• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统(1997 年)和修订(2009 年)世界卫生组织登革热疾病分类法比较:一项回顾性研究,共纳入 30670 例患者。

Comparison between the traditional (1997) and revised (2009) WHO classifications of dengue disease: a retrospective study of 30 670 patients.

机构信息

União das Faculdades dos Grandes Lagos, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Laboratório de Modelagens Matemática e Estatística em Medicina, União das Faculdades dos Grandes Lagos, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1282-1293. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13155. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13155
PMID:30282115
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare WHO's traditional (1997) and revised (2009) guidelines for dengue classification, using a large sample of patients of all ages with varying clinical conditions from a dengue-endemic area in Brazil.

METHODS

We compared 30 670 laboratory-confirmed dengue cases (1998-2012) using both WHO's dengue classification guidelines. Stereotype ordinal logistic regressions were used to analyse the association between patients' demographics and signs and symptoms related to dengue infection severity, as defined in the 1997 and 2009 guidelines. We then compared the degree of agreement in dengue classification of both guidelines.

RESULTS

Dengue signs and symptoms in patients were poorly correlated to disease severity as defined by both guidelines (Cramer's V test <0.2). Hypotensive shock was the exception for both classifications, presenting dependence (Z = 56.42; P < 0.001, and Z = 55.24; P < 0.001) and high agreement (Cramers's V = 1; P < 0.001, and Cramers's V = 0.97; P < 0.001) for WHO 1997 and 2009, respectively. Last, we also found substantial agreement in disease classification between both guidelines (Kendall tau-b = 0.79; P < 0.001), although 2009 guidelines were more sensitive in the detection of severe cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We hope our results will inform the debate about dengue classification guidelines, particularly concerning clinical value, study comparability, and ways in which future guidelines can support the clinical management of dengue. Our results suggest that caution should be taken when using WHO guidelines to assess dengue severity to improve clinical management of patients.

摘要

目的

比较世界卫生组织(WHO)的传统(1997 年)和修订(2009 年)登革热分类指南,使用来自巴西登革热流行地区的大量不同年龄和临床情况的患者样本。

方法

我们使用 WHO 的两种登革热分类指南比较了 30670 例实验室确诊的登革热病例(1998-2012 年)。使用典型有序逻辑回归分析患者的人口统计学和与登革热感染严重程度相关的体征和症状与 1997 年和 2009 年指南定义之间的关系。然后,我们比较了两种指南在登革热分类方面的一致性程度。

结果

患者的登革热体征和症状与两种指南定义的疾病严重程度相关性较差(Cramer's V 检验<0.2)。低血压性休克是两种分类的例外,均表现出依赖关系(Z = 56.42;P < 0.001,Z = 55.24;P < 0.001)和高度一致性(Cramers's V = 1;P < 0.001,Cramers's V = 0.97;P < 0.001),分别适用于 WHO 1997 年和 2009 年指南。最后,我们还发现两种指南之间的疾病分类存在实质性一致性(Kendall tau-b = 0.79;P < 0.001),尽管 2009 年指南在检测严重病例方面更为敏感。

结论

我们希望我们的结果将为登革热分类指南的争论提供信息,特别是关于临床价值、研究可比性以及未来指南如何支持登革热的临床管理。我们的结果表明,在使用 WHO 指南评估登革热严重程度以改善患者的临床管理时应谨慎行事。

相似文献

1
Comparison between the traditional (1997) and revised (2009) WHO classifications of dengue disease: a retrospective study of 30 670 patients.传统(1997 年)和修订(2009 年)世界卫生组织登革热疾病分类法比较:一项回顾性研究,共纳入 30670 例患者。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1282-1293. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13155. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
Evaluation of the traditional and revised World Health Organization classifications of dengue cases in Brazil.评估巴西登革热病例的传统和修订后的世界卫生组织分类。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Oct;68(10):1299-304. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(10)02.
3
Evaluation of the World Health Organization 2009 classification of dengue severity in autopsied individuals, during the epidemics of 2011 and 2012 in Brazil.2011年和2012年巴西疫情期间对世界卫生组织2009年登革热严重程度分类在尸检个体中的评估。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015 Nov-Dec;48(6):658-64. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0287-2015.
4
Classification of dengue cases in Southwest India based on the WHO systems-a retrospective analysis.基于世界卫生组织系统的印度西南部登革热病例分类——回顾性分析。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Nov 1;112(11):479-485. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try080.
5
Reviewing the development, evidence base, and application of the revised dengue case classification.回顾修订后的登革热病例分类的发展、证据基础和应用。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 May;106(2):94-101. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000017.
6
Evaluation of the WHO classification of dengue disease severity during an epidemic in 2011 in the state of Ceará, Brazil.2011年巴西塞阿拉州登革热疫情期间世界卫生组织登革热疾病严重程度分类的评估。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014 Feb;109(1):93-8. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276140384.
7
Evaluation of the importance of fever with respect to dengue prognosis according to the 2009 WHO classification: a retrospective study.根据 2009 年世界卫生组织分类评估发热对登革热预后的重要性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 4;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2128-4.
8
An evaluation of the World Health Organization's 1997 and 2009 dengue classifications in hospitalized dengue patients in Malaysia.对世界卫生组织1997年和2009年登革热分类在马来西亚住院登革热患者中的评估。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Jul 14;8(7):869-75. doi: 10.3855/jidc.4283.
9
Dengue classification: current WHO vs. the newly suggested classification for better clinical application?登革热分类:世界卫生组织现行分类与新建议的分类相比,哪种更有利于临床应用?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Aug;94 Suppl 3:S74-84.
10
A comparison of WHO guidelines issued in 1997 and 2009 for dengue fever - single centre experience.1997年和2009年世界卫生组织发布的登革热指南比较——单中心经验
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Jun;63(6):670-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-or co-SARS-CoV-2 Infections Significantly Increase Severe Dengue Virus Disease Criteria: Implications for Clinicians.新冠病毒感染前或同时感染显著增加重症登革热病毒病标准:对临床医生的启示
Pathogens. 2024 Jul 10;13(7):573. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13070573.
2
Epidemiology, biology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of dengue virus infection, and its trend in Ethiopia: a comprehensive literature review.登革病毒感染在埃塞俄比亚的流行病学、生物学、发病机制、临床表现、诊断及其趋势:一项全面的文献综述
Trop Med Health. 2023 Feb 24;51(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41182-023-00504-0.
3
A cross-sectional survey to evaluate prescribers' knowledge and understanding of safety messages following Dengvaxia® product information update.
一项横断面调查评估了接种 Dengvaxia® 疫苗后产品信息更新后,医生对安全性信息的了解和认知。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):758-768. doi: 10.1002/pds.5447. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Untapped Potential: A Qualitative Study of a Hospital-Based Dengue Surveillance System.未开发的潜力:基于医院的登革热监测系统的定性研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):120-131. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0719. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Pulmonary manifestations of dengue.登革热的肺部表现
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Mar 2;46(1):e20190246. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190246.