Gough Kenyon Sheila M, Palikara Olympia, Lucas Rebecca M
Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom.
School of Education, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Oct 26;61(10):2517-2531. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0416.
Reading comprehension is a key indicator of academic and psychosocial outcomes. Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) tend to find reading comprehension challenging. This study aimed to explore the literal and inferential (cohesive, elaborative, and lexical) comprehension of children with DLD, their typically developing (TD) peers, and, uniquely, a group of children with low language (LL) proficiency.
Children aged 10-11 years with either typical development (n = 16), LL proficiency (n = 14), or DLD (n = 14) were recruited from 8 primary schools. They completed a battery of standardized language and literacy assessments. Responses to literal and inferential questions on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second UK Edition (Wechsler, 2005) were analyzed.
A disproportionate difficulty in answering inferential relative to literal questions was found for the DLD group compared to the LL and TD groups. Children with DLD were significantly poorer at elaborative inferencing than both their peers with LL proficiency and TD peers, but there were no group differences in cohesive or lexical inferencing. There was a significant positive association between inferencing ability and vocabulary knowledge, single word reading accuracy, grammatical skill, and verbal working memory. The importance of single word reading accuracy was especially evident as a partial mediator of the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and inferencing ability.
These results indicate that interventions targeting the reading comprehension of children with DLD should focus on elaborative inferencing skill. There are also clinical implications as the development of new standardized assessments differentiating between inference types is called for.
阅读理解是学业和心理社会成果的关键指标。患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童往往会觉得阅读理解具有挑战性。本研究旨在探究患有DLD的儿童、其发育正常(TD)的同龄人,以及独特的一组低语言(LL)能力儿童的字面理解和推理(衔接性、 elaborative和词汇性)理解。
从8所小学招募了10至11岁的儿童,其中发育正常的儿童(n = 16)、LL能力儿童(n = 14)或患有DLD的儿童(n = 14)。他们完成了一系列标准化的语言和读写能力评估。对韦氏个别成就测验第二版英国版(韦克斯勒,2005年)上的字面和推理问题的回答进行了分析。
与LL组和TD组相比,发现DLD组在回答推理问题相对于字面问题时存在不成比例的困难。患有DLD的儿童在 elaborative推理方面明显比其LL能力同龄人和TD同龄人差,但在衔接性或词汇性推理方面没有组间差异。推理能力与词汇知识、单字阅读准确性、语法技能和言语工作记忆之间存在显著的正相关。单字阅读准确性作为词汇知识和推理能力之间关系的部分中介,其重要性尤为明显。
这些结果表明,针对患有DLD的儿童阅读理解的干预措施应侧重于 elaborative推理技能。由于需要开发区分推理类型的新标准化评估,因此也具有临床意义。