Department of Bioscience, Section for Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116, Buildg. 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Department of Bioscience, Section for Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116, Buildg. 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Insect Physiol. 2018 Nov-Dec;111:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
Heat tolerance is commonly assessed as the critical thermal maximum (CTmax) using the dynamic method exposing organisms to a gradually increasing (ramping) temperature until organisms fall into a coma. The CTmax estimate is dependent on the ramping rate, with decreased rates leading to longer treatments and ultimately lower CTmax estimates. There is a current discussion surrounding the physiological dynamics of the effect of the time of exposure by temperature interaction on these estimates. Besides temperature the time of exposure to limited food (starvation), desiccation, and reduced levels of oxygen or increased levels of CO may, in interaction with ramping rate, act as confounding factors when assessing upper thermal limits using the dynamic method. Here we test the role of the different potentially confounding factors for assaying thermal tolerance using a ramping assay under four different ramping rates, varying from 0.01 °C/min to 0.2 °C/min. We find that CTmax values are higher at faster ramping rates and that oxygen or CO concentration does not show any negative effect on the CTmax values obtained within the experimental pre-treatment period (32 h). Both water (up to 6 h) and food (up to 42 h) deprivation prior to assay showed a negative correlation with thermal tolerance of the flies. For both traits, we found a significant interaction with ramping rate, most likely due to prolonged assays at lower rates. However, as little water was lost during the ramping assay and as food deprivation only modestly affected CTmax values, results were very robust to the conditions experienced during the assay (even at slow rates) and mainly affected by the conditions experienced prior to performing the assay. Thus, for the most commonly applied experimental conditions CTmax estimates are unlikely to be biased or confounded by ramping rate, starvation, desiccation or deteriorating atmospheric composition.
耐热性通常使用动态方法通过评估临界热最大值(CTmax)来进行评估,该方法使生物体逐渐暴露在升高的温度下(升温),直到生物体陷入昏迷。CTmax 的估计取决于升温率,降低升温率会导致更长的处理时间,最终导致 CTmax 估计值降低。目前正在讨论温度暴露时间对这些估计值的生理动态的影响。除了温度之外,暴露于有限食物(饥饿)、干燥和氧气水平降低或二氧化碳水平升高的时间,在使用动态方法评估上限热极限时,可能会与升温率相互作用,成为混杂因素。在这里,我们使用四种不同的升温率(从 0.01°C/min 到 0.2°C/min)在升温测定中测试了不同潜在混杂因素在测定耐热性方面的作用。我们发现,CTmax 值在升温率较快的情况下较高,并且在实验预处理期(32 小时)内,氧气或 CO 浓度对获得的 CTmax 值没有任何负面影响。在进行测定之前,水(长达 6 小时)和食物(长达 42 小时)的剥夺均与苍蝇的耐热性呈负相关。对于这两种特征,我们发现与升温率存在显著的相互作用,这很可能是由于在较低速率下进行了更长时间的测定。然而,由于在升温测定期间水的损失很少,并且由于食物剥夺仅适度影响 CTmax 值,因此结果对测定期间经历的条件非常稳健(即使在较慢的速率下),主要受到测定前经历的条件的影响。因此,对于最常见的实验条件,CTmax 估计不太可能受到升温率、饥饿、干燥或大气成分恶化的影响而产生偏差或混杂。