• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同粪便微生物群移植方案治疗感染的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ianiro Gianluca, Maida Marcello, Burisch Johan, Simonelli Claudia, Hold Georgina, Ventimiglia Marco, Gasbarrini Antonio, Cammarota Giovanni

机构信息

Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Oct;6(8):1232-1244. doi: 10.1177/2050640618780762. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1177/2050640618780762
PMID:30288286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169051/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Protocols for treating recurrent infection (rCDI) through faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are still not standardised. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of different FMT protocols for rCDI according to routes, number of infusions and infused material.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched through 31 May 2017. Studies offering multiple infusions if a single infusion failed to cure rCDI were included. Data were combined through a random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (1150 subjects) were analysed. Multiple infusions increased efficacy rates overall (76% versus 93%) and in each route of delivery (duodenal delivery: 73% with single infusion versus 81% with multiple infusions; capsule: 80% versus 92%; colonoscopy: 78% versus 98% and enema: 56% versus 92%). Duodenal delivery and colonoscopy were associated, respectively, with lower efficacy rates ( = 0.039) and higher efficacy rates ( = 0.006) overall. Faecal amount ≤ 50 g ( = 0.006) and enema ( = 0.019) were associated with lower efficacy rates after a single infusion. The use of fresh or frozen faeces did not influence outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Routes, number of infusions and faecal dosage may influence efficacy rates of FMT for rCDI. These findings could help to optimise FMT protocols in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

通过粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的方案仍未标准化。我们的目的是根据途径、输注次数和输注材料评估不同FMT方案治疗rCDI的疗效。

方法

检索截至2017年5月31日的MEDLINE、Embase、SCOPUS、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。纳入了那些如果单次输注未能治愈rCDI则提供多次输注的研究。通过随机效应荟萃分析合并数据。

结果

分析了15项研究(1150名受试者)。多次输注总体上提高了治愈率(76%对93%),并且在每种给药途径中均如此(十二指肠给药:单次输注治愈率为73%,多次输注为81%;胶囊给药:80%对92%;结肠镜检查:78%对98%;灌肠:56%对92%)。总体而言,十二指肠给药和结肠镜检查分别与较低的治愈率(P = 0.039)和较高的治愈率(P = 0.006)相关。粪便量≤50 g(P = 0.006)和灌肠(P = 0.019)与单次输注后的较低治愈率相关。使用新鲜或冷冻粪便不影响治疗结果。

结论

途径、输注次数和粪便剂量可能影响FMT治疗rCDI的治愈率。这些发现有助于在临床实践中优化FMT方案。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同粪便微生物群移植方案治疗感染的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Oct;6(8):1232-1244. doi: 10.1177/2050640618780762. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
2
Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation - evidence for clinical efficacy.系统评价与荟萃分析:胶囊化粪便微生物群移植——临床疗效证据
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 31;14:17562848211041004. doi: 10.1177/17562848211041004. eCollection 2021.
3
Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy plus vancomycin for the treatment of severe refractory Clostridium difficile infection-single versus multiple infusions.随机临床试验:结肠镜检查加万古霉素治疗严重难治性艰难梭菌感染的粪便微生物群移植-单次与多次输注。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;48(2):152-159. doi: 10.1111/apt.14816. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection: An updated randomized controlled trial meta-analysis.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染:一项更新的随机对照试验荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0210016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210016. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.比较粪便微生物群移植与贝佐妥单抗在降低复发性感染风险方面的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e031145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031145.
6
Simple faecal preparation and efficacy of frozen inoculum in faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection--an observational cohort study.简易粪便制备及冷冻菌液在复发性艰难梭菌感染粪便微生物群移植中的疗效——一项观察性队列研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;41(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/apt.13009. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
7
Predictors of failure after single faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: results from a 3-year, single-centre cohort study.复发性艰难梭菌感染患者单次粪便微生物群移植后失败的预测因素:一项为期 3 年的单中心队列研究结果。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 May;23(5):337.e1-337.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) with Colonoscopy Is Superior to Enema and Nasogastric Tube While Comparable to Capsule for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经结肠镜检查的粪便微生物移植(FMT)优于灌肠和鼻胃管,与胶囊治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染相当:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Feb;66(2):369-380. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection.系统评价与荟萃分析:粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性和难治性艰难梭菌感染的疗效
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):479-493. doi: 10.1111/apt.14201. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
Comparing fecal microbiota transplantation to standard-of-care treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较粪便微生物群移植与复发性艰难梭菌感染的标准治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;30(11):1309-1317. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001243.

