Struthers C Ward, Khoury Careen H, Phills Curtis E, van Monsjou Elizabeth, Guilfoyle Joshua R, Nash Kyle, Golenitski Vitali, Summers Carol
Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Mar;25(1):100-116. doi: 10.1037/xap0000188. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
The purpose of this research was to test how, why, and when social power influences victims' revenge seeking, grudge holding, and forgiveness. Based on Keltner, Gruenfeld, and Anderson's (2003) power approach theory and McCullough, Kurzban, and Tabak's (2013) theorizing about revenge and forgiveness systems, we tested (a) the associations between victims' social power and revenge, grudge, and forgiveness; (b) the mediational role of approach/inhibition motivation in explaining why the associations exist; and (c) the moderating role of whether the transgressor apologizes or not in explaining the associations. Five studies (Ns = 279, 181, 154, 131, and 81) that varied in sample (undergraduate, community), research method (nonexperimental, experimental), context (laboratory, online), measures (self-reported, behavioral), and statistical method (regression, ANOVA), supported our predictions and the systematic generalizability of the effects. Applied implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究的目的是检验社会权力如何、为何以及何时影响受害者寻求报复、怀恨在心和宽恕的行为。基于凯尔特纳、格伦费尔德和安德森(2003年)的权力方法理论以及麦卡洛、库尔兹班和塔巴克(2013年)关于报复和宽恕系统的理论,我们检验了:(a)受害者的社会权力与报复、怨恨和宽恕之间的关联;(b)接近/抑制动机在解释这些关联为何存在时的中介作用;以及(c)违规者是否道歉在解释这些关联时的调节作用。五项研究(样本量分别为279、181、154、131和81)在样本(本科生、社区居民)、研究方法(非实验性、实验性)、背景(实验室、在线)、测量方法(自我报告、行为)和统计方法(回归分析、方差分析)方面存在差异,支持了我们的预测以及这些效应的系统普遍性。文中还讨论了实际应用意义。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)