Suppr超能文献

标准化 Haller 指数和不对称指数联合评估漏斗胸更准确。

Standardized Haller and Asymmetry Index Combined for a More Accurate Assessment of Pectus Excavatum.

机构信息

Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Pediatrics, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan;107(1):271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.086. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of the Haller index (HI) is not standardized, and HI does not consider the asymmetry of pectus excavatum. The aim of this study was to determine the most appropriate level for measuring the HI and to introduce the asymmetry index (AI) in order to respect the aspect of asymmetry.

METHODS

Preoperative computer tomography scans of 43 patients with pectus excavatum were retrospectively analyzed by measuring both the HI and the AI at 3 different levels: (I) sternomanubrial junction; (II) caudal end of corpus sterni; and (III) tip of the xiphoid. The control group comprised 33 patients without chest wall deformity and a HI < 3.25. For each patient HI and AI were calculated according to a standardized protocol. A McNemar test was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the HI was highest when measured at level II (p < 0.388), and the AI exhibited the highest sensitivity at level I. When combining both indices, the sensitivity of assessing pectus excavatum significantly increased compared with the use of HI at level II alone (p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of the HI at level II represents the most valid standardized parameter for assessment of the severity of pectus excavatum. Asymmetry, on the other hand, is best assessed by the AI measured at level I. The combination of the standardized HI and AI not only provides a much more accurate description of pectus excavatum, but also improves the comparability of pectus excavatum patients in general.

摘要

背景

Haller 指数(HI)的测量方法尚未标准化,且 HI 未考虑漏斗胸的不对称性。本研究旨在确定测量 HI 的最佳水平,并引入不对称指数(AI)以尊重不对称性。

方法

回顾性分析了 43 例漏斗胸患者的术前计算机断层扫描(CT),在 3 个不同水平测量了 HI 和 AI:(I)胸骨柄结合处;(II)胸骨体末端;和(III)剑突末端。对照组包括 33 例无胸廓畸形且 HI<3.25 的患者。根据标准化方案,为每位患者计算 HI 和 AI。采用 McNemar 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

当在水平 II 测量 HI 时,其灵敏度最高(p<0.388),而 AI 在水平 I 时灵敏度最高。当同时结合这两个指数时,与单独使用水平 II 的 HI 评估漏斗胸的灵敏度相比,显著增加(p<0.002)。

结论

在评估漏斗胸严重程度方面,水平 II 处测量的 HI 代表最有效的标准化参数。另一方面,通过在水平 I 处测量 AI 可以最佳地评估不对称性。标准化 HI 和 AI 的组合不仅能更准确地描述漏斗胸,还能提高漏斗胸患者的可比性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验