引用本文的文献

1
Gut microbiota and tuberculosis infection: interaction and therapeutic potential.肠道微生物群与结核病感染:相互作用及治疗潜力
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2531201. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2531201. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Healthcare-Associated Infection: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Study in North Eastern Romania.医疗保健相关感染:罗马尼亚东北部一项基于医院的回顾性研究
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):1377. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061377.
3
The microbiota, the malarial parasite, and the mice-a three-sided relationship.微生物群、疟原虫与小鼠——一种三边关系。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1615846. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1615846. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluation of the effects of different formulations of protectants on the preservation of the microbiota in fecal microbiota transplantation.不同配方保护剂对粪便微生物群移植中微生物群保存效果的评估。
Int Microbiol. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s10123-025-00663-6.
5
Faecal microbiota transplantation in Crohn's disease: an Australian randomised placebo-controlled trial protocol.粪菌移植治疗克罗恩病:一项澳大利亚随机安慰剂对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e094714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094714.
6
Modulation of the Human Microbiome: Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Microbial Transplants.人类微生物组的调节:益生菌、益生元与微生物移植
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1472:277-294. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-79146-8_17.
7
Advances in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Gut Dysbiosis-Related Diseases.肠道菌群失调相关疾病的粪便微生物群移植研究进展
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Apr;12(13):e2413197. doi: 10.1002/advs.202413197. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
8
Should the Faecal Microbiota Composition Be Determined to Certify a Faecal Donor?是否应该确定粪便微生物群组成以认证粪便捐献者?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;14(23):2635. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232635.
9
Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.粪便微生物群移植对散发性肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 2;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6.
10
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Indications, Methods, and Challenges.粪便微生物群移植:适应症、方法及挑战
J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;62(12):1057-1074. doi: 10.1007/s12275-024-00184-3. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口服胶囊与结肠镜检查递送粪便微生物群移植对复发性艰难梭菌感染的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1985-1993. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077.
2
Complications, effectiveness, and long term follow-up of fecal microbiota transfer by nasoduodenal tube for treatment of recurrent infection.经鼻十二指肠管进行粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性感染的并发症、有效性及长期随访
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Oct;5(6):868-879. doi: 10.1177/2050640616678099. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
3
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection.系统评价与荟萃分析:粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性和难治性艰难梭菌感染的疗效
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):479-493. doi: 10.1111/apt.14201. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Increasing Incidence of Multiply Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States: A Cohort Study.美国多重复发艰难梭菌感染发病率的增加:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;167(3):152-158. doi: 10.7326/M16-2733. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
5
Methods and Reporting Studies Assessing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Systematic Review.方法和报告研究评估粪便微生物群移植:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 4;167(1):34-39. doi: 10.7326/M16-2810. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
How to: Establish and run a stool bank.如何建立和运行粪便库。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Dec;23(12):924-930. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice.临床实践中粪便微生物群移植欧洲共识会议
Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):569-580. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Predictors of failure after single faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: results from a 3-year, single-centre cohort study.复发性艰难梭菌感染患者单次粪便微生物群移植后失败的预测因素:一项为期 3 年的单中心队列研究结果。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 May;23(5):337.e1-337.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Oral Vancomycin Followed by Fecal Transplantation Versus Tapering Oral Vancomycin Treatment for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.口服万古霉素序贯粪便移植与逐渐减少口服万古霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 1;64(3):265-271. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw731. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染患者的粪便微生物群移植
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Sep 5;113(35-36):583-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0583.