Suppr超能文献

使用互联无结锚定填充:优于打结技术的生物力学性能?

Remplissage Using Interconnected Knotless Anchors: Superior Biomechanical Properties to a Knotted Technique?

机构信息

University of Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group and Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):2954-2959. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical fixation strength and gap formation of 2 different remplissage fixation methods (double pulley knotted construct and interconnected knotless repair construct) in cadaver specimens.

METHODS

Seven matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders were used for testing (mean age, 56 ± 10 years). A shoulder from each matched pair was randomly selected to receive a Hill-Sachs remplissage using either a knotted (No. 2 FiberWire double pulley with 3.0-mm SutureTak anchors) or knotless (coreless No. 2 FiberWire interconnected between 3.9-mm knotless CorkScrew anchors) double mattress construct. The tendon was cycled between 10 and 100 N at 1 Hz for 100 cycles, followed by a single-cycle pull to failure at 33 mm/s. Cyclic displacement, load to clinical failure (5 mm), yield load, and mode of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

Neither construct demonstrated clinical failure under cyclic loading. Load to clinical failure was higher for the knotless repair than that of the knotted repair (788 ± 162 N vs 488 ± 227 N; P = .003). The yield load was higher for the knotless repair than that of the knotted repair (1,080 ± 298 N vs 591 ± 265 N; P = .008). The most common failure mode for the knotted repair was knot failure or tendon tearing, whereas the failure mode for the knotless repair was by anchor pull-out or tendon tear with no failures occurring via the interconnected suture construct mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

In this biomechanical study comparing cyclic and ultimate loading for 2 double mattress remplissage repairs, the construct using interconnected, knotless sutures outperformed the knotted construct. No failure of the interconnected suture construct mechanism by slippage or breakage was observed in the knotless group.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of the interconnected knotless suture technique might improve the biomechanical strength of arthroscopic remplissage repairs in treating shoulder instability.

摘要

目的

评估两种不同填充物固定方法(双滑结打结构造和互锁无结修复构造)在尸体标本中的生物力学固定强度和间隙形成。

方法

使用 7 对匹配的人尸体肩部进行测试(平均年龄,56 ± 10 岁)。从每对匹配的肩部中随机选择一个进行 Hill-Sachs 填充物填充,使用打结(双滑结,2 号纤维线和 3.0-mm SutureTak 锚钉)或无结(无芯 2 号纤维线,互锁在 3.9-mm 无结 CorkScrew 锚钉之间)双褥式构造。肌腱在 1Hz 下以 10 至 100N 循环 100 次,然后以 33mm/s 的速度进行单次循环拉至失效。记录循环位移、达到临床失效(5mm)的负载、屈服负载和失效模式。

结果

在循环加载下,两种构造均未出现临床失效。无结修复的达到临床失效的负载高于打结修复(788 ± 162N 比 488 ± 227N;P=.003)。无结修复的屈服负载高于打结修复(1080 ± 298N 比 591 ± 265N;P=.008)。打结修复最常见的失效模式是结失败或肌腱撕裂,而无结修复的失效模式是锚钉拔出或肌腱撕裂,没有通过互锁缝线构造机制发生失效。

结论

在这项比较两种双褥式填充物修复的循环和极限加载的生物力学研究中,使用互锁无结缝线的构造优于打结构造。在无结组中未观察到互锁缝线构造机制因滑动或断裂而失效。

临床相关性

使用互锁无结缝线技术可能会提高关节镜下填充物修复治疗肩关节不稳定的生物力学强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验