• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估脓毒症负担以及了解国家卫生系统之间脓毒症结局不平等方面的挑战:德国脓毒症和感染发病率及死亡率的长期趋势。

Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany.

机构信息

Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.

Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1826-1835. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5377-4. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-018-5377-4
PMID:30284637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6244521/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sepsis contributes considerably to global morbidity and mortality, while reasons for its increasing incidence remain unclear. We assessed risk adjusted secular trends in sepsis and infection epidemiology in Germany.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using nationwide German hospital discharge data. We assessed incidence, outcomes and trends of hospital-treated sepsis and infections between 2010 and 2015. Sepsis was identified by explicit ICD-10 sepsis codes. As sensitivity analysis, results were compared with sepsis cases identified by implicit sepsis coding (combined infection and organ dysfunction codes).

RESULTS

Among 18 664 877 hospital admissions in 2015, 4 213 116 (22.6%) patients had at least one infection code. There were 320 198 patients that had explicit sepsis codes including 136 542 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock; 183 656 patients were coded as sepsis without organ dysfunction. For patients with explicitly coded sepsis (including severe sepsis), or with severe sepsis alone, mortality rates over the period 2010-2015 decreased from 26.6 to 23.5%, and from 47.8 to 41.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis and infection remain significant causes of hospital admission and death in Germany. Sepsis-related mortality is higher and has declined to a lesser degree than in other high-income countries. Although infection rates steadily increased, the observed annual increase of sepsis cases seems to result, to a considerable degree, from improved coding of sepsis.

摘要

目的

脓毒症导致了相当大的全球发病率和死亡率,但其发病率上升的原因仍不清楚。我们评估了德国脓毒症和感染流行病学的风险调整的时间趋势。

方法

这是一项使用全国性德国医院出院数据的回顾性队列研究。我们评估了 2010 年至 2015 年期间医院治疗的脓毒症和感染的发生率、结局和趋势。脓毒症是通过明确的 ICD-10 脓毒症代码来识别的。作为敏感性分析,结果与通过隐式脓毒症编码(合并感染和器官功能障碍代码)识别的脓毒症病例进行了比较。

结果

在 2015 年的 18664877 例住院患者中,有 4213116 例(22.6%)患者至少有一种感染代码。有 320198 例患者有明确的脓毒症代码,其中包括 136542 例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者;183656 例患者被编码为无器官功能障碍的脓毒症。对于明确编码为脓毒症(包括严重脓毒症)或仅为严重脓毒症的患者,2010-2015 年期间的死亡率从 26.6%降至 23.5%,从 47.8%降至 41.7%。

