Viegas Carla, Monteiro Ana, Carolino Elisabete, Viegas Susana
Health & Technology Research Centre, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2018 Sep 1;69(3):250-257. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3116.
In bakeries, a number of operations such as mixing are associated with exposure to air-suspended flour dust and related bioburden. The aim of this study was to find the best active sampling approach to the assessment of occupational exposure to bioburden in Portuguese bakeries based on the data obtained with the use of specific impaction and impinger devices. We used impaction to collect fungal particles from 100 L air samples onto malt extract agar (MEA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05 %). For growing fungi we also used dichloran glycerol (DG18) agar-based media and for mesophilic bacteria we used tryptic soy agar (TSA) supplemented with nystatin (0.2 %). For Enterobacteriaceae we used violet red bile agar (VRBA). With impingers we also collected 300 L air samples at the 300 L/min airflow rate, inoculated onto the same culture media. The two methods, impaction and impinger, showed statistically significant differences in the following counts: fungal on MEA (z=-2.721, p=0.007), fungal on DG18 (z=-4.830, p=0.000), total bacteria (z=-5.435, p=0.000), and Gram-negative coliforms (z=-3.716, p=0.000). In all cases the impaction method detected significantly higher concentrations than the impinger method. Fungal and bacterial loads were higher in the production unit and lower in the shop. The fungal load obtained with impaction varied between 10 and 5140 CFU m-3, and total bacterial counts ranged between 10 and 4120 CFU m-3. This study has shown that the impaction method is the best active sampling approach to assessing viable bioburden in this specific occupational environment, but a multi-faceted approach to sampling and analyses combining methods and media enables a more refined risk characterisation and, consequently, better tailored risk control measures to reduce adverse health outcomes in workers.
在面包房里,一些操作(如搅拌)会使人接触到空气中悬浮的面粉粉尘及相关生物负荷。本研究的目的是,基于使用特定撞击式采样器和冲击式吸收管设备所获得的数据,找出评估葡萄牙面包房职业生物负荷暴露的最佳主动采样方法。我们使用撞击式采样器,将100升空气样本中的真菌颗粒采集到添加了氯霉素(0.05%)的麦芽提取物琼脂(MEA)上。对于培养真菌,我们还使用了基于二氯苯胺甘油(DG18)琼脂的培养基,对于嗜温细菌,我们使用了添加了制霉菌素(0.2%)的胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂(TSA)。对于肠杆菌科,我们使用了紫红胆盐琼脂(VRBA)。使用冲击式吸收管时,我们还以300升/分钟的气流速度采集300升空气样本,并接种到相同的培养基上。撞击式采样器和冲击式吸收管这两种方法在以下计数方面显示出统计学上的显著差异:MEA上的真菌(z=-2.721,p=0.007)、DG18上的真菌(z=-4.830,p=0.000)、总细菌(z=-5.435,p=0.000)以及革兰氏阴性大肠菌群(z=-3.716,p=0.000)。在所有情况下,撞击式采样法检测到的浓度均显著高于冲击式吸收管法。生产单元中的真菌和细菌负荷较高,店铺中的则较低。撞击式采样法获得的真菌负荷在10至5140 CFU/m³之间,总细菌计数在10至4120 CFU/m³之间。本研究表明,撞击式采样法是评估这一特定职业环境中活生物负荷的最佳主动采样方法,但结合多种方法和培养基的多方面采样与分析方法能够实现更精细的风险特征描述,从而制定出更具针对性的风险控制措施,以减少对工人健康的不良影响。