• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类预测息肉组织学:REDEFINE 研究(附视频)。

Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification to predict polyp histology: REDEFINE study (with videos).

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep;84(3):479-486.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.020
PMID:26928372
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) Classification has been validated for differentiating hyperplastic from adenomatous polyps. This classification system was based on narrow-band imaging (NBI) technology, leaving uncertainty regarding its applicability to other systems. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy and reliability of histologic predictions for polyps <1 cm by applying the NICE classification to the Fujinon Spectral Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) System.

METHODS

A video library of 55 polyps <1 cm histologically verified with FICE was prospectively created, including polyps that fulfilled inclusion criteria (morphology, size, histology) in consecutive colonoscopies. Six endoscopists with experience in electronic chromoendoscopy independently reviewed the polyp images, scored the polyps as adenomatous or hyperplastic, and assigned a level of confidence to the predictions. Twenty videos were reassessed at 6 months. The diagnostic performances of the endoscopists was calculated both combined and individually according to the histopathology of the polyps. A mixed-effect logistic regression model, in which polyps were considered as random effects, and polyp histology, confidence level, and readers were considered as fixed effects, was used. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 55 polyps (mean size 4.6 mm), 29 (53%) were adenomas, and 26 (47%) were hyperplastic. Across all the readers and observations, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were 77%, 75%, 88%, 75%, 77%, and 0.82, respectively. Individual rater accuracy ranged from 66% to 96%, being <90% in 5 of 6 cases. Overall, 68.5% of predictions (226/330) were made with high confidence, although there was high variability (Fleiss kappa, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.22). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC for predictions made with high confidence were 81%, 80.5%, 80%, 77%, 82%, and 0.88 being significantly more accurate as compared with a low confidence of diagnosis (OR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.7). Regarding the performance of the individual NICE criteria, the odds of adenoma detection were 3.4 (95% CI, 1.8-6.3) and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.1-7.5) by using surface and vessels patterns alone, as compared with the color criterion. Interrater and intrarater agreement with the NICE was only moderate (interrater: Fleiss kappa, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.44-0.56; intrarater: kappa, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the NICE classification to FICE resulted in suboptimal accuracy and only moderate interobserver agreement.

摘要

背景与目的

窄带成像国际结直肠内镜(NICE)分类已被验证可用于区分增生性息肉和腺瘤性息肉。该分类系统基于窄带成像(NBI)技术,因此对于其他系统的适用性存在不确定性。本研究旨在通过将 NICE 分类应用于 Fujinon 光谱成像彩色增强(FICE)系统,评估其对<1cm 息肉的组织学预测的准确性和可靠性。

方法

前瞻性地创建了一个包含 55 个经 FICE 验证的<1cm 息肉的视频库,包括连续结肠镜检查中符合纳入标准(形态、大小、组织学)的息肉。6 名具有电子染色内镜经验的内镜医生独立回顾息肉图像,将息肉评为腺瘤性或增生性,并对预测结果的置信度进行评分。其中 20 个视频在 6 个月时重新评估。根据息肉的组织病理学,分别计算和组合所有内镜医生的诊断性能。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型,其中息肉被视为随机效应,息肉组织学、置信度和读者被视为固定效应。结果表示为比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在 55 个息肉(平均大小 4.6mm)中,29 个(53%)为腺瘤,26 个(47%)为增生性息肉。在所有读者和观察中,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 77%、75%、88%、75%、77%和 0.82。个体评分者的准确性范围为 66%至 96%,在 6 名内镜医生中,有 5 名的准确性<90%。总体而言,68.5%(226/330)的预测结果具有高度置信度,尽管存在高度变异性(Fleiss kappa,0.15;95%CI,0.08-0.22)。具有高度置信度的预测的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV、准确性和 AUC 分别为 81%、80.5%、80%、77%、82%和 0.88,与低置信度诊断相比明显更准确(OR 2.4;95%CI,1.2-4.7)。关于个体 NICE 标准的性能,与颜色标准相比,仅使用表面和血管模式的腺瘤检出率分别为 3.4(95%CI,1.8-6.3)和 4.0(95%CI,2.1-7.5)。使用 NICE 分类的观察者间和观察者内一致性仅为中等(观察者间:Fleiss kappa,0.51;95%CI,0.44-0.56;观察者内:kappa,0.40;95%CI,0.20-0.60)。

