• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较改良佐野法与窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类用于结直肠病变的随机对照试验。

Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano's and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions.

作者信息

Pu Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao, Cheong Kuan Loong, Koay Doreen Siew Ching, Yeap Sze Pheh, Ovenden Amanda, Raju Mahima, Ruszkiewicz Andrew, Chiu Philip W, Lau James Y, Singh Rajvinder

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5112, Australia.

Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):210-218. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.210.

DOI:10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.210
PMID:30283604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6162252/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the utility of modified Sano's (MS) the narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification in differentiating colorectal polyps.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy between 2013 and 2015 were enrolled in this trial. Based on the MS or the NICE classifications, patients were randomised for real-time endoscopic diagnosis. This was followed by biopsies, endoscopic or surgical resection. The endoscopic diagnosis was then compared to the final (blinded) histopathology. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (MS II/IIo / IIIa / IIIb I or NICE 1 2/3). The secondary endpoints were "endoscopic resectability" (MS II/IIo/IIIa I/IIIb or NICE 2 1/3), NPV for diminutive distal adenomas and prediction of post-polypectomy surveillance intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients were evaluated. The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in differentiating neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps were, 98.9%, 85.7%, 98.2% and 90.9% for MS; and 99.1%, 57.7%, 95.4% and 88.2% for NICE, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MS was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.86-0.98); and AUC for NICE was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69, 0.88). The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in predicting "endoscopic resectability" were 98.9%, 86.1%, 97.8% and 92.5% for MS; and 98.6%, 66.7%, 94.7% and 88.9% for NICE, respectively. The AUC for MS was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.87-0.98); and the AUC for NICE was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.75-0.90). The AUC values were statistically different for both comparisons ( 0.0165 and 0.0420, respectively). The accuracy for diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) with high confidence utilizing MS classification was 93.2%. The differentiation of SSA/P from other lesions achieved Sp, Sn, PPV and NPV of 87.2%, 91.5%, 89.6% and 98.6%, respectively. The NPV for predicting adenomas in diminutive rectosigmoid polyps ( = 150) was 96.6% and 95% with MS and NICE respectively. The calculated accuracy of post-polypectomy surveillance for MS group was 98.2% (167 out of 170) and for NICE group was 92.1% (139 out of 151).

CONCLUSION

The MS classification outperformed the NICE classification in differentiating neoplastic polyps and predicting endoscopic resectability. Both classifications met ASGE PIVI thresholds.

摘要

目的

评估改良佐野(MS)分类法及窄带成像国际结直肠内镜(NICE)分类法在鉴别结直肠息肉方面的效用。

方法

纳入2013年至2015年间接受结肠镜检查的患者。根据MS或NICE分类法,将患者随机分组以进行实时内镜诊断。随后进行活检、内镜或手术切除。然后将内镜诊断结果与最终(盲法)组织病理学结果进行比较。主要终点是鉴别肿瘤性和非肿瘤性息肉(MS II/IIo / IIIa / IIIb 与 I 或 NICE 1 与 2/3)的敏感性(Sn)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。次要终点是“内镜可切除性”(MS II/IIo/IIIa 与 I/IIIb 或 NICE 2 与 1/3)、微小远端腺瘤的NPV以及息肉切除术后监测间隔的预测。

结果

共评估了348例患者。MS分类法鉴别肿瘤性息肉与非肿瘤性息肉的Sn、Sp、PPV和NPV分别为98.9%、85.7%、98.2%和90.9%;NICE分类法的分别为99.1%、57.7%、95.4%和88.2%。MS分类法的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.92(95%CI:0.86 - 0.98);NICE分类法的AUC为0.78(95%CI:0.69, 0.88)。MS分类法预测“内镜可切除性”的Sn、Sp、PPV和NPV分别为98.9%、86.1%、97.8%和92.5%;NICE分类法的分别为98.6%、66.7%、94.7%和88.9%。MS分类法的AUC为0.92(95%CI:0.87 - 0.98);NICE分类法的AUC为0.83(95%CI:0.75 - 0.90)。两种比较的AUC值均有统计学差异(分别为 0.0165 和 0.0420)。使用MS分类法高置信度诊断无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉(SSA/P)的准确率为93.2%。SSA/P与其他病变的鉴别中,Sp、Sn、PPV和NPV分别为87.2%、91.5%、89.6%和98.6%。MS和NICE分类法预测微小直肠乙状结肠息肉(≤15mm)中腺瘤的NPV分别为96.6%和95%。MS组息肉切除术后监测的计算准确率为98.2%(170例中的167例),NICE组为92.1%(151例中的139例)。

