Rocha Lucila Soares da Silva, Riechelmann Rachel P
Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR.
Departamento de Oncologia - AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, BR.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Sep 21;73(suppl 1):e542s. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e542s.
Patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer live for a median of three years when treated with standard therapies. While the evidence guiding cancer-directed treatment of this disease comes from phase III trials that have mostly enrolled patients with good performance status, some patients present with poor clinical conditions. The best treatment for these patients remains to be determined. We performed a systematic review of the treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and poor performance status, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2. Eligible articles were prospective or retrospective studies or case reports published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and the Cochrane Library from onset until October 2017 using specific keywords for each search. We found a total of 18 publications, mostly case reports and retrospective studies (14 articles). One was an uncontrolled prospective trial, two were observational studies and one was an individual patient meta-analysis. Although some studies suggested benefits in terms of symptomatic response with standard chemotherapy, with good safety profiles when dose-reduced regimens were administered, a true survival gain could not be demonstrated. The scientific evidence for treating metastatic colorectal cancer patients with poor performance status is scarce, and more studies evaluating treatment for this population are necessary since this condition is not uncommon in clinical practice, particularly in the public healthcare system and developing countries and among destitute populations.
不可切除的转移性结直肠癌患者接受标准治疗时的中位生存期为三年。虽然指导该疾病癌症导向治疗的证据来自大多纳入身体状况良好患者的III期试验,但有些患者临床状况较差。这些患者的最佳治疗方案仍有待确定。我们对转移性结直肠癌且身体状况较差(定义为东部肿瘤协作组身体状况≥2)患者的治疗结果进行了系统评价。符合条件的文章为以英文、葡萄牙文或西班牙文发表的前瞻性或回顾性研究或病例报告。我们从开始到2017年10月,使用每个搜索的特定关键词在PubMed、EMBASE、LILACS和考克兰图书馆进行检索。我们共找到18篇出版物,大多为病例报告和回顾性研究(14篇文章)。1篇为非对照前瞻性试验,2篇为观察性研究,1篇为个体患者荟萃分析。虽然一些研究表明标准化疗在症状缓解方面有获益,采用剂量减少方案时安全性良好,但未能证实真正的生存获益。治疗身体状况较差的转移性结直肠癌患者的科学证据匮乏,鉴于这种情况在临床实践中并不少见,尤其是在公共卫生系统、发展中国家以及贫困人群中,因此需要更多评估该人群治疗的研究。