Department of Neurophysiology, Centre for Biomedicine and Medical Technology Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Dec;160(12):2509-2519. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3669-7. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment option for patients with refractory chronic pain conditions. While effects of SCS on dorsal horn neuronal circuitries are intensively studied, current knowledge on the impact of SCS on descending pain pathways is scarce and relies on preclinical data. We aimed to address this topic and hypothesized a significant effect of SCS on descending pain modulation. In light of current efforts to determine the sensitivity of "static" versus "dynamic" somatosensory parameters to characterize pathophysiological pain conditions, all SCS patients were carefully investigated using both classes of somatosensory outcome parameters.
Descending pain pathways were investigated by using a "Cold Pressor Test." This test enables to evaluate the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) at the individual level. CPM efficacy was assessed in eight neuropathic pain patients (age 55.5 ± 10.6) during the two conditions stimulator "ON" and "OFF." The impact of SCS on "static" and "dynamic" somatosensory parameters was explored by using a quantitative sensory testing (QST) battery.
CPM efficacy on pressure pain sensitivity was nearly absent during "OFF" (- 1.2 ± 5.6% facilitation), but increased significantly to 16.3 ± 3.4% inhibition during "ON" (p = 0.03). While most "static" nociceptive QST parameters, represented by mechanical/thermal pain thresholds, exhibited only small effects of SCS (p > 0.05), the wind-up ratio was strongly reduced to within the normal range during "ON" (p = 0.04; Cohen's d = 1.0). Dynamic mechanical allodynia was abolished in six of seven patients.
Our study provides first human evidence for an impact of SCS on descending pain pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus and emphasizes the significance of "dynamic" pain measures like "CPM"-efficacy and "temporal summation" to evaluate SCS treatment effects. Future prospective studies may use these measures of nociceptive processing to predict SCS therapy response.
脊髓刺激(SCS)是治疗难治性慢性疼痛疾病的一种既定选择。虽然 SCS 对背角神经元回路的影响已得到深入研究,但目前对 SCS 对下行疼痛通路影响的了解甚少,且主要依赖于临床前数据。我们旨在解决这一问题,并假设 SCS 对下行疼痛调节有显著影响。鉴于目前正在努力确定“静态”与“动态”体感参数来表征生理病理性疼痛状况的敏感性,我们使用两类体感结果参数仔细地对所有 SCS 患者进行了研究。
通过“冷加压试验”来研究下行疼痛通路。该试验可评估条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的个体疗效。在两种刺激器“开启”和“关闭”条件下,我们评估了 8 例神经性疼痛患者(年龄 55.5±10.6)的 CPM 疗效。通过定量感觉测试(QST)组来探索 SCS 对“静态”和“动态”体感参数的影响。
在“关闭”条件下,CPM 对压痛敏感性的疗效几乎不存在(减少 1.2±5.6%),但在“开启”条件下,疗效显著增加到 16.3±3.4%的抑制(p=0.03)。虽然大多数“静态”伤害感受 QST 参数(代表机械/热痛觉阈值)仅显示 SCS 的较小影响(p>0.05),但在“开启”条件下,冲动发放比显著降低至正常范围内(p=0.04;Cohen's d=1.0)。在 7 例患者中有 6 例的动态机械性触诱发痛消失。
我们的研究为 SCS 对背外侧索中下行疼痛通路的影响提供了首例人体证据,并强调了“动态”疼痛测量(如 CPM 疗效和“时间总和”)在评估 SCS 治疗效果方面的重要性。未来的前瞻性研究可能会使用这些伤害性处理测量来预测 SCS 治疗反应。