Suppr超能文献

膝骨关节炎女性使用对侧与同侧手杖时膝关节力矩的变化。

Changes in knee moments with contralateral versus ipsilateral cane usage in females with knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Chan Grace N Y, Smith Andrew W, Kirtley Chris, Tsang William W N

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, David Trench Rehabilitation Centre, 9B Bonham Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005 May;20(4):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.12.005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative treatment for osteoarthritis often involves educating the patient in methods of decreasing the load transmitted through the diseased joint. The use of a cane is one such method and the correct placement of the cane with respect to an abnormal knee joint is crucial. The purpose of this study was to compare effects on knee moments of force of contralateral versus ipsilateral cane usage in female subjects with osteoarthritic knees.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 14 subjects volunteered for this study. Subjects walked over force platforms while ground reaction force and three-dimensional kinematic data were captured using a Vicon 370 System. The subjects were tested walking: (a) unaided, (b) with ipsilateral cane, and (c) with contralateral cane. Inverse dynamics were employed to calculate temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic variables. Dependent variables included hip and knee frontal plane and sagittal plane moments of force, walking speed, cadence and stride length. Repeated measures ANOVA assessed differences among walking conditions.

FINDINGS

Subjects walked significantly faster in the unaided gait condition owing to a higher cadence. Ipsilateral cane use resulted in significantly larger hip (versus contralateral P=0.018; versus unaided P=0.036) and knee (versus contralateral P=0.043; versus unaided P=0.030) frontal plane peak moments during gait. Contralateral cane placement was associated with the smallest peak knee abductor (P=<0.001) and flexor (P=<0.001) moments. Knee deformity (varus or valgus) did not have any significant effect on any variable possibly due to small sample size.

INTERPRETATION

The results suggest that as is the case for the hip contralateral cane placement is the most efficacious for persons with knee osteoarthritis. In fact, no cane use may be preferable to ipsilateral cane usage as the latter resulted in the highest knee moments of force, a situation which may exacerbate pain and deformity.

摘要

背景

骨关节炎的保守治疗通常包括指导患者采用减轻病变关节所承受负荷的方法。使用手杖就是其中一种方法,而手杖相对于异常膝关节的正确放置至关重要。本研究的目的是比较患骨关节炎膝关节的女性受试者使用对侧手杖与同侧手杖对膝关节力矩的影响。

方法

14名受试者组成的便利样本自愿参与本研究。受试者在测力平台上行走,同时使用Vicon 370系统采集地面反作用力和三维运动学数据。对受试者进行以下行走测试:(a)不借助辅助工具,(b)使用同侧手杖,(c)使用对侧手杖。采用逆动力学计算时空、运动学和动力学变量。因变量包括髋部和膝部额面及矢状面力矩、步行速度、步频和步长。重复测量方差分析评估不同行走条件之间的差异。

结果

由于步频较高,受试者在无辅助步态条件下行走速度明显更快。使用同侧手杖导致步态期间髋部(与对侧相比P = 0.018;与无辅助相比P = 0.036)和膝部(与对侧相比P = 0.043;与无辅助相比P = 0.030)额面峰值力矩显著增大。对侧手杖放置与最小的峰值膝外展肌(P < 0.001)和屈肌(P < 0.001)力矩相关。膝关节畸形(内翻或外翻)对任何变量均无显著影响,可能是由于样本量较小。

解读

结果表明,与髋部情况相同,对侧手杖放置对膝关节骨关节炎患者最为有效。事实上,不使用手杖可能比使用同侧手杖更可取,因为后者导致最高的膝关节力矩,这种情况可能会加重疼痛和畸形。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验