Sun Mingsheng, Geng Guoyan, Chen Jiao, Ma Xingsha, Yan Mingxi, Liu Xiaojia, Du Jiarong, Cai Dingjun, Zheng Hui, Zhao Ling, Liang Fan-Rong
College of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 30;9(7):e026904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026904.
Chronic neck pain is a challenging condition to treat in clinical practice and has a considerable impact on quality of life and disability. According to the theory of traditional Chinese medicine, acupoints and tender points may become sensitised when the body is in a diseased state. Stimulation of such sensitive points may lead to disease improvement and improved clinical efficacy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of needling at sensitive acupoints in providing pain relief, improvement of cervical vertebral function and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain.
This multicentre, randomised controlled, explanatory and parallel clinical trial will include 716 patients with chronic neck pain. Study participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to four treatment groups: the highly sensitive acupoints group, low/non-sensitive acupoints group, sham acupuncture group and waiting-list control group. The primary outcome will be the change in the visual analogue scale score for neck pain from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and McGill pain questionnaire, 12-item Short-Form health survey, Neck Disability Index, changes in the pressure pain threshold, range of cervical motion, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale and adverse events before treatment, post-treatment, and at 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 weeks post-treatment. The intention-to-treat approach will be used in the statistical analysis. Group comparisons will be undertaken using χ tests for categorical characteristics, and analysis of variance for continuous variables to analyse whether acupuncture in the highly sensitive acupoints group achieves better treatment outcomes than in each of the other three groups.
Ethical approval of this study has been granted by the local Institutional Review Board (ID: 2017 KL-038). The outcomes of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.
ChiCTR1800016371; Pre-results.
在临床实践中,慢性颈痛是一种难以治疗的病症,对生活质量和残疾状况有相当大的影响。根据中医理论,当身体处于患病状态时,穴位和压痛点可能会变得敏感。刺激这些敏感点可能会使病情改善并提高临床疗效。本研究旨在评估针刺敏感穴位在缓解慢性颈痛患者疼痛、改善颈椎功能和生活质量方面的疗效和安全性。
这项多中心、随机对照、解释性平行临床试验将纳入716例慢性颈痛患者。研究参与者将按1:1:1:1的比例随机分为四个治疗组:高敏感穴位组、低/非敏感穴位组、假针灸组和等待名单对照组。主要结局将是从基线到4周时颈部疼痛视觉模拟量表评分的变化。次要结局将包括诺斯威克公园颈痛问卷、麦吉尔疼痛问卷、12项简明健康调查、颈部残疾指数、压力疼痛阈值变化、颈椎活动范围、自评焦虑量表、自评抑郁量表以及治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后4、8、12、16和20周的不良事件。统计分析将采用意向性分析方法。对于分类特征,将使用χ检验进行组间比较;对于连续变量,将使用方差分析来分析高敏感穴位组的针灸治疗效果是否优于其他三组。
本研究已获得当地机构审查委员会的伦理批准(编号:2017 KL-038)。试验结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。
ChiCTR18 00016371;预结果。