Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):476-480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
Ultrahigh therapy use has increased in SNFs without concomitant increases in residents' characteristics. It has been suggested that this trend may also have influenced the provision of high-intensity rehabilitation therapies to residents who are at the end of life (EOL). Motivated by lack of evidence, we examined therapy use and intensity among long-stay EOL residents.
An observational study covering a time period 2012-2016.
New York State nursing homes (N = 647) and their long-stay decedent residents (N = 55,691).
Data sources included Minimum Data Set assessments, vital statistics, Nursing Home Compare website, LTCfocus, and Area Health Resource File. Therapy intensity in the last month of life was the outcome measure. Individual-level covariates were used to adjust for health conditions. Facility-level covariates were the key independent variables of interest. Multinomial logistic regression models with facility random effects were estimated.
Overall, 13.6% (n = 7600) of long-stay decedent residents had some therapy in the last month of life, 0% to 45% across facilities. Of those, almost 16% had very high/ultrahigh therapy intensity (>500 minutes) prior to death. Adjusting for individual-level covariates, decedents in the for-profit facilities had 18% higher risk of low/medium therapy [relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1.182, P < .001], and more than double the risk of high/ultrahigh therapy (RRR = 2.126, P < .001), compared to those with no therapy use in the last month of life. In facilities with higher physical therapy staffing, decedents had higher risk (RRR = 16.180, P = .002) of high/ultrahigh therapy, but not of low/medium therapy intensity. The use of high/ultrahigh therapy in this population has increased over time.
This is a first study to empirically demonstrate that facility characteristics are associated with the provision of therapy intensity to EOL residents. Findings suggest that facilities with a for-profit mission, and with higher staffing of therapists, may be more incentivized to maximize therapy use, even among the sickest of the residents.
在 SNF 中,超高治疗的使用有所增加,但居民的特征并没有相应增加。有人认为,这种趋势也可能影响到生命末期(EOL)居民接受高强度康复治疗的提供。由于缺乏证据,我们研究了长期 EOL 居民的治疗使用和强度。
一项观察性研究,涵盖 2012-2016 年期间。
纽约州养老院(N=647)及其长期死亡居民(N=55691)。
数据来源包括最小数据集评估、生命统计、养老院比较网站、LTCfocus 和区域卫生资源文件。生命最后一个月的治疗强度是衡量治疗效果的指标。个体水平的协变量用于调整健康状况。设施水平的协变量是感兴趣的关键独立变量。使用设施随机效应的多项逻辑回归模型进行估计。
总体而言,13.6%(n=7600)的长期死亡居民在生命的最后一个月接受了一些治疗,设施之间的比例为 0%至 45%。在这些患者中,将近 16%的人在死亡前有非常高/超高的治疗强度(>500 分钟)。调整个体水平的协变量后,营利性设施中的死亡患者接受低/中治疗的风险增加 18%(相对风险比[RRR]为 1.182,P<.001),接受高/超高治疗的风险增加一倍以上(RRR 为 2.126,P<.001),与生命最后一个月没有接受治疗的患者相比。在物理治疗人员配备较高的设施中,死亡患者接受高/超高治疗的风险更高(RRR=16.180,P=.002),但接受低/中治疗强度的风险没有增加。在这一人群中,高/超高治疗的使用呈上升趋势。
这是第一项经验性研究,证明了设施特征与向 EOL 居民提供治疗强度有关。研究结果表明,以营利为目的的设施,以及配备更多治疗师的设施,可能更有动力最大限度地利用治疗,即使是在病情最严重的居民中。