• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骑行经验、有氧能力和功率输出对偏好骑行节奏及最经济骑行节奏的影响。

Effect of cycling experience, aerobic power, and power output on preferred and most economical cycling cadences.

作者信息

Marsh A P, Martin P E

机构信息

Exercise and Sport Research Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-0404, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Sep;29(9):1225-32. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199709000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00005768-199709000-00016
PMID:9309635
Abstract

To determine the effects of cycling experience, fitness level, and power output on preferred and most economical cycling cadences: 1) the preferred cadence (PC) of 12 male cyclists, 10 male runners, and 10 less-trained male noncyclists was determined at 75, 100, 150, 200, and 250 W for cyclists and runners and 75, 100, 125, 150, and 175 W for the less-trained group; and 2) steady-state aerobic demand was determined at six cadences (50, 65, 80, 95, 110 rpm and PC) at 100, 150, and 200 W for cyclists and runners and 75, 100, and 150 W for less-trained subjects. Cyclists and runners (VO2max: 70.7 +/- 4.1 and 72.5 +/- 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1, respectively) maintained PC between 90 and 100 rpm at all power outputs and both groups selected similar cadences at each power output. In contrast, the less-trained group (VO2max = 44.2 +/- 2.8 mL.kg-1.min-1) selected lower cadences at all common power outputs and reduced cadence from approximately 80 rpm at 75 W to 65 rpm at 175 W. The preferred cadences of all groups were significantly higher than their respective most economical cadences at all power outputs. Changes in power output had little effect on the most economical cadence, which was between 53.3 and 59.9 rpm, in all groups. It was concluded that cycling experience and minimization of aerobic demand are not critical determinants of PC in well-trained individuals. It was speculated that less-trained noncyclists, who cycled at a higher percentage of VO2max, may have selected lower PC to reduce aerobic demand.

摘要

为确定骑行经验、体能水平和功率输出对偏好的和最经济的骑行踏频的影响:1)分别测定了12名男性自行车运动员、10名男性跑步运动员和10名训练较少的男性非自行车运动员在75、100、150、200和250瓦功率(针对自行车运动员和跑步运动员)以及75、100、125、150和175瓦功率(针对训练较少的组)下的偏好踏频(PC);2)分别测定了自行车运动员和跑步运动员在100、150和200瓦功率以及训练较少的受试者在75、100和150瓦功率下,六个踏频(50、65、80、95、110转/分钟和PC)时的稳态有氧需求。自行车运动员和跑步运动员(最大摄氧量分别为70.7±4.1和72.5±2.2毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)在所有功率输出下的偏好踏频均保持在90至100转/分钟之间,且两组在每个功率输出下选择的踏频相似。相比之下,训练较少的组(最大摄氧量 = 44.2±2.8毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)在所有共同功率输出下选择的踏频较低,踏频从75瓦时的约80转/分钟降至175瓦时的65转/分钟。在所有功率输出下,所有组的偏好踏频均显著高于其各自的最经济踏频。功率输出的变化对最经济踏频影响很小,所有组的最经济踏频在53.3至59.9转/分钟之间。研究得出结论,在训练有素的个体中,骑行经验和有氧需求的最小化并非偏好踏频的关键决定因素。据推测,训练较少的非自行车运动员以较高的最大摄氧量百分比骑行,可能选择较低的偏好踏频以降低有氧需求。

相似文献

1
Effect of cycling experience, aerobic power, and power output on preferred and most economical cycling cadences.骑行经验、有氧能力和功率输出对偏好骑行节奏及最经济骑行节奏的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Sep;29(9):1225-32. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199709000-00016.
2
Effect of cadence, cycling experience, and aerobic power on delta efficiency during cycling.踏频、骑行经验和有氧能力对骑行过程中效率变化的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9):1630-4. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00017.
3
Perceived exertion and the preferred cycling cadence.自觉用力程度与偏好的骑行节奏。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jun;30(6):942-8. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00025.
4
The association between cycling experience and preferred and most economical cadences.骑行经验与偏好及最经济踏频之间的关联。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Nov;25(11):1269-74.
5
Is a joint moment-based cost function associated with preferred cycling cadence?与偏好的骑行节奏相关联的基于关节力矩的成本函数存在吗?
J Biomech. 2000 Feb;33(2):173-80. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00155-4.
6
Neuromuscular, metabolic, and kinetic adaptations for skilled pedaling performance in cyclists.自行车运动员熟练蹬踏表现的神经肌肉、代谢和动力学适应性
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Mar;30(3):442-9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199803000-00016.
7
The effect of cadence on cycling efficiency and local tissue oxygenation.踏频对骑行效率和局部组织氧合的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Mar;27(3):637-42. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825dd224.
8
The Effect of Cadence on the Mechanics and Energetics of Constant Power Cycling.定频踏频对恒功率踏车运动力学和能量学的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 May;51(5):941-950. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001863.
9
Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs.骑行姿势对训练有素的自行车运动员在不同功率输出的爬坡过程中摄氧量和偏好踏频的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Mar;99(4):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0358-7. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
10
The relationship between cadence and lower extremity EMG in cyclists and noncyclists.骑行者与非骑行者的步频与下肢肌电图之间的关系。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Feb;27(2):217-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Calculation of Oxygen Uptake during Ambulatory Cardiac Rehabilitation.动态心脏康复期间摄氧量的计算
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 12;13(8):2235. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082235.
2
Understanding optimal cadence dynamics: a systematic analysis of the power-velocity relationship in track cyclists with increasing exercise intensity.理解最佳踏频动力学:对不同运动强度下场地自行车运动员功率-速度关系的系统分析
Front Physiol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1343601. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1343601. eCollection 2024.
3
The effects of crank power and cadence on muscle fascicle shortening velocity, muscle activation and joint-specific power during cycling.
曲柄功率和踏频对骑行过程中肌小节缩短速度、肌肉激活和关节特定功率的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2023 Jul 1;226(13). doi: 10.1242/jeb.245600. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Comprehensive Return to Competitive Distance Running: A Clinical Commentary.全面重返竞技性长跑:临床述评。
Sports Med. 2021 Dec;51(12):2507-2523. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01547-1. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
HIIT the Road Jack: An Exploratory Study on the Effects of an Acute Bout of Cardiovascular High-Intensity Interval Training on Piano Learning.杰克,踏上高强度间歇训练之路:关于急性心血管高强度间歇训练对钢琴学习影响的探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 10;11:2154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02154. eCollection 2020.
6
Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance.CrossFit公开赛表现的预测因素。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Jul 20;8(7):102. doi: 10.3390/sports8070102.
7
Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults.高级 CrossFit 运动员、休闲 CrossFit 参与者和身体活跃成年人之间的生理差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0223548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223548. eCollection 2020.
8
During Cycling What Limits Maximum Mechanical Power Output at Cadences above 120 rpm?在高于 120rpm 的踏频下,自行车运动中是什么限制了最大功率的机械输出?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jan;52(1):214-224. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002096.
9
Cardiorespiratory fitness and aerobic performance adaptations to a 4-week sprint interval training in young healthy untrained females.年轻健康未受过训练女性进行4周冲刺间歇训练后心肺适能和有氧能力的适应性变化
Sport Sci Health. 2017;13(1):17-23. doi: 10.1007/s11332-016-0313-x. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Endurance Performance during Severe-Intensity Intermittent Cycling: Effect of Exercise Duration and Recovery Type.高强度间歇骑行中的耐力表现:运动时长与恢复类型的影响
Front Physiol. 2016 Dec 2;7:602. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00602. eCollection 2016.