Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):164-173. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14059. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
To evaluate how post-acute care (PAC) transitions affect minority older adults with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD), and the extent to which dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility may attenuate or exacerbate disparities in PAC outcomes. We examined: (1) PAC referrals by race/ethnicity and dual status; (2) individual, hospital, and market-level factors associated with PAC; (3) the association between PAC and outcomes.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: We used the following secondary data: Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF), Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR), Minimum Data Set (MDS), Area Health Resource File (AHRF), hospital Provider of Services (POS) file, and the area deprivation index (ADI).
This observational study consisted of 619,262 community-residing Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with ADRD who had a hospital stay in 2017.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: PAC discharge was to skilled nursing facilities (SNF), home health care (HHC) agencies or home without services. Outcomes were 30-day readmission and death. Multinomial logistic regressions with hospital random effects (RE), stratified by dual eligibility, were fit.
Dual-related differences were significantly larger than race/ethnicity differences in PAC transitions. For example, the difference in the probability of SNF transitions between White and Black patients was 3.2% and 6.8%-points for non-duals and duals, respectively. The difference between non-dual/dual White patients was 21.6% points, and among Black patients 18.0%-points. The adjusted risk of 30-day readmission was 5.6 percentage point higher among non-duals discharged to SNF, compared to home, but such risk among duals was not statistically significantly different. The adjusted probabilities of 30-day mortality were larger for duals and non-duals who transitioned to SNF, compared to those discharged home.
PAC referrals and the resulting outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD are associated with multi-level variables that need to be incorporated in discharge decision making.
评估急性后期护理(PAC)的转变如何影响患有阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症(ADRD)的少数族裔老年人,以及双重医疗保险-医疗补助资格在多大程度上可以减轻或加剧 PAC 结果方面的差异。我们研究了:(1)按种族/族裔和双重身份划分的 PAC 转诊;(2)与 PAC 相关的个体、医院和市场因素;(3)PAC 与结果之间的关联。
数据来源/研究环境:我们使用了以下二次数据:主受益摘要文件(MBSF)、医疗保险提供者分析和审查(MedPAR)、最低数据集(MDS)、区域卫生资源文件(AHRF)、医院提供者服务(POS)文件和区域贫困指数(ADI)。
本观察性研究包括 2017 年在医院住院的 619262 名居住在社区的 Medicare 收费服务(FFS)ADRD 受益人的数据。
数据收集/提取方法:PAC 出院至熟练护理设施(SNF)、家庭保健机构(HHC)或无服务的家庭。结果为 30 天再入院和死亡。采用带有医院随机效应(RE)的多项逻辑回归(RE),按双重资格分层。
PAC 转移中,双重相关差异明显大于种族/族裔差异。例如,非双重和双重患者 SNF 转移概率的差异分别为 3.2%和 6.8%。非双重/双重白人患者之间的差异为 21.6%,黑人患者之间的差异为 18.0%。与出院到家庭的非双重患者相比,出院到 SNF 的非双重患者的 30 天再入院风险高 5.6 个百分点,但双重患者的风险没有统计学意义上的显著差异。与出院回家的患者相比,转至 SNF 的双重和非双重患者的 30 天死亡率的调整概率更高。
ADRD 医疗保险受益人的 PAC 转诊和由此产生的结果与需要纳入出院决策的多层次变量相关。