Tang Li, Jia Pengli, Zhao Ling, Kang Deying, Luo Yanan, Liu Jiali, Li Ling, Zheng Hui, Li Ying, Li Ning, Guyatt Gordon, Sun Xin
Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e023838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023838.
There is a lack of curative medical treatment for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Acupuncture represents an important alternative therapy. According to the theory of traditional Chinese medicine and preliminary clinical evidence, the patients' acupoints and tender points may become sensitised when the body suffers from a disease state; stimulation of such sensitive points could lead to a disease improvement. It is thus hypothesised that acupuncture at highly sensitised points on patients with KOA would achieve better treatment outcomes than acupuncture at low/non-sensitised points. Previously, we conducted a pilot trial to prove the feasibility of further investigation.
A three-arm, parallel, multicentre randomised controlled trial of 666 patients will be conducted at four hospitals of China. Eligible patients with KOA who consent to participate will be randomly assigned to a high-sensitisation group (patients receive acupuncture treatment at high-sensitive points), a low/non-sensitisation group (patients receive acupuncture treatment at low/non-sensitive points) or a waiting-list group (patients receive standard acupuncture treatment after the study is concluded) via a central randomisation system using 1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the change of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total score from baseline to 16 weeks. Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded and participants will be asked not to reveal their allocation to assessors. The outcome analyses will be performed both on the intention-to-treat and per-protocol population. The primary analyses will test if acupuncture at highly sensitised points would achieve statistically better treatment outcomes than acupuncture at low/non-sensitised points and no acupuncture (ie, waiting list), respectively. A small number of prespecified subgroup analyses will be conducted.
Ethics approval has been granted by the Bioethics Subcommittee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University: 2017 (Number 228). Results will be expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals.
NCT03299439.
膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者缺乏有效的治疗方法。针灸是一种重要的替代疗法。根据中医理论和初步临床证据,当身体处于疾病状态时,患者的穴位和压痛点可能会变得敏感;刺激这些敏感点可能会改善病情。因此,假设对KOA患者在高敏点进行针灸治疗比在低敏/非敏点进行针灸治疗能取得更好的治疗效果。此前,我们进行了一项试点试验以证明进一步研究的可行性。
将在中国的四家医院对666例患者进行一项三臂、平行、多中心随机对照试验。符合条件且同意参与的KOA患者将通过中央随机系统以1:1:1的比例随机分配至高敏组(患者在高敏点接受针灸治疗)、低敏/非敏组(患者在低敏/非敏点接受针灸治疗)或等待列表组(患者在研究结束后接受标准针灸治疗)。主要结局是从基线到16周时西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数总分的变化。结局评估者和数据分析人员将保持盲态,并且会要求参与者不要向评估者透露其分组情况。将在意向性治疗人群和符合方案人群中进行结局分析。主要分析将分别检验在高敏点进行针灸治疗是否比在低敏/非敏点进行针灸治疗以及不进行针灸(即等待列表)在统计学上能取得更好的治疗效果。将进行少量预先指定的亚组分析。
四川大学华西医院生物伦理委员会已批准伦理许可:2017(第228号)。研究结果预计将发表在同行评审期刊上。
NCT03299439。