Choi Yong Won, Ahn Mi Sun, Jeong Geum Sook, Lee Hyun Woo, Jeong Seong Hyun, Kang Seok Yun, Park Joon Seong, Choi Jin-Hyuk, Sheen Seung Soo
Department of Hematology-Oncology.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12588. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012588.
In recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer, second-line chemotherapy is generally recommended in current guidelines. Although third-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are only a few reports about its benefits.A retrospective review was conducted on 682 patients who underwent at least first-line chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 297) or primary metastatic (n = 385) disease. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to lines of chemotherapy.One hundred sixty-seven patients (24.5%) underwent third- or further-line therapy. Third- or further-line therapy was frequently performed in patients with young age (<70) (P < .0001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1 (P < .0001), surgical resection before first-line therapy (P = .007), and first-line combination regimen (P = .001). The median OS for all patients after the initiation of first-line therapy was 10 months. The median OS of patients who received third- or further-line therapy was significantly longer than that of patients who received second- or lesser-line therapy (18 vs 8 months, P < .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that third- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.58, P < .0001). Moreover, patients who received third- or further-line therapy demonstrated better OS both in univariate (P = .002) and multivariate (P < .0001) analysis even after propensity score matching using baseline characteristics. The median OS after the start of third-line chemotherapy was 6 months. In addition, ECOG PS 0 or 1 at the initiation of third-line therapy (P < .0001) and surgical resection (P = .009) were independently associated with longer OS after third-line therapy.The current study suggests that third-line therapy could be recommended for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients with good PS after progression from second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice.
在复发性或转移性胃癌中,现行指南一般推荐二线化疗。尽管在一些国家的日常临床实践中经常进行三线治疗,但关于其疗效的报道却很少。对682例接受过至少一线化疗的复发性(n = 297)或原发性转移性(n = 385)疾病患者进行了回顾性研究。根据化疗线数分析临床病理特征和总生存期(OS)。167例患者(24.5%)接受了三线或更后线治疗。三线或更后线治疗在年龄较小(<70岁)(P <.0001)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(PS)为0或1(P <.0001)、一线治疗前接受手术切除(P = 0.007)以及一线联合方案(P = 0.001)的患者中经常进行。一线治疗开始后所有患者的中位OS为10个月。接受三线或更后线治疗的患者的中位OS明显长于接受二线或更少线治疗的患者(18个月对8个月,P <.0001)。多因素分析显示,三线或更后线治疗与良好的OS独立相关(风险比=0.58,P <.0001)。此外,即使在使用基线特征进行倾向评分匹配后,接受三线或更后线治疗的患者在单因素(P = 0.002)和多因素(P <.0001)分析中均显示出更好的OS。三线化疗开始后的中位OS为6个月。此外,三线治疗开始时ECOG PS为0或1(P <.0001)和手术切除(P = 0.009)与三线治疗后更长的OS独立相关。本研究表明,在临床实践中,对于二线化疗进展后PS良好的复发性或转移性胃癌患者,可推荐三线治疗。