Suppr超能文献

抱歉,不是抱歉:社会权力对违规者道歉和不道歉的影响。

Sorry, not sorry: The effect of social power on transgressors' apology and nonapology.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Applied Psychology & Human Development (OISE).

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Dec;28(4):883-897. doi: 10.1037/xap0000392. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Abstract

The current research investigated the role of transgressors' social power on their motivation to apologize or not. Based on power approach theory (Keltner et al., 2003), we predicted that high-power transgressors would be less motivated to apologize and more motivated to engage in nonapology (e.g., shifting blame, minimizing the transgression) than their low-power counterparts. We further predicted that the relation between social power and apology and nonapology would be explained by transgressors' self-other focus. Four multimethod (nonexperimental, experimental), multisample (community, undergraduate) studies supported our predictions. Results are discussed within the context of the extant social motivation literature and applied implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当前的研究调查了侵犯者的社会权力对其道歉或不道歉动机的影响。基于权力接近理论(Keltner 等人,2003),我们预测高权力侵犯者的道歉动机较弱,而不道歉动机(例如,推卸责任、淡化侵犯行为)较强,而低权力侵犯者则相反。我们进一步预测,社会权力与道歉和不道歉之间的关系可以用侵犯者的自我他人关注来解释。四项多方法(非实验、实验)、多样本(社区、本科生)研究支持了我们的预测。研究结果在现有的社会动机文献和应用意义的背景下进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验