Yan Lixia, Zhang Junhua, Yuan Yang, Cortese Samuele
School of Education, Soochow University, Soochow.
School of Education, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Big Data of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Yancheng Teachers University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12623. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012623.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is developmental disorder characterized by inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity. Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), are recommended as a first-line pharmacological intervention, whereas neurofeedback (NF) has been proposed as a nonpharmacological option. The comparative effects of MPH and NF need further exploration. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and/or tolerability of MPH and NF in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD.
We will include published as well as unpublished data. Two investigators will independently search PubMed, OVID, ERIC, Web of Science, ClinialTrials.gov, and a set of Chinese databases, including CNKI, CQVIP, and WanFang for head-to-head RCTs comparing MPH and NF. Experts will be contacted for unpublished data. The primary outcome will be the efficacy on ADHD core symptoms, measured by the change in the severity of ADHD symptoms, from baseline to endpoint and, if available, at follow-up (at any available time point). Secondary outcomes will be: dropouts for any reasons; efficacy on neuropsychological measures (working memory, inattention, and inhibition). We will conduct subgroup analyses to assess the impact of the following variables: age; type of NF; language of publication; comorbidities. Additionally, we will carry out meta-regression analyses to investigate the effect of sponsorship, year of publication, duration of intervention, and age of participants. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Risk of bias of individual studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Analyses will be performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.
No ethical issues are foreseen. Results from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.
PROSPERO CRD42018090256.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种以注意力不集中和/或多动/冲动为特征的发育障碍。包括哌甲酯(MPH)在内的精神兴奋剂被推荐作为一线药物干预手段,而神经反馈(NF)则被提议作为一种非药物选择。MPH和NF的比较效果需要进一步探索。我们将对比较MPH和NF在儿童/青少年及成人ADHD患者中的疗效和/或耐受性的头对头随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们将纳入已发表及未发表的数据。两名研究人员将独立检索PubMed、OVID、ERIC、科学网、ClinicalTrials.gov以及一组中文数据库,包括中国知网、维普资讯和万方数据,以查找比较MPH和NF的头对头RCT。将联系专家获取未发表的数据。主要结局将是对ADHD核心症状的疗效,通过ADHD症状严重程度从基线到终点以及如有可用数据则在随访(任何可用时间点)时的变化来衡量。次要结局将包括:因任何原因退出研究的情况;对神经心理学指标(工作记忆、注意力不集中和抑制能力)的疗效。我们将进行亚组分析以评估以下变量的影响:年龄;NF类型;发表语言;共病情况。此外,我们将进行meta回归分析以研究资助情况、发表年份、干预持续时间和参与者年龄的影响。将进行敏感性分析以检验研究结果的稳健性。将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估单个研究的偏倚风险。将使用综合荟萃分析软件进行分析。
预计不会出现伦理问题。本研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在相关的国内和国际会议上展示。
PROSPERO CRD42018090256。