• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在六个欧洲国家的长期护理机构中,临终关怀中阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药的使用:PACE 的结果。

Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic use in end of life in long-term care facilities in six European countries: results of PACE.

机构信息

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):74-79. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky196.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/cky196
PMID:30285189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6345144/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids, antipsychotics and hypnotics are recommended for comfort care in dying. We studied their prescription during the last 3 days in residents deceased in the long-term care facility (LTCF).

METHODS

In a retrospective, cross-sectional survey in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland, LTCFs, selected by proportional stratified random sampling, reported all deaths over the previous 3 months. The nurse most involved in the residents' care reviewed the chart for opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription, cause of death and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for resident characteristics.

RESULTS

Response rate was 81.6%. We included 1079 deceased residents in 322 LCTFs. Opioid prescription ranged from 18.5% (95% CI: 13.0-25.8) of residents in Poland to 77.9% (95% CI: 69.5-84.5) in the Netherlands, antipsychotic prescription from 4.8% (95% CI: 2.4-9.1) in Finland to 22.4% (95% CI: 14.7-32.4) in Italy, hypnotic prescription from 7.8% (95% CI: 4.6-12.8) in Finland to 47.9% (95% CI: 38.5-57.3) in the Netherlands. Differences in opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription between countries remained significant (P < 0.001) when controlling for age, gender, length of stay, cognitive status, cause of death in multilevel, multivariable analyses. Dying from cancer showed higher odds for receiving opioids (OR 3.51; P < 0.001) and hypnotics (OR 2.10; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription in the dying phase differed significantly between six European countries. Further research should determine the appropriateness of their prescription and refine guidelines especially for LTCF residents dying of non-cancer diseases.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药被推荐用于临终关怀。我们研究了它们在长期护理机构(LTCF)中死亡的居民在最后 3 天的处方情况。

方法

在比利时、英国、芬兰、意大利、荷兰和波兰进行的回顾性、横断面调查中,通过比例分层随机抽样选择 LTCF,报告过去 3 个月内的所有死亡情况。最参与居民护理的护士审查了阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药处方、死亡原因和合并症的图表。进行多变量逻辑回归以调整居民特征。

结果

回应率为 81.6%。我们纳入了 322 家 LCTF 中 1079 名死亡居民。阿片类药物处方范围从波兰的 18.5%(95%CI:13.0-25.8)到荷兰的 77.9%(95%CI:69.5-84.5),抗精神病药物处方从芬兰的 4.8%(95%CI:2.4-9.1)到意大利的 22.4%(95%CI:14.7-32.4),催眠药处方从芬兰的 7.8%(95%CI:4.6-12.8)到荷兰的 47.9%(95%CI:38.5-57.3)。在控制年龄、性别、住院时间、认知状态、多水平、多变量分析中的死亡原因后,各国之间在阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药处方方面的差异仍然显著(P <0.001)。死于癌症的患者接受阿片类药物(OR 3.51;P <0.001)和催眠药(OR 2.10;P = 0.010)的可能性更高。

