Tomabechi Nobuyasu, Takizawa Kazuki, Shibata Keisuke, Mizuno Masao
Sports Training Center, Nippon Sport Science University, Setagaya, Tokyo 158-8508, Japan.
Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0811, Japan.
Sports (Basel). 2018 Sep 29;6(4):107. doi: 10.3390/sports6040107.
The aim of this study is to clarify the effects of 3-week work-matched high-intensity intermittent cycling training (HIICT) with different cadences on the VO of university athletes. Eighteen university athletes performed HIICT with either 60 rpm ( = 9) or 120 rpm ( = 9). The HIICT consisted of eight sets of 20 s exercise with a 10 s passive rest between each set. The initial training intensity was set at 135% of VO and was decreased by 5% every two sets. Athletes in both groups performed nine sessions of HIICT during a 3-week period. The total workload and achievement rate of the workload calculated before experiments in each group were used for analysis. VO was measured pre- and post-training. After 3 weeks of training, no significant differences in the total workload and the achievement rate of the workload were found between the two groups. VO similarly increased in both groups from pre- to post-training ( = 0.016), with no significant differences between the groups ( = 0.680). These results suggest that cadence during HIICT is not a training variable affecting the effect of VO.
本研究的目的是阐明为期3周的与工作相匹配的不同踏频高强度间歇骑行训练(HIICT)对大学生运动员最大摄氧量(VO₂max)的影响。18名大学生运动员分别以60转/分钟(n = 9)或120转/分钟(n = 9)进行HIICT。HIICT包括八组每组20秒的运动,每组之间有10秒的被动休息。初始训练强度设定为最大摄氧量的135%,每两组降低5%。两组运动员在3周内进行了9次HIICT训练。每组实验前计算的总工作量和工作量完成率用于分析。在训练前后测量最大摄氧量。经过3周训练后,两组之间的总工作量和工作量完成率没有显著差异。两组的最大摄氧量从训练前到训练后同样增加(p = 0.016),两组之间没有显著差异(p = 0.680)。这些结果表明,HIICT期间的踏频不是影响最大摄氧量训练效果的一个训练变量。