结论

在鉴别肿瘤性息肉和预测内镜可切除性方面,MS分类法优于NICE分类法。两种分类法均符合美国胃肠内镜学会PIVI阈值。

相似文献

1
Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano's and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions.比较改良佐野法与窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类用于结直肠病变的随机对照试验。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):210-218. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.210.
2
Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia.双焦点放大窄带成像在结直肠肿瘤鉴别中的应用。
Dig Endosc. 2013 May;25 Suppl 2:16-20. doi: 10.1111/den.12075.
3
Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification to predict polyp histology: REDEFINE study (with videos).窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类预测息肉组织学:REDEFINE 研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep;84(3):479-486.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
4
ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.ASGE 技术委员会的系统评价和荟萃分析评估了 ASGE PIVI 阈值,以实时评估微小结直肠息肉的组织学。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Accuracy of narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals and histology of distal diminutive polyps: results from a multicenter, prospective trial.窄带成像预测结肠镜监测间隔和远端微小息肉组织学的准确性:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.035. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
6
Multicenter randomised controlled trial comparing the high definition white light endoscopy and the bright narrow band imaging for colon polyps.比较高清白光内镜检查和窄带成像技术用于结肠息肉检查的多中心随机对照试验
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun 16;9(6):273-281. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i6.273.
7
Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.开发并验证 WASP 分类系统,用于腺瘤、增生性息肉和无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的光学诊断。
Gut. 2016 Jun;65(6):963-70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308411. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
8
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Histologic Prediction for Colorectal Polyps Depending on the Use of Either Magnified or Nonmagnified Narrow Band Imaging.一项随机对照临床研究:比较使用放大或非放大窄带成像对大肠息肉进行组织学预测的诊断准确性
Clin Endosc. 2015 Nov;48(6):528-33. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.528. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
9
Comparison of different virtual chromoendoscopy classification systems for the characterization of colorectal lesions.不同虚拟染色内镜分类系统用于结直肠病变特征描述的比较
JGH Open. 2020 Jul 7;4(5):818-826. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12382. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Guidance for setting easy-to-adopt competence criteria for optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: a simulation approach.用于制定易于采用的微小结直肠息肉光学诊断能力标准的指南:一种模拟方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):812-822.e43. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging colonic polyps in 2024.2024 年的结肠息肉成像。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct;43(5):954-965. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01679-y. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, and Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Management of Rectal and Anorectal Lesions: A Narrative Review.内镜下黏膜下剥离术、内镜下黏膜切除术及经肛门微创手术治疗直肠和肛管病变:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 19;12(14):4777. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144777.
3
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.开发并验证 WASP 分类系统,用于腺瘤、增生性息肉和无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的光学诊断。
Gut. 2016 Jun;65(6):963-70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308411. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.ASGE 技术委员会的系统评价和荟萃分析评估了 ASGE PIVI 阈值,以实时评估微小结直肠息肉的组织学。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
3
乙状结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):181-200. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102259. eCollection 2023.
4
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.
5
Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.结肠息肉的黏膜成像:新进展和未来可能的发展方向。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;28(47):6632-6661. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632.
6
Indications and outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: A narrative review.无蒂结直肠病变内镜切除的适应证及结局:一项叙述性综述
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):275-295. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.275.
7
Accuracy and inter-observer agreement of the nice and kudo classifications of superficial colonic lesions: a comparative study.NICE 和 Kudo 分类法对结肠浅层病变的准确性和观察者间一致性:一项比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1561-1568. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03897-8. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Comparison of different virtual chromoendoscopy classification systems for the characterization of colorectal lesions.不同虚拟染色内镜分类系统用于结直肠病变特征描述的比较
JGH Open. 2020 Jul 7;4(5):818-826. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12382. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
放大窄带成像下无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的诊断特征:诊断准确性的前瞻性研究
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;30(1):117-23. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12688.
4
Impact of a computer-based teaching module on characterization of diminutive colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging by non-experts in academic and community practice: a video-based study.基于视频的研究:计算机教学模块对学术和社区实践中非专家使用窄带成像技术对小结肠息肉进行特征描述的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.032. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
5
Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification.内镜预测黏膜下深层浸润癌:窄带成像国际结直肠内镜(NICE)分类的验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.185. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
Optical biopsy of sessile serrated adenomas: do these lesions resemble hyperplastic polyps under narrow-band imaging?无蒂锯齿状腺瘤的光学活检:在窄带成像下这些病变与增生性息肉相似吗?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Dec;78(6):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
7
Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia.双焦点放大窄带成像在结直肠肿瘤鉴别中的应用。
Dig Endosc. 2013 May;25 Suppl 2:16-20. doi: 10.1111/den.12075.
8
Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging.内镜下无蒂锯齿状腺瘤的特征:采用高分辨率白光内镜和窄带成像技术的国际专家验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics.实时窄带成像鉴别结直肠息肉的良恶性:诊断操作特性的荟萃分析。
Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1704-13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303965. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
10
Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions.在社区实践中,利用窄带成像对结肠息肉进行实时光学活检尚不能满足临床决策的关键阈值。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):81-91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.054. Epub 2012 Oct 3.