结论

在临终阶段,六个欧洲国家之间阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药的处方存在显著差异。进一步的研究应确定其处方的适当性,并特别为死于非癌症疾病的 LTCF 居民制定指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c4/6345144/a39184c9ce49/cky196f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c4/6345144/a39184c9ce49/cky196f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c4/6345144/a39184c9ce49/cky196f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic use in end of life in long-term care facilities in six European countries: results of PACE.在六个欧洲国家的长期护理机构中,临终关怀中阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药的使用:PACE 的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):74-79. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky196.
2
Perception of the Quality of Communication With Physicians Among Relatives of Dying Residents of Long-term Care Facilities in 6 European Countries: PACE Cross-Sectional Study.6 个欧洲国家长期护理机构临终居民的亲属对与医生沟通质量的感知:PACE 横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Opioid underuse in terminal care of long-term care facility residents with pain and/or dyspnoea: A cross-sectional PACE-survey in six European countries.长期护理机构中疼痛和/或呼吸困难的终末期患者阿片类药物使用不足:六个欧洲国家的 PACE 调查的横断面研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;34(6):784-794. doi: 10.1177/0269216320910332. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Factors Associated with Perception of the Quality of Physicians' End-of-life Communication in Long-Term Care Facilities: PACE Cross-Sectional Study.与长期护理机构中医生临终沟通质量感知相关的因素:PACE 横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):439.e1-439.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Consensus on treatment for residents in long-term care facilities: perspectives from relatives and care staff in the PACE cross-sectional study in 6 European countries.长期护理机构居民治疗共识:来自 6 个欧洲国家 PACE 横断面研究中亲属和护理人员的观点。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 29;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0459-9.
6
Physician Visits and Recognition of Residents' Terminal Phase in Long-Term Care Facilities: Findings From the PACE Cross-Sectional Study in 6 EU Countries.长期护理机构中医生访视和识别居民终末期的情况:来自 6 个欧盟国家 PACE 横断面研究的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):696-702.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
7
Dying in long-term care facilities in Europe: the PACE epidemiological study of deceased residents in six countries.在欧洲的长期护理机构中死亡:六个国家死亡居民的 PACE 流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7532-4.
8
Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study.六个国家养老院居民临终质量和临终关怀质量:一项流行病学研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1584-1595. doi: 10.1177/0269216318800610. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Technical-efficiency analysis of end-of-life care in long-term care facilities within Europe: A cross-sectional study of deceased residents in 6 EU countries (PACE).欧洲长期护理机构临终关怀的技术效率分析:6 个欧盟国家(PACE)去世居民的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204120. eCollection 2018.
10
Palliative care provision in long-term care facilities differs across Europe: Results of a cross-sectional study in six European countries (PACE).长期护理机构中的姑息治疗提供情况在欧洲各国有所不同:六个欧洲国家(PACE)的一项横断面研究结果。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1176-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861229. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological Treatment for Terminal Agitation, Delirium and Anxiety in Frail Older Patients.老年体弱患者终末期激越、谵妄和焦虑的药物治疗
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;9(2):51. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9020051.
2
The Quality of Dying in Frail Institutionalized Older Patients After Nonoperative and Operative Management of a Proximal Femoral Fracture: An In-Depth Analysis.虚弱的机构化老年患者在股骨近端骨折非手术和手术治疗后的临终质量:深入分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jun;41(6):583-591. doi: 10.1177/10499091231180556. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Pharmacists are initiators in palliative care for patients with rare diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services.2040年将有多少人需要姑息治疗?过去的趋势、未来的预测以及对服务的影响。
BMC Med. 2017 May 18;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0860-2.
2
Guidance on opioids prescribing for the management of persistent non-cancer pain in older adults.老年人持续性非癌性疼痛管理中阿片类药物处方指南。
World J Clin Cases. 2017 Mar 16;5(3):73-81. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v5.i3.73.
3
Frequency and Predictors of Analgesic Prescribing in U.S. Nursing Home Residents with Persistent Pain.
药剂师是罕见病患者姑息治疗的发起者。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jun 8;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02765-8.
4
Terminal care in oldest old dying from COVID-19 in the acute hospital : A multicenter study describing pharmacological treatment in the last 24 h.急性医院中因 COVID-19 而死亡的最年长老人的临终关怀:一项描述最后 24 小时内药物治疗的多中心研究。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Mar;55(2):129-134. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02036-4. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Large differences in the organization of palliative care in nursing homes in six European countries: findings from the PACE cross-sectional study.六个欧洲国家养老院姑息治疗组织的巨大差异:PACE 横断面研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 25;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00827-x.
6
Repeated Administration of Clinical Doses of Tramadol and Tapentadol Causes Hepato- and Nephrotoxic Effects in Wistar Rats.临床剂量曲马多和他喷他多的重复给药对Wistar大鼠产生肝毒性和肾毒性作用。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;13(7):149. doi: 10.3390/ph13070149.
7
Research, recruitment and observational data collection in care homes: lessons from the PACE study.养老院中的研究、招募与观察性数据收集:来自PACE研究的经验教训。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 14;12(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4543-2.
美国患有持续性疼痛的疗养院居民中镇痛药处方的频率及预测因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):286-293. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14512. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
Attitudes of palliative home care physicians towards palliative sedation at home in Italy.意大利姑息性居家护理医生对在家中实施姑息性镇静的态度。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1615-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3581-3. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Prevalence of the Use of Opioids for Treatment of Pain in Persons with a Cognitive Impairment Compared with Cognitively Intact Persons: A Systematic Review.与认知功能正常者相比,认知障碍者使用阿片类药物治疗疼痛的患病率:一项系统评价。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(5):512-522. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160629080735.
6
Care of dying adults in the last days of life .临终成年患者的护理
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;16(3):254-8. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-254.
7
Comparing Palliative Care in Care Homes Across Europe (PACE): Protocol of a Cross-sectional Study of Deceased Residents in 6 EU Countries.欧洲养老院姑息治疗比较研究(PACE):一项针对6个欧盟国家已故居民的横断面研究方案
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):566.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Analgesic use among nursing homes residents, with and without dementia, in Poland.波兰养老院中患有和未患痴呆症的居民的镇痛药使用情况。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Mar 21;11:335-40. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101475. eCollection 2016.
9
Analgesic prescribing patterns in Norwegian nursing homes from 2000 to 2011: trend analyses of four data samples.2000年至2011年挪威养老院的镇痛药物处方模式:四个数据样本的趋势分析
Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):54-60. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv184.
10
Eight-Year Trends in the Use of Opioids, Other Analgesics, and Psychotropic Medications Among Institutionalized Older People in Finland.芬兰机构老年人中阿片类药物、其他镇痛药和精神药物使用的 8 年趋势。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):973-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.