结论

将 NICE 分类应用于 FICE 导致准确性较低,且仅具有中等的观察者间一致性。

相似文献

1
Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification to predict polyp histology: REDEFINE study (with videos).窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类预测息肉组织学:REDEFINE 研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep;84(3):479-486.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
2
Accuracy of narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals and histology of distal diminutive polyps: results from a multicenter, prospective trial.窄带成像预测结肠镜监测间隔和远端微小息肉组织学的准确性:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.035. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
3
Leaving distal colorectal hyperplastic polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy by using narrow-band imaging: an observational study.使用窄带成像技术可以高精度地保留远端结直肠增生性息肉:一项观察性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.446. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
4
Comparison of Narrow Band Imaging and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement in Predicting Small Colorectal Polyp Histology.窄带成像与富士能智能色彩增强技术在预测小的结直肠息肉组织学方面的比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2777-84. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3661-5. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.使用窄带成像对微小结直肠息肉组织学进行实时特征分析:对切除与丢弃策略的影响
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):406-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging.基于蓝光成像的结直肠息肉特征的 BASIC(BLI 锯齿状腺瘤国际分类)分类。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):211-220. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121570. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
7
Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study.常规临床实践中小肠结肠息肉的窄带成像光学诊断:检测、检查、表征、切除与丢弃2(DISCARD 2)研究
Gut. 2017 May;66(5):887-895. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310584. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Is narrow band imaging superior to high-definition white light endoscopy in the assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps?窄带成像技术在评估微小结直肠息肉方面优于高清白光内镜吗?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;28(3):472-8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12098.
9
Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding.对小的结肠息肉进行光学诊断能准确吗?比较不带窄带成像的标准内镜与带窄带成像的高清内镜。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 28;22(28):6539-46. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539.
10
Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging.利用窄带成像技术验证一种用于结直肠小息肉内镜诊断的简单分类系统。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
From Staining Techniques to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Colorectal Polyps Characterization.从染色技术到人工智能:结直肠息肉特征分析综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 3;60(1):89. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010089.
2
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Optical Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role in Leave-In-Situ and Resect-and-Discard Strategies in Colonoscopy.人工智能辅助光学诊断:在结肠镜检查中留取原位和切除丢弃策略中的作用综述。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;14(10):e00640. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000640.
3
Accuracy of Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification for Predicting the Histology of Colon Polyps by Experienced Endoscopists and Trainees.
窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类在经验丰富的内镜医师和学员预测结肠息肉组织学中的准确性。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;34(8):866-872. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22854.
4
Evaluation of the competence of an artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system in clinical practice: A analysis.人工智能辅助结肠镜检查系统在临床实践中的能力评估:一项分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 6;10:1158574. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1158574. eCollection 2023.
5
Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a narrative review of current data and clinical applications.人工智能辅助结肠镜检查:当前数据及临床应用的叙述性综述
Singapore Med J. 2022 Mar;63(3):118-124. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022044.
6
Visibility evaluation of colorectal lesion using texture and color enhancement imaging with video.利用视频纹理和颜色增强成像技术对结直肠病变进行可视性评估。
DEN Open. 2022 Jan 11;2(1):e90. doi: 10.1002/deo2.90. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps in the Dutch Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Are we ready to start?荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目中微小息肉的光学诊断:我们准备好开始了吗?
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E257-E265. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4853. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging using a new international classification.应用新国际分类法的蓝激光成像在结直肠息肉光学诊断中的应用。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):316-325. doi: 10.1177/2050640618822402. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
9
Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: Recent Developments.结直肠息肉的光学诊断:最新进展
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;17(1):99-114. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00220-x.
10
Should We Resect and Discard Low Risk Diminutive Colon Polyps.我们应该切除并丢弃低风险微小结肠息肉吗?
Clin Endosc. 2019 May;52(3):239-246. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.136. Epub 2019 Jan 21.