University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive tools for monitoring treatment response and disease progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR)-based hepatic imaging measures for the assessment of liver histology in patients with NASH.
We analyzed data from patients with NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis enrolled in a phase II study of selonsertib. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included centrally read MR elastography (MRE)-estimated liver stiffness, MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and liver biopsies evaluated according to the NASH Clinical Research Network classification and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS).
Among 54 patients with MRE and biopsies at baseline and week 24, 18 (33%) had fibrosis improvement (≥1-stage reduction) after undergoing 24 weeks of treatment with the study drug. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of MRE-stiffness to predict fibrosis improvement was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.78) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRE had 67% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, 79% negative predictive value. Among 65 patients with MRI-PDFF and biopsies at baseline and week 24, a ≥1-grade reduction in steatosis was observed in 18 (28%). The AUROC of MRI-PDFF to predict steatosis response was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.83) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRI-PDFF had 89% sensitivity and 47% specificity, 39% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value.
These preliminary data support the further evaluation of MRE-stiffness and MRI-PDFF for the longitudinal assessment of histologic response in patients with NASH.
Liver biopsy is a potentially painful and risky method to assess damage to the liver due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We analyzed data from a clinical trial to determine if 2 methods of magnetic resonance imaging - 1 to measure liver fat and 1 to measure liver fibrosis (scarring) - could potentially replace liver biopsy in evaluating NASH-related liver injury. Both imaging methods were correlated with biopsy in showing the effects of NASH on the liver.
需要非侵入性工具来监测非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)的治疗反应和疾病进展。我们的目的是评估基于磁共振(MR)的肝脏成像测量在评估 NASH 患者肝脏组织学方面的效用。
我们分析了参加塞隆昔布 II 期研究的 NASH 合并 2 或 3 期纤维化患者的数据。在治疗前和治疗 24 周时,分别进行了中心阅读的磁共振弹性成像(MRE)估计的肝硬度、MR 成像估计的质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)和根据 NASH 临床研究网络分类和非酒精性脂肪性肝病活动评分(NAS)评估的肝活检。
在 54 例基线和 24 周时具有 MRE 和活检的患者中,18 例(33%)在接受研究药物治疗 24 周后出现纤维化改善(≥1 期下降)。MRE 硬度预测纤维化改善的受试者工作特征曲线(AUROC)为 0.62(95%CI 0.46-0.78),最佳阈值为≥0%相对减少。在此阈值下,MRE 的敏感性为 67%,特异性为 64%,阳性预测值为 48%,阴性预测值为 79%。在基线和 24 周时具有 MRI-PDFF 和活检的 65 例患者中,18 例(28%)观察到脂肪变性改善≥1 级。MRI-PDFF 预测脂肪变性反应的 AUROC 为 0.70(95%CI 0.57-0.83),最佳阈值为≥0%相对减少。在此阈值下,MRI-PDFF 的敏感性为 89%,特异性为 47%,阳性预测值为 39%,阴性预测值为 92%。
这些初步数据支持进一步评估 MRE 硬度和 MRI-PDFF 用于纵向评估 NASH 患者的组织学反应。
肝活检是一种潜在的痛苦和危险的方法,用于评估非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)引起的肝脏损伤。我们分析了一项临床试验的数据,以确定两种磁共振成像方法 - 一种用于测量肝脂肪,另一种用于测量肝纤维化(瘢痕形成) - 是否可以替代肝活检来评估 NASH 相关的肝损伤。这两种成像方法都与活检相关,表明 NASH 对肝脏的影响。