Radcliff Kris, Vijay Palaniswamy, Sarris Ruba F, Speltz Molly, Vose Joshua G
Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Medtronic Advanced Energy LLC, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 31;12(4):483-489. doi: 10.14444/5059. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Exposure of the anterior cervical spine requires dissection in proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Monopolar electrosurgical (ES) devices generate heat in contacted tissues, resulting in thermal damage and temperature change. This study examined depth of thermal injury and temperature change associated with use of a low-temperature electrosurgical device (LTD) compared to traditional electrosurgery during a cadaveric anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) dissection.
ACDF was performed, using ES or LTD, on cervical spines (C3-4 and C4-5) from 2 fresh human cadavers with intact neck soft tissues and no history of surgery. Cadavers were maintained at 22-23°C, and fiber-optic temperature sensors (Neoptix, Québec City, Québec, Canada) were placed near relevant structures to measure changes during dissection. Depth of thermal injury was assessed by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome histology of fixed tissue specimens.
Use of the LTD resulted in a statistically significant reduction in temperature change at platysma (3.0 ± 1.04 vs. 11.41 ± 3.10°C, = .003), carotid sheath (7.32 ± 1.13 vs. 15.57 ± 2.56°C, = .007), and longus colli (6.11 ± 1.32 vs. 12.9 ± 3.62°C, = .016) compared to ES. Temperature change at the trachea was similar between groups (6.06 ± 1.99 vs. 4.96 ± 1.89°C, = .528). Histology showed that LTD produced less mean and maximal depth of thermal injury compared to ES (mean: 0.5 vs. 1.2 mm; max: 0.9 vs. 1.8 mm; < .05).
The results of this pilot study demonstrate that anterior cervical spine exposure using an LTD reduces tissue temperature change and depth of thermal injury compared to ES.
Although exploratory, these results suggest that use of an LTD during ACDF may reduce the extent of thermal tissue injury during dissection. Future studies in live animal models are warranted to determine if thermal injury is a potential cause of common exposure-related complications, such as dysphagia and dysphonia.
颈椎前路手术需要在关键神经血管结构附近进行解剖。单极电外科(ES)设备会在接触的组织中产生热量,导致热损伤和温度变化。本研究比较了在尸体颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)解剖过程中,使用低温电外科设备(LTD)与传统电外科手术相关的热损伤深度和温度变化。
对2具颈部软组织完整且无手术史的新鲜人体尸体的颈椎(C3 - 4和C4 - 5)进行ACDF手术,分别使用ES或LTD。尸体维持在22 - 23°C,将光纤温度传感器(Neoptix,加拿大魁北克市)放置在相关结构附近,以测量解剖过程中的变化。通过苏木精和伊红染色以及固定组织标本的Masson三色染色组织学评估热损伤深度。
与ES相比,使用LTD导致颈阔肌温度变化(3.0±1.04 vs. 11.41±3.10°C,P = 0.003)、颈动脉鞘温度变化(7.32±1.13 vs. 15.57±2.56°C,P = 0.007)和颈长肌温度变化(6.11±1.32 vs. 12.9±3.62°C,P = 0.016)在统计学上有显著降低。两组之间气管的温度变化相似(6.06±1.99 vs. 4.96±1.89°C,P = 0.528)。组织学显示,与ES相比,LTD产生的热损伤平均深度和最大深度更小(平均:0.5 vs. 1.2 mm;最大:0.9 vs. 1.8 mm;P < 0.05)。
这项初步研究的结果表明,与ES相比,使用LTD进行颈椎前路暴露可减少组织温度变化和热损伤深度。
尽管具有探索性,但这些结果表明在ACDF手术中使用LTD可能会减少解剖过程中热组织损伤的程度。有必要在活体动物模型中进行进一步研究,以确定热损伤是否是常见的暴露相关并发症(如吞咽困难和发音障碍)的潜在原因。