结论

脓毒症和感染仍然是德国住院和死亡的重要原因。脓毒症相关死亡率较高,且下降幅度小于其他高收入国家。尽管感染率稳步上升,但观察到的脓毒症病例的年增长率在相当程度上归因于脓毒症编码的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/ff97788d5e6c/134_2018_5377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/312444e9d57e/134_2018_5377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/cdca4f1f631d/134_2018_5377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/ff97788d5e6c/134_2018_5377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/312444e9d57e/134_2018_5377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/cdca4f1f631d/134_2018_5377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f30/6244521/ff97788d5e6c/134_2018_5377_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany.评估脓毒症负担以及了解国家卫生系统之间脓毒症结局不平等方面的挑战:德国脓毒症和感染发病率及死亡率的长期趋势。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1826-1835. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5377-4. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
2
Comparing the validity of different ICD coding abstraction strategies for sepsis case identification in German claims data.比较不同 ICD 编码提取策略在德国索赔数据中脓毒症病例识别的有效性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0198847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198847. eCollection 2018.
3
Use of explicit ICD9-CM codes to identify adult severe sepsis: impacts on epidemiological estimates.使用明确的国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD9-CM)编码来识别成人严重脓毒症:对流行病学估计的影响。
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 3;20(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1497-9.
4
Epidemiology and recent trends of severe sepsis in Spain: a nationwide population-based analysis (2006-2011).西班牙严重脓毒症的流行病学及近期趋势:一项基于全国人口的分析(2006 - 2011年)
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 21;14:3863. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0717-7.
5
Severe sepsis cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population.基于索赔策略得出的严重脓毒症队列似乎偏向于病情更严重的患者群体。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):945-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827466f1.
6
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
7
Incidence, trends, and outcomes of infection sites among hospitalizations of sepsis: A nationwide study.脓毒症住院患者感染部位的发生率、趋势和结局:一项全国性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227752. eCollection 2020.
8
Trends in sepsis and infection sources in the United States. A population-based study.美国脓毒症及感染源的趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Feb;12(2):216-20. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-498BC.
9
Impact of Policies on the Rise in Sepsis Incidence, 2000-2010.政策对2000 - 2010年脓毒症发病率上升的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 15;62(6):695-703. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1019. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
Association of diagnostic coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003-2009.2003-2009 年肺炎患者住院和死亡的诊断编码与趋势的相关性研究。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1405-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.384.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of modified shock index in sepsis.改良休克指数在脓毒症中的预后价值
Bioinformation. 2025 Apr 30;21(4):614-617. doi: 10.6026/973206300210614. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceived Trust and Professional Identity Threat in AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scenario-Based Experimental Study on AI Process Design Features.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统中的感知信任与职业身份威胁:关于人工智能流程设计特征的情景式实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e64266. doi: 10.2196/64266.
3
Admissions, mortality and financial burden associated with acute hospitalisations for sepsis between 2006 and 2018: A national population-level study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the validity of different ICD coding abstraction strategies for sepsis case identification in German claims data.比较不同 ICD 编码提取策略在德国索赔数据中脓毒症病例识别的有效性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0198847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198847. eCollection 2018.
2
Association Between the New York Sepsis Care Mandate and In-Hospital Mortality for Pediatric Sepsis.纽约脓毒症护理指令与儿科脓毒症院内死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):358-367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9071.
3
A risk-model for hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis or septic shock based on German national administrative claims data.
2006年至2018年间与脓毒症急性住院相关的入院情况、死亡率及经济负担:一项全国性人群水平研究。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Mar 16:17511437251326774. doi: 10.1177/17511437251326774.
4
Low expression of CD39 on monocytes predicts poor survival in sepsis patients.单核细胞上CD39的低表达预示着脓毒症患者的不良生存结局。
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 10;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00784-0.
5
An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.基于人工智能的脓毒症抗生素治疗临床决策支持系统(KINBIOTICS):用例分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 4;12:e66699. doi: 10.2196/66699.
6
Early sepsis recognition: a pilot study using a rapid high-multiplex host-response mRNA diagnostic test.早期脓毒症识别:一项使用快速高多重宿主反应mRNA诊断测试的试点研究。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00735-x.
7
Research trends and hotspots on septic shock: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis.脓毒症休克的研究趋势与热点:一项文献计量学研究及可视化分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 27;11:1490462. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1490462. eCollection 2024.
8
Aquaporins in sepsis- an update.水通道蛋白在脓毒症中的研究进展。
Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 31;15:1495206. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1495206. eCollection 2024.
9
Mortality due to Sepsis and Its Associated Factors Among Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units of Southern Amhara Public Hospitals, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚南方阿姆哈拉公立医院 ICU 住院患者中,因脓毒症导致的死亡率及其相关因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Oct 28;2024:4378635. doi: 10.1155/2024/4378635. eCollection 2024.
10
How are Long-Covid, Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and Post-Intensive-Care-Syndrome related? A conceptional approach based on the current research literature.长新冠、败血症后综合征和重症监护后综合征之间有何关联?基于现有研究文献的概念性方法。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 29;28(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05076-x.
基于德国国家行政索赔数据的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者院内死亡率风险模型。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194371. eCollection 2018.
4
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
5
Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution.将脓毒症确认为全球卫生重点——一项世界卫生组织决议
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
7
Surveillance of Vaccination Coverage among Adult Populations - United States, 2015.2015年美国成年人群疫苗接种覆盖率监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 May 5;66(11):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6611a1.
8
Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial.多方面教育干预对抗感染措施对脓毒症死亡率的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1602-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4782-4. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.脓毒症中早期使用抗生素的时机与医院死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
10
Sepsis Incidence: A Population-Based Study.脓毒症发病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 8;3(4):ofw207. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw207. eCollection 2016 Oct.