Khavjou Olga A, Turner Patrick, Jones Deborah J
RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Jun;27(6):1950-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0997-9. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
The goal of this study was to assess cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies used to engage low-income families of young children with disruptive behavior disorder to participate in a Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) program. For this analysis, we used data on labor and non-labor resources associated with 13 recruitment strategies implemented in February 2014 through February 2016. We assessed the effectiveness of each strategy as the number of families that enrolled into the study. Cost-effectiveness of each recruitment strategy was expressed as cost per family enrolled; analysis was conducted in 2016. We calculated the cost of total recruitment effort for 13 strategies during the 2-year period to be $11,496 with an average cost of $885 per recruitment strategy or $255 per enrolled family. Across strategies, total costs ranged from $25 to $2,540. "University mass e-mail" and "school flyers" resulted in the most phone screens (34 each); however, only 10% of these families enrolled in the study (3 and 4 families, respectively). "Craigslist" was the most effective strategy with 30 families screened and 11 of them enrolling. Three strategies did not yield any participants. The four strategies with the lowest cost per family enrolled were "Facebook page," "Craigslist," "university mass e-mail," and "organization/agency" (< $90). In conclusion, we found that some recruitment strategies were more successful at engaging low-income families to participate in a BPT program than others. Our results indicate that using a combination of recruitment strategies may be the optimal approach for recruiting low-income families.
本研究的目的是评估用于促使有破坏性行为障碍的幼儿的低收入家庭参与行为家长培训(BPT)项目的招募策略的成本、效果和成本效益。对于此分析,我们使用了与2014年2月至2016年2月实施的13种招募策略相关的劳动力和非劳动力资源数据。我们将每种策略的效果评估为登记参加研究的家庭数量。每种招募策略的成本效益表示为每个登记家庭的成本;分析于2016年进行。我们计算出在这两年期间13种策略的总招募成本为11,496美元,每种招募策略的平均成本为885美元,或每个登记家庭255美元。在各种策略中,总成本从25美元到2,540美元不等。“大学群发电子邮件”和“学校传单”带来的电话筛选最多(各34次);然而,这些家庭中只有10%登记参加了研究(分别为3个和4个家庭)。“克雷格列表”是最有效的策略,有30个家庭接受筛选,其中11个家庭登记参加。有三种策略没有产生任何参与者。每个登记家庭成本最低的四种策略是“脸书页面 ”、“克雷格列表”、“大学群发电子邮件”和“组织/机构”(<90美元)。总之,我们发现一些招募策略在促使低收入家庭参与BPT项目方面比其他策略更成功。我们的结果表明,结合使用多种招募策略可能是招募低收入家庭的最佳方法。