Hart Julia, Hall Michelle, Wrigley Tim V, Marshall Charlotte J, Bennell Kim L
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Walking canes are a self-management strategy recommended for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) by clinical practice guidelines. Ensuring that an adequate amount of body-weight support (%BWS) is taken through the walking cane is important as this reduces measures of knee joint loading.
Seventeen individuals with knee pain who had not used a walking cane before were recruited. A standard-grip aluminum cane was then used for 1 week with limited manufacturer instructions. Following this, participants were evaluated using an instrumented force-measuring cane to assess body weight support (% total body weight) through the cane. Force data were recorded during a 430-metre walk undertaken twice; once before 10 min of cane training administered by a physiotherapist, and once immediately after training. Measures of BWS (peak force, average force, impulse equal to the average cane force times duration, and cane-ground contact duration) were extracted. Using bathroom scales, training aimed to take at least 10% body weight support through the cane.
Before training, the average peak BWS was 7.2 ± 2.5% of total body weight. Following 10 min of training, there was a significant increase in average peak BWS by 28%, average BWS by 25%, and BWS impulse by 54% (p < 0.05). However, individual BWS responses to training were variable. Duration of cane placement increased by 22% after training (p = 0.02). Timing of peak BWS through the cane occurred at 51% of contact phase before training, and at 53% after training (p = 0.05).
A short training session can increase the transfer of body weight through a walking cane. However, more sophisticated feedback may be needed to achieve target levels of BWS.
手杖是临床实践指南推荐给膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的一种自我管理策略。确保通过手杖获得足够的体重支撑(%BWS)很重要,因为这可以减少膝关节负荷的测量值。
1)膝骨关节炎患者通过手杖获得多少体重支撑?2)经过简短的简单训练后,体重支撑的测量值是否会增加?
招募了17名之前未使用过手杖且有膝关节疼痛的个体。然后使用标准握把铝制手杖,按照有限的制造商说明使用1周。在此之后,使用装有传感器的测力手杖对参与者进行评估,以通过手杖评估体重支撑(占总体重的百分比)。在进行两次430米步行期间记录力数据;一次是在物理治疗师进行10分钟手杖训练之前,一次是在训练后立即进行。提取%BWS的测量值(峰值力、平均力、等于平均手杖力乘以持续时间的冲量以及手杖与地面接触持续时间)。使用浴室秤,训练旨在通过手杖获得至少10%的体重支撑。
训练前,平均峰值%BWS为总体重的7.2±2.5%。经过10分钟训练后,平均峰值%BWS显著增加28%,平均%BWS增加25%,BWS冲量增加54%(p<0.05)。然而,个体对训练的%BWS反应存在差异。训练后手杖放置的持续时间增加了22%(p = 0.02)。通过手杖的%BWS峰值出现时间在训练前为接触阶段的51%,训练后为53%(p = 0.05)。
简短的训练可以增加通过手杖转移的体重。然而,可能需要更复杂的反馈才能达到%BWS的目标水平。