Suppr超能文献

创伤患者肋骨骨折手术固定的疗效分析。

Outcome Analysis of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Trauma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL.

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001330.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes in patients with rib fractures (RFX) who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) to those treated nonoperatively.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two Level 1 Trauma Centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred seventy-four patients with multiple RFX divided into 2 groups: patients with surgically stabilized RFX (n = 87) were compared with nonoperatively managed patients in the matched control group (MCG) (n = 87).

INTERVENTION

SSRF.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Age, sex, injury severity score, RFX, mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and intensive care unit length of stay (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), co-injuries, and time to surgery. Patients were further stratified by presence or absence of flail chest and pulmonary contusion (PC).

RESULTS

Flail chest, displaced RFX, and PC were present significantly more often in SSRF patients compared with the MCG. Mortality was lower in SSRF group. HLOS and ICULOS were longer in SSRF group compared with the corresponding MCG patients regardless of timing to surgery (P < 0.01 for all). SSRF patients with flail chest had comparable HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV to MCG patients with flail chest (P > 0.3 for all). SSRF patients without flail chest had significantly longer HLOS and ICULOS than MCG patients without flail chest (P < 0.001 for both). Presence of PC did not affect lengths of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRF patients had reduced mortality compared with nonoperatively managed patients. HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV were longer in SSRF patients than in MCG. When flail chest was present, lengths of stay were comparable. PC did not seem to affect the surgical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较接受肋骨骨折手术固定(SSRF)与非手术治疗的肋骨骨折(RFX)患者的结局。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

两个 1 级创伤中心。

患者

174 例多发性 RFX 患者分为 2 组:接受手术固定 RFX 的患者(n = 87)与匹配对照组(MCG)中的非手术治疗患者(n = 87)进行比较。

干预措施

SSRF。

测量结果

年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分、RFX、死亡率、住院时间(HLOS)和重症监护病房时间(ICULOS)、机械通气时间(DMV)、合并伤以及手术时间。患者进一步根据连枷胸和肺挫伤(PC)的有无进行分层。

结果

SSRF 患者的连枷胸、移位 RFX 和 PC 明显比 MCG 患者更常见。SSRF 组的死亡率较低。无论手术时机如何,SSRF 组的 HLOS 和 ICULOS 均长于相应的 MCG 患者(所有 P 值均<0.01)。有连枷胸的 SSRF 患者与有连枷胸的 MCG 患者的 HLOS、ICULOS 和 DMV 相似(所有 P 值均>0.3)。无连枷胸的 SSRF 患者的 HLOS 和 ICULOS 明显长于无连枷胸的 MCG 患者(均 P<0.001)。PC 的存在并不影响住院时间。

结论

与非手术治疗的患者相比,SSRF 患者的死亡率降低。SSRF 患者的 HLOS、ICULOS 和 DMV 长于 MCG 患者。当存在连枷胸时,住院时间相似。PC 似乎不会影响手术结果。

证据水平

治疗性 3 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验