (b) thresholds to trigger temperature management, and (c) therapeutic strategies to control fever.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire (26 items) was made available to members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine via its website between July 2016 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Among 231 respondents, 193 provided complete responses to the questionnaire (84%); mostly intensivists (n=124, [54%]). Body temperature was most frequently measured using a bladder probe (n=93, [43%]). A large proportion of respondents considered fever as a body temperature >38.3°C (n=71, [33%]). The main thresholds for antipyretic therapy were 37.5°C (n=74, [34%]) and 38.0°C (n=86, [40%]); however, lower thresholds (37.0 to 37.5°C) were targeted in cases of intracranial hypertension and cerebral ischemia. Among first-line methods to treat fever, ice packs were the most frequently utilized physical method (n=90, [47%]), external nonautomated system was the most frequent utilized device (n=49, [25%]), and paracetamol was the most frequently utilized drug (n=135, [70%]). Among second-line methods, intravenous infusion of cold fluids was the most frequently utilized physical method (n=68, [35%]), external computerized automated system was the most frequently utilized device (n=75, [39%]), and diclofenac was the most frequently utilized drug (n=62, [32%]). Protocols for fever control and shivering management were available to 83 (43%) and 54 (28%) of respondents, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this survey we identified substantial variability in fever definition and application of temperature management in acute brain injury patients. These findings may be helpful in promoting educational interventions and in designing future studies on this topic.

摘要

背景

发热在急性脑损伤患者中很常见,会加重继发性脑损伤和临床预后。目前,对于发热的定义及其管理尚未达成共识。本研究旨在探讨:(a)发热的定义;(b)触发体温管理的阈值;(c)控制发热的治疗策略。

材料与方法

2016 年 7 月至 2016 年 12 月,通过欧洲重症监护医学学会网站向学会成员发放问卷(共 26 个条目)。

结果

在 231 名回复者中,193 名(84%)完整回答了问卷;主要为重症监护医生(n=124,[54%])。最常使用膀胱探头测量体温(n=93,[43%])。多数回复者将发热定义为体温>38.3°C(n=71,[33%])。退热治疗的主要阈值为 37.5°C(n=74,[34%])和 38.0°C(n=86,[40%]);然而,在颅内压升高和脑缺血的情况下,目标阈值更低(37.0-37.5°C)。作为治疗发热的一线方法,冰袋是最常使用的物理降温方法(n=90,[47%]),外部非自动化系统是最常使用的设备(n=49,[25%]),对乙酰氨基酚是最常使用的药物(n=135,[70%])。二线方法中,静脉输注冷液是最常使用的物理降温方法(n=68,[35%]),外部计算机化自动化系统是最常使用的设备(n=75,[39%]),双氯芬酸是最常使用的药物(n=62,[32%])。83 名(43%)和 54 名(28%)回复者分别有控制发热和寒战的管理方案。

结论

本研究中,我们发现急性脑损伤患者中发热定义和体温管理应用存在较大差异。这些发现可能有助于促进相关教育干预,并为该主题的未来研究提供参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验