• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部伤口裂开的手术管理:接受手术清创并一期缝合患者的愈合结果及影响愈合时间的因素

Operative Management of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence: Outcomes and Factors Influencing Time to Healing in Patients Undergoing Surgical Debridement With Primary Closure.

作者信息

Tilt Alexandra, Falola Reuben A, Kumar Anagha, Campbell Tessa J, Marks Jacob M, Attinger Christopher E, Evans Karen K

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Wounds. 2018 Nov;30(11):317-323. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

PMID:30289765
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Plastic surgeons are often consulted by other surgical teams for management of wound dehiscence following abdominopelvic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether operative debridement and primary closure of abdominopelvic wounds are safe and expeditious for patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a database of patients who underwent operative debridement and closure at a single institution between January 2011 and December 2015 for dehisced abdominal or pelvic wounds acquired from prior obstetric, gynecologic, transplant, plastic, or general surgery procedures.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patient records identified, 43 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time from final debridement and primary surgical closure to complete wound healing was 27 days. Time to healing differed significantly by index procedure type (P = .004), with obstetric procedures requiring the shortest median time (12.0 days) and general surgery procedures requiring the longest (39.5 days). Wound healing took 3.6 times longer for patients with diabetes (P = .046) and 11.4 times longer for patients who experienced delayed superficial wound healing or redehiscence (P = .003). Nevertheless, with the exception of 4 patients who died of other causes, all wounds (39/39; 100%) achieved complete wound closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative debridement and closure of abdominopelvic wound dehiscence through a multidisciplinary team approach with plastic surgery results in expeditious wound healing with minimal complications, and it may be safer and more cost effective than healing by secondary intention.

摘要

引言

其他外科团队在处理腹盆腔手术后的伤口裂开时,经常会咨询整形外科医生。

目的

本研究的目的是确定对患者进行手术清创和一期缝合腹盆腔伤口是否安全且迅速。

材料与方法

对2011年1月至2015年12月期间在单一机构接受手术清创和缝合的患者数据库进行回顾性分析,这些患者的腹部或盆腔伤口裂开是由先前的产科、妇科、移植、整形或普通外科手术引起的。

结果

在确定的163份患者记录中,43例患者符合纳入标准。从最后清创和一期手术缝合到伤口完全愈合的中位时间为27天。愈合时间因索引手术类型而异(P = 0.004),产科手术所需的中位时间最短(12.0天),普通外科手术所需的时间最长(39.5天)。糖尿病患者的伤口愈合时间延长3.6倍(P = 0.046),经历浅表伤口愈合延迟或伤口再裂开的患者延长11.4倍(P = 0.003)。然而,除4例因其他原因死亡的患者外,所有伤口(39/39;100%)均实现完全愈合。

结论

通过整形外科多学科团队方法对腹盆腔伤口裂开进行手术清创和缝合可实现迅速的伤口愈合,并发症最少,并且可能比二期愈合更安全、更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Operative Management of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence: Outcomes and Factors Influencing Time to Healing in Patients Undergoing Surgical Debridement With Primary Closure.腹部伤口裂开的手术管理:接受手术清创并一期缝合患者的愈合结果及影响愈合时间的因素
Wounds. 2018 Nov;30(11):317-323. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
2
Superficial wound dehiscence after median sternotomy: surgical treatment versus secondary wound healing.正中开胸术后表浅伤口裂开:手术治疗与二期伤口愈合
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):672-5. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01594-7.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.清创剂治疗二期愈合手术伤口的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(14):1-131. doi: 10.3310/hta5140.
4
Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing.使用负压封闭引流技术治疗愈合能力受损患者的腹部伤口裂开
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.003.
5
A randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence.浅表伤口裂开患者二期缝合与二期愈合的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):321-4.
6
Effect of semiquantitative culture results from complex host surgical wounds on dehiscence rates.复杂宿主手术伤口的半定量培养结果对伤口裂开率的影响。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Apr;25(2):210-216. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12509. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
7
Outcomes in Fournier's Gangrene Using Skin and Soft Tissue Sparing Flap Preservation Surgery for Wound Closure: An Alternative Approach to Wide Radical Debridement.采用保留皮肤和软组织皮瓣修复术闭合伤口治疗福尼尔坏疽的效果:一种替代广泛根治性清创术的方法
Wounds. 2018 Oct;30(10):290-299.
8
Sternal preservation: a better way to treat most sternal wound complications after cardiac surgery.胸骨保留:治疗心脏手术后大多数胸骨伤口并发症的更好方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1659-64. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.082.
9
Predicting and managing donor-site wound complications in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction: improved outcomes with early reoperative closure.预测和管理腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建术中供区伤口并发症:早期再次手术缝合可改善预后。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000805.
10
Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.筋膜外伤口裂开:深层整块缝合与浅层皮肤缝合对比
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan;83(1):142-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of abdominal wound dehiscence: update of the literature and meta-analysis.腹部切口裂开的处理:文献更新和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):449-462. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02294-4. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Supine versus semi-Fowler's positions for tracheal extubation in abdominal surgery-a randomized clinical trial.仰卧位与半 Fowler 位在腹部手术气管拔管中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01108-5.