Suppr超能文献

临床对比评价钕:钇铝石榴石激光与新型含酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙封闭剂治疗牙本质敏感症的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。

Clinical Comparative Evaluation of Nd:YAG Laser and a New Varnish Containing Casein Phosphopeptides-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, St-Joseph University, School of Dentistry, Beirut, Lebanon.

Advanced Specialty Education Program in Prosthodontics, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2018 Dec;27(9):860-867. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12984. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of Nd:YAG laser to that of a new varnish: MI Varnish with RECALDENT (GC), for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, with a follow-up of 6 months. Dentinal hypersensitivity was evaluated using a new thermal test never before used on dental tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A split-mouth design was used where teeth on one side received the same type of treatment. Twelve patients suffering from dentin hypersensitivity were chosen. Fifty-four teeth were divided into 27 pairs. Twenty-seven teeth received the Nd:YAG laser treatment, and the 27 contralateral teeth received MI Varnish application. Five parameters were measured, and the measurements were taken before treatment at baseline (T0), after 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) of the application. Air stimulation to obtain the Schiff air score, the score of discomfort according to the visual analog scale (VAS), the tactile score, and the thermal test that determines the minimum cold-stimulating temperature and the maximum heat-stimulating temperature were all used to assess sensitivity. Statistical analyses of the data were performed, and the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Exact Fisher tests and Chi-Square tests were conducted to compare percentages.

RESULTS

There was a clear decrease in dentin hypersensitivity for both treatments (Nd:YAG laser and MI Varnish) especially between baseline and 1 week, with maintenance of this state through the 6-month follow-up period. The difference between the two treatments was not significant, comparing, over time, the Schiff air score, the thermal test, and the VAS; however, the tactile score was significantly improved 6 months after the application of MI Varnish compared to the laser (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between the two treatments, Nd:YAG laser and MI Varnish. Both treatments were effective and reduced dentin hypersensitivity immediately after treatment up to 6 months.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较 Nd:YAG 激光与新型涂料 MI Varnish with RECALDENT(GC)治疗牙本质敏感的效果,随访时间为 6 个月。使用一种从未在牙本质组织上使用过的新型热测试来评估牙本质敏感。

材料和方法

采用分口设计,一侧的牙齿接受相同类型的治疗。选择了 12 名患有牙本质敏感症的患者。54 颗牙齿分为 27 对。27 颗牙齿接受 Nd:YAG 激光治疗,27 颗对侧牙齿接受 MI Varnish 应用。测量了五个参数,并在治疗前基线(T0)、治疗后 1 周(T1)、1 个月(T2)、3 个月(T3)和 6 个月(T4)时进行测量。空气刺激获得 Schiff 空气评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)的不适评分、触觉评分和确定最小冷刺激温度和最大热刺激温度的热测试用于评估敏感性。对数据进行了统计学分析,显著性水平设置为 p≤0.05。使用精确 Fisher 检验和卡方检验比较百分比。

结果

两种治疗方法(Nd:YAG 激光和 MI Varnish)均明显降低牙本质敏感性,尤其是在基线和 1 周之间,通过 6 个月的随访期维持这种状态。随着时间的推移,比较 Schiff 空气评分、热试验和 VAS,两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异;然而,与激光相比,MI Varnish 应用 6 个月后触觉评分显著改善(p=0.05)。

结论

两种治疗方法,Nd:YAG 激光和 MI Varnish 之间没有显著差异。两种治疗方法均有效,可立即降低牙本质敏感,持续 6 个月。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验