Suppr超能文献

慢性病患者病历中的自我护理能力:一项混合方法的回顾性研究。

Patient capacity for self-care in the medical record of patients with chronic conditions: a mixed-methods retrospective study.

作者信息

Boehmer Kasey R, Kyriacou Maria, Behnken Emma, Branda Megan, Montori Victor M

机构信息

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

Phoebe Family Medicine Residency, Albany, GA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 2;19(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0852-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic conditions must mobilize capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care. In order for clinicians to create feasible treatment plans with patients, they must appreciate the limits and possibilities of patient capacity. This study seeks to characterize the amount, nature, and comprehensiveness of the information about patient capacity documented in the medical record.

METHODS

In this mixed-methods study, we extracted notes about 6 capacity domains from the medical records of 100 patients receiving care from 15 primary care clinicians at a single practice. Using a generalized linear model to account for repeated measures across multiple encounters, we calculated the rate of documented domains per encounter per patient adjusted for appointment type and number. Following quantitative analyses, we purposefully selected records to conduct inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

After adjusting for number of appointments and appointment type, primary care notes contained the most mentions of capacity. Physical capacity was most noted, followed by personal, emotional, social, financial, and environmental. Qualitatively, we found three documentation patterns: patients with broad capacity notes, patients with predominantly physical domain capacity notes, and patients with capacity notes mostly in domains other than physical. Records contained almost no mention of patients' environmental or financial capacity, or of how they coped with capacity limitations. Rarely, did notes ever mention how well patients interacted with their social network or what support they provided to the patient in managing their health.

CONCLUSION

Medical records scarcely document patient capacity. This may impair the ability of clinicians to determine how patients can handle patient work, at what point patient capacity might become overwhelmed leading to poor adherence and health outcomes, and how best to craft feasible treatment programs that patients can implement with high fidelity.

摘要

背景

慢性病患者必须调动自身能力以获取和利用医疗保健服务并进行自我护理。为了让临床医生与患者共同制定可行的治疗方案,他们必须了解患者能力的局限性和可能性。本研究旨在描述病历中记录的有关患者能力信息的数量、性质和全面性。

方法

在这项混合方法研究中,我们从一家诊所的15名初级保健临床医生所诊治的100名患者的病历中提取了关于6个能力领域的记录。使用广义线性模型来处理多次就诊中的重复测量数据,我们计算了根据预约类型和数量调整后的每位患者每次就诊记录领域的比率。在进行定量分析之后,我们有目的地选择记录进行归纳性内容分析。

结果

在调整预约次数和预约类型后,初级保健记录中提及能力的次数最多。身体能力被提及得最多,其次是个人、情感、社会、财务和环境能力。在定性方面,我们发现了三种记录模式:能力记录广泛的患者、主要记录身体领域能力的患者以及能力记录主要在身体领域以外的患者。记录中几乎没有提及患者的环境或财务能力,也没有提及他们如何应对能力限制。记录很少提及患者与社交网络的互动情况或社交网络在帮助患者管理健康方面提供了何种支持。

结论

病历中几乎没有记录患者能力。这可能会削弱临床医生确定患者如何处理患者工作的能力,无法确定患者能力在何时可能不堪重负从而导致依从性差和健康状况不佳,也无法确定如何制定出患者能够高度保真实施的可行治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d3/6169082/c598315b73d0/12875_2018_852_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验