Gough Kenyon Sheila M, Palikara Olympia, Lucas Rebecca M
Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Department of Education Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Nov;57(6):1368-1380. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12761. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
Developmental language disorder (DLD) has clear functional ramifications in the areas of social competency, emotion recognition, emotional well-being and literacy skill, which have been found to persist from childhood to adolescence. These domains are important factors during the transition from primary to secondary school in typical development (TD). Nevertheless, there is a paucity of research on the transition from primary to secondary school for adolescents with DLD and low language (LL) ability.
To investigate the association between psychosocial domains, literacy skill and concerns about school during the transition to secondary school for adolescents with DLD, LL and their TD peers. The first research question examined whether levels of social competency, emotion recognition, emotional well-being and literacy skill predicted school concern for the three groups. The second research question explored the longitudinal relationship between school concern and psychosocial and literacy indicators over the transition.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Participants (aged 10-11 years) with DLD (n = 30), LL ((n = 29) and TD (n = 42) were recruited for this longitudinal study from eight UK primary schools. Standardized language and psychosocial assessments were administered in the spring and summer terms of the final year of primary school, and the autumn and summer terms of the first year in secondary school.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Regression analyses showed pre-transition school concern to be predicted by emotion recognition for the DLD group, by social competence and emotional well-being for the LL group, and by social competence for the TD group. Post-transition concern was predicted by emotional well-being for the LL group; with no significant predictors for the DLD/TD groups. Path analyses revealed an association between literacy skill and emotion recognition for the DLD group. A developmental cascade illustrated a relationship between social competence and emotional well-being for the TD group.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study concludes that transition interventions must be differentiated according to language ability; support for DLD adolescents should focus on emotion recognition skill, provision for LL adolescents should centre on emotional well-being, and TD participants should be particularly supported in the domain of social competence in advance of the move to secondary school. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of the inclusion of a LL group, as their outcomes cannot be predicted using DLD/TD research.
What is already known on the subject There is limited research exploring the transition from primary school to secondary for adolescents with DLD or LL ability. Research on TD has highlighted vulnerable domains at this time. As these key areas are evidenced spheres of difficulty in DLD and LL, there was a strong impetus for this study. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study reveals differences between language ability groups in the predictors of school concern both pre- and post-transition. Concerns of adolescents with DLD were predicted by emotion recognition, those of adolescents with LL were predicted by emotional well-being, and a longitudinal link between social competence and emotional well-being was evidenced for TD adolescents. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study has implications for researchers and clinicians, as a need has been identified for a new clinical group. It also has practical implications for transition support planning for educational practitioners, families and adolescents.
发育性语言障碍(DLD)在社交能力、情绪识别、情绪健康和读写技能等方面有着明确的功能影响,且这些影响从童年持续至青春期。在典型发育(TD)过程中,这些领域是小学向中学过渡阶段的重要因素。然而,针对患有DLD和低语言(LL)能力的青少年从小学向中学过渡的研究却很匮乏。
调查患有DLD、LL的青少年及其TD同伴在向中学过渡期间心理社会领域、读写技能与学校相关担忧之间的关联。第一个研究问题是探究社交能力、情绪识别、情绪健康和读写技能水平是否能预测这三组学生对学校的担忧。第二个研究问题是探讨在过渡期间学校担忧与心理社会及读写指标之间的纵向关系。
从英国八所小学招募了参与这项纵向研究的10至11岁的参与者,其中DLD组(n = 30)、LL组(n = 29)和TD组(n = 42)。在小学最后一年的春季和夏季学期,以及中学第一年的秋季和夏季学期进行标准化语言和心理社会评估。
回归分析显示,对于DLD组,过渡前对学校的担忧可由情绪识别预测;对于LL组,可由社交能力和情绪健康预测;对于TD组,可由社交能力预测。对于LL组,过渡后的担忧可由情绪健康预测;而DLD/TD组则无显著预测因素。路径分析显示DLD组的读写技能与情绪识别之间存在关联。一个发展级联说明了TD组社交能力与情绪健康之间的关系。
本研究得出结论,过渡干预必须根据语言能力进行区分;对患有DLD的青少年的支持应侧重于情绪识别技能,对LL青少年的支持应以情绪健康为中心,对于TD参与者,在进入中学之前应特别在社交能力领域给予支持。此外,本研究强调了纳入LL组的重要性,因为他们的结果无法通过DLD/TD研究来预测。
关于该主题已知的情况 针对患有DLD或LL能力的青少年从小学到中学过渡的研究有限。对TD的研究突出了这一时期的脆弱领域。由于这些关键领域在DLD和LL中均为明显的困难领域,因此本研究具有强大的推动力。本文对现有知识的补充 本研究揭示了语言能力组在过渡前后学校担忧预测因素方面的差异。患有DLD的青少年的担忧由情绪识别预测,患有LL的青少年的担忧由情绪健康预测,并且证明了TD青少年的社交能力与情绪健康之间存在纵向联系。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本研究对研究人员和临床医生具有启示意义,因为已确定需要一个新的临床群体。它对教育从业者、家庭和青少年的过渡支持规划也具有实际意义。