Suppr超能文献

三线化疗在复发性或转移性胃癌中的作用:一项倾向评分匹配分析的队列研究。

The role of third-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: A cohort study with propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Choi Yong Won, Ahn Mi Sun, Jeong Geum Sook, Lee Hyun Woo, Jeong Seong Hyun, Kang Seok Yun, Park Joon Seong, Choi Jin-Hyuk, Sheen Seung Soo

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12588. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012588.

Abstract

In recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer, second-line chemotherapy is generally recommended in current guidelines. Although third-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are only a few reports about its benefits.A retrospective review was conducted on 682 patients who underwent at least first-line chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 297) or primary metastatic (n = 385) disease. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to lines of chemotherapy.One hundred sixty-seven patients (24.5%) underwent third- or further-line therapy. Third- or further-line therapy was frequently performed in patients with young age (<70) (P < .0001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1 (P < .0001), surgical resection before first-line therapy (P = .007), and first-line combination regimen (P = .001). The median OS for all patients after the initiation of first-line therapy was 10 months. The median OS of patients who received third- or further-line therapy was significantly longer than that of patients who received second- or lesser-line therapy (18 vs 8 months, P < .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that third- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.58, P < .0001). Moreover, patients who received third- or further-line therapy demonstrated better OS both in univariate (P = .002) and multivariate (P < .0001) analysis even after propensity score matching using baseline characteristics. The median OS after the start of third-line chemotherapy was 6 months. In addition, ECOG PS 0 or 1 at the initiation of third-line therapy (P < .0001) and surgical resection (P = .009) were independently associated with longer OS after third-line therapy.The current study suggests that third-line therapy could be recommended for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients with good PS after progression from second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice.

摘要

在复发性或转移性胃癌中,现行指南一般推荐二线化疗。尽管在一些国家的日常临床实践中经常进行三线治疗,但关于其疗效的报道却很少。对682例接受过至少一线化疗的复发性(n = 297)或原发性转移性(n = 385)疾病患者进行了回顾性研究。根据化疗线数分析临床病理特征和总生存期(OS)。167例患者(24.5%)接受了三线或更后线治疗。三线或更后线治疗在年龄较小(<70岁)(P <.0001)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(PS)为0或1(P <.0001)、一线治疗前接受手术切除(P = 0.007)以及一线联合方案(P = 0.001)的患者中经常进行。一线治疗开始后所有患者的中位OS为10个月。接受三线或更后线治疗的患者的中位OS明显长于接受二线或更少线治疗的患者(18个月对8个月,P <.0001)。多因素分析显示,三线或更后线治疗与良好的OS独立相关(风险比=0.58,P <.0001)。此外,即使在使用基线特征进行倾向评分匹配后,接受三线或更后线治疗的患者在单因素(P = 0.002)和多因素(P <.0001)分析中均显示出更好的OS。三线化疗开始后的中位OS为6个月。此外,三线治疗开始时ECOG PS为0或1(P <.0001)和手术切除(P = 0.009)与三线治疗后更长的OS独立相关。本研究表明,在临床实践中,对于二线化疗进展后PS良好的复发性或转移性胃癌患者,可推荐三线治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffe/6181587/362c6086068c/medi-97-e12588-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验