• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者 3 年的临床结果:ABSORB EXTEND 试验的最终结果。

Three-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Final results of the ABSORB EXTEND trial.

机构信息

Instituto de Cardiologia Dante Pazzanese, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27715. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.27715
PMID:30286520
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is still limited data on the very long term clinical outcomes after ABSORB BRS in daily practice. We sought to evaluate the 3 year-performance of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of low/moderate complexity patients enrolled in the ABSORB EXTEND trial.

METHODS

ABSORB EXTEND is a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical study in which 812 patients were enrolled at 56 sites. This study allowed the treatment of lesions ≤28 mm in length and reference vessel diameter of 2.0-3.8 mm (as assessed by on-line QCA). To determine the independent predictors of MACE, a multivariable logistic regression model was built using a stepwise (forward/backward) procedure.

RESULTS

Average population age was 61 years and 26.5% had diabetes. Most patients had single target lesion (92.4%). Adequate scaffold deployment (PSP) was achieved in 14.2% of the cases. At three years, the composite endpoints of MACE and ischemia-driven target vessel failure were 9.2% and 10.6%, respectively. The cumulative rate of ARC definite/probable thrombosis was 2.2%, with 1.2% of the cases occurring after the 1st year. Independent predictors of MACE were hypertension and the need for "bail out" stent.

CONCLUSION

At three-year follow-up, the use of ABSORB in low/moderate complex PCI was associated with low and acceptable rates of major adverse clinical events, despite the infrequent use of the recommended contemporary scaffold deployment technique. However, scaffold thrombosis rate was higher than reported with current generation of metallic DES. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier NCT01023789).

摘要

背景

在日常实践中,关于 ABSORB BRS 非常长期的临床结果仍有有限的数据。我们旨在评估 ABSORB EXTEND 试验中入组的低/中度复杂患者接受 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架治疗的 3 年结果。

方法

ABSORB EXTEND 是一项前瞻性、单臂、开放性临床研究,共 56 个中心入组了 812 例患者。本研究允许治疗长度≤28mm 且参考血管直径为 2.0-3.8mm 的病变(通过在线 QCA 评估)。为了确定 MACE 的独立预测因素,使用逐步(向前/向后)程序构建了多变量逻辑回归模型。

结果

平均人群年龄为 61 岁,26.5%的患者患有糖尿病。大多数患者为单靶病变(92.4%)。仅 14.2%的病例实现了适当的支架扩张(PSP)。3 年时,MACE 和缺血驱动的靶血管失败的复合终点分别为 9.2%和 10.6%。ARC 明确/可能血栓形成的累积发生率为 2.2%,其中 1.2%的病例发生在第 1 年后。MACE 的独立预测因素为高血压和需要“挽救”支架。

结论

在 3 年随访时,尽管支架扩张技术的应用不频繁,但 ABSORB 在低/中度复杂 PCI 中的应用与较低和可接受的主要不良临床事件发生率相关。然而,支架血栓形成率高于目前一代金属 DES 的报告。该研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(唯一标识符 NCT01023789)。

相似文献

1
Three-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Final results of the ABSORB EXTEND trial.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者 3 年的临床结果:ABSORB EXTEND 试验的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27715. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
2
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病:前瞻性 ABSORB DM 比荷卢研究的中期随访。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 9;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z.
3
Efficacy and Safety of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Results of the Absorb Diabetic Substudy.Absorb 依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解支架治疗糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:Absorb 糖尿病子研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent - A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.在日本通过 5 年的随机比较,可吸收生物可降解血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的长期结果。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):733-741. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1184. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
6
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗小血管疾病的比较:COMPARE II、RAI和MAASSTAD-ABSORB研究的倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):E115-E124. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27522. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中期至长期临床结局:BVS Expand 注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1652-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for the treatment of bifurcation lesions - Implications from early clinical experience during daily practice.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架植入术治疗分叉病变——日常实践中早期临床经验的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(5):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
10
Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的经济学结局:ABSORB III 试验 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):774-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Technology and Future Perspectives.生物可吸收支架:当前技术与未来展望
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2020 Apr 29;11(2):e0016. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10402.
2
Multimodality intravascular imaging of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds implanted in vein grafts.植入静脉移植物中的生物可吸收血管支架的多模态血管内成像。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(2):151-157. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.86010. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.
依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病:前瞻性 ABSORB DM 比荷卢研究的中期随访。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 9;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z.
4
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.