• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHADS和CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分的使用时间趋势,以及这些评分在一个流行的在线临床决策工具和医学参考文献中的地理分布和专业应用情况。

Time trends in use of the CHADS and CHA DS VASc scores, and the geographical and specialty uptake of these scores from a popular online clinical decision tool and medical reference.

作者信息

Habboushe Joseph, Altman Caroline, Lip Gregory Y H

机构信息

MD Aware LLC (MDCalc.com), New York City, New York.

Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University/Bellevue Medical Center, New York City, New York.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;73(2):e13280. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13280. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.13280
PMID:30281876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of the utilisation of such e-health approaches, including mHealth (use of mobile phones and other wireless technology in the delivery of medical care) assessments of health parameters, or the use of decision aids and online risk calculators over time have not been previously described. The objective of this analysis is to assess the time trends in use of the CHADS and CHA DS VASc scores in e-health, and the geographical and specialty uptake of these scores, using data gleaned from a popular online clinical decision tool and medical reference, MDCalc. We hypothesised that the change in use of the scores would reflect the changes in guidelines and trends in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The CHA DS VASc score was the 20th most popular calculator in 2012, rising to the second most popular calculator in 2018; the CHADS score showed the converse, dropping from no. 3 to no. 22. Use of the CHA DS VASc scores particularly increased in the United States, Canada and Australia over time while the United Kingdom experienced a greater traffic share in 2015. The majority users of the CHADS and CHA DS VASc scores were primary care physicians, with cardiologists being in the minority; the proportion of cardiologists was greater outside USA, compared to within USA.

CONCLUSION

Over time, use of the CHA DS VASc score increased, while use of the CHADS score decreased. The change in uptake could partly be related to introduction of guidelines recommending the use of the CHA DS VASc score for stroke risk stratification.

摘要

背景

此前尚未描述过此类电子健康方法的应用影响,包括移动健康(在医疗服务中使用手机和其他无线技术)对健康参数的评估,或随着时间推移使用决策辅助工具和在线风险计算器的情况。本分析的目的是利用从流行的在线临床决策工具和医学参考资料MDCalc收集的数据,评估电子健康中CHADS和CHADS - VASc评分的使用时间趋势,以及这些评分在地理区域和专业领域的应用情况。我们假设评分使用的变化将反映指南的变化和临床实践的趋势。

结果

CHADS - VASc评分在2012年是第20最受欢迎的计算器,到2018年升至第二最受欢迎的计算器;CHADS评分则相反,从第3降至第22。随着时间的推移,CHADS - VASc评分在美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的使用尤其增加,而英国在2015年的流量份额更大。CHADS和CHADS - VASc评分的大多数用户是初级保健医生,心脏病专家占少数;与美国国内相比,美国以外地区心脏病专家的比例更高。

结论

随着时间的推移,CHADS - VASc评分的使用增加,而CHADS评分的使用减少。使用情况的变化可能部分与推荐使用CHADS - VASc评分进行中风风险分层的指南出台有关。

相似文献

1
Time trends in use of the CHADS and CHA DS VASc scores, and the geographical and specialty uptake of these scores from a popular online clinical decision tool and medical reference.CHADS和CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分的使用时间趋势,以及这些评分在一个流行的在线临床决策工具和医学参考文献中的地理分布和专业应用情况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;73(2):e13280. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13280. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
2
Do physicians correctly calculate thromboembolic risk scores? A comparison of concordance between manual and computer-based calculation of CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores.医生是否正确计算血栓栓塞风险评分?CHADS2和CHA2 DS2 -VASc评分手动计算与基于计算机计算的一致性比较。
Intern Med J. 2016 May;46(5):583-9. doi: 10.1111/imj.13048.
3
Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA DS -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation.增强型人工智能决策工具用于预测中风,结合了 CHA2DS2-VASc 和房颤患者的山间风险评分的因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1452-1461. doi: 10.1111/jce.13999. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
The association between asymptomatic coronary artery disease and CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores in patients with stroke.无症状性冠状动脉疾病与中风患者的 CHADS2 和 CHA2 DS2 - VASc 评分之间的关系。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Sep;20(9):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/ene.12158. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
5
CHA DS -VASc scores for outcome prediction in acute ischaemic stroke.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分用于预测急性缺血性脑卒中的结局。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2018 Mar;48(3). doi: 10.1111/eci.12884. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
6
Guideline adherence of antithrombotic treatment initiated by general practitioners in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Danish survey.丹麦调查:全科医生启动的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗栓治疗的指南遵循情况。
Clin Cardiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):427-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.22133. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
CHADS2 score/CHA2 DS2 -VASc score and major artery occlusion in cardioembolic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动的心源性脑栓塞患者的CHADS2评分/CHA2 DS2 -VASc评分与主要动脉闭塞情况
Int J Stroke. 2014 Jul;9(5):576-9. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12227. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
CHA DS VASc score predicts unsuccessful electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分可预测持续性心房颤动患者电复律失败。
Intern Med J. 2017 Mar;47(3):275-279. doi: 10.1111/imj.13319.
9
Refinement of ischemic stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score of 1.心房颤动且CHA2 DS2 -VASc评分为1分患者缺血性中风风险的细化
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;37(11):1442-7. doi: 10.1111/pace.12445. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
The role of CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores in the prediction of stroke in individuals without atrial fibrillation: a population-based study.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分在预测无房颤个体中风中的作用:一项基于人群的研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jun;14(6):1155-62. doi: 10.1111/jth.13324. Epub 2016 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary trends in incident ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality in individuals with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者缺血性卒中、颅内出血及死亡率的当代发病趋势。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 May 1;11(3):228-238. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae022.
2
Epidemiology, prognosis, and challenges in the management of hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation.甲状腺功能亢进相关心房颤动的流行病学、预后及管理挑战。
Eur Thyroid J. 2024 Apr 1;13(2). doi: 10.1530/ETJ-23-0254.
3
QTc Interval is Associated with Atrial Fibrillation in Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome Phenotype.
QTc间期与代谢综合征表型个体的心房颤动相关。
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jul 15;15:6189-6198. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S361705. eCollection 2022.
4
Is the Median Hourly Ambulatory Heart Rate Range Helpful in Stratifying Mortality Risk among Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Patients?中位每小时动态心率范围对新诊断房颤患者的死亡风险分层有帮助吗?
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 14;11(11):1202. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111202.
5
Usage Patterns of Web-Based Stroke Calculators in Clinical Decision Support: Retrospective Analysis.临床决策支持中基于网络的中风计算器的使用模式:回顾性分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Aug 2;9(8):e28266. doi: 10.2196/28266.
6
Can we manage prophylactic therapy in COVID-19 patients to prevent severe illness complications?我们能否对新冠肺炎患者进行预防性治疗以预防严重疾病并发症?
J Vasc Bras. 2020 May 20;19:e20200057. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.200057.
7
Integrated Care in Atrial Fibrillation: A Road Map to the Future.心房颤动的综合护理:通向未来的路线图。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Mar;14(3):e007411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007411. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
CHA2DS2-VASc Is Associated With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.CHA2DS2-VASc评分与感染性心内膜炎患者的院内死亡率相关:一项横断面队列研究。
Cureus. 2020 Nov 22;12(11):e11620. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11620.