Suppr超能文献

为低收入家庭招募行为父母培训的策略的成本效益

Cost Effectiveness of Strategies for Recruiting Low-Income Families for Behavioral Parent Training.

作者信息

Khavjou Olga A, Turner Patrick, Jones Deborah J

机构信息

RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Jun;27(6):1950-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0997-9. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies used to engage low-income families of young children with disruptive behavior disorder to participate in a Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) program. For this analysis, we used data on labor and non-labor resources associated with 13 recruitment strategies implemented in February 2014 through February 2016. We assessed the effectiveness of each strategy as the number of families that enrolled into the study. Cost-effectiveness of each recruitment strategy was expressed as cost per family enrolled; analysis was conducted in 2016. We calculated the cost of total recruitment effort for 13 strategies during the 2-year period to be $11,496 with an average cost of $885 per recruitment strategy or $255 per enrolled family. Across strategies, total costs ranged from $25 to $2,540. "University mass e-mail" and "school flyers" resulted in the most phone screens (34 each); however, only 10% of these families enrolled in the study (3 and 4 families, respectively). "Craigslist" was the most effective strategy with 30 families screened and 11 of them enrolling. Three strategies did not yield any participants. The four strategies with the lowest cost per family enrolled were "Facebook page," "Craigslist," "university mass e-mail," and "organization/agency" (< $90). In conclusion, we found that some recruitment strategies were more successful at engaging low-income families to participate in a BPT program than others. Our results indicate that using a combination of recruitment strategies may be the optimal approach for recruiting low-income families.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估用于促使有破坏性行为障碍的幼儿的低收入家庭参与行为家长培训(BPT)项目的招募策略的成本、效果和成本效益。对于此分析,我们使用了与2014年2月至2016年2月实施的13种招募策略相关的劳动力和非劳动力资源数据。我们将每种策略的效果评估为登记参加研究的家庭数量。每种招募策略的成本效益表示为每个登记家庭的成本;分析于2016年进行。我们计算出在这两年期间13种策略的总招募成本为11,496美元,每种招募策略的平均成本为885美元,或每个登记家庭255美元。在各种策略中,总成本从25美元到2,540美元不等。“大学群发电子邮件”和“学校传单”带来的电话筛选最多(各34次);然而,这些家庭中只有10%登记参加了研究(分别为3个和4个家庭)。“克雷格列表”是最有效的策略,有30个家庭接受筛选,其中11个家庭登记参加。有三种策略没有产生任何参与者。每个登记家庭成本最低的四种策略是“脸书页面 ”、“克雷格列表”、“大学群发电子邮件”和“组织/机构”(<90美元)。总之,我们发现一些招募策略在促使低收入家庭参与BPT项目方面比其他策略更成功。我们的结果表明,结合使用多种招募策略可能是招募低收入家庭的最佳方法。

相似文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Strategies for Recruiting Low-Income Families for Behavioral Parent Training.
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Jun;27(6):1950-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0997-9. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Helping the Noncompliant Child: An Updated Assessment of Program Costs and Cost-Effectiveness.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Jul;114. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105050. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Helping the Noncompliant Child: An Assessment of Program Costs and Cost-Effectiveness.
J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Feb;24(2):499-504. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9862-7.
6

引用本文的文献

1
Technology-Enhanced BPT for Early-Onset Behavior Disorders: Improved Outcomes for Children With Co-Occurring Internalizing Symptoms.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;53(2):246-259. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2023.2222391. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
A randomized controlled trial of technology-enhanced behavioral parent training: sustained parent skill use and child outcomes at follow-up.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;63(9):992-1001. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13554. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Optimizing Engagement in Behavioral Parent Training: Progress Toward a Technology-Enhanced Treatment Model.
Behav Ther. 2021 Mar;52(2):508-521. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Distilling Common History and Practice Elements to Inform Dissemination: Hanf-Model BPT Programs as an Example.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;19(3):236-58. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0210-5.
3
Technology-enhanced program for child disruptive behavior disorders: development and pilot randomized control trial.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(1):88-101. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.822308. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
4
Does socioeconomic status matter? A meta-analysis on parent training effectiveness for disruptive child behavior.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(3):384-92. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.769169. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
5
Harnessing innovative technologies to advance children's mental health: behavioral parent training as an example.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;33(2):241-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
Behavioral parenting interventions for child disruptive behaviors and anxiety: what's different and what's the same.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Feb;33(1):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
7
Recruitment strategies and costs associated with community-based research in a Mexican-origin population.
Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S94-105. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq076.
8
Patterns of comorbidity, functioning, and service use for US children with ADHD, 2007.
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):462-70. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0165. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
9
10
A dynamic cascade model of the development of substance-use onset.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2009;74(3):vii-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2009.00528.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验