Lattie Emily G, Kaiser Susan M, Alam Nameyeh, Tomasino Kathryn N, Sargent Elizabeth, Rubanovich Caryn Kseniya, Palac Hannah L, Mohr David C
Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 29;20(11):e11050. doi: 10.2196/11050.
The ability to successfully recruit participants for electronic health (eHealth) clinical trials is largely dependent on the use of efficient and effective recruitment strategies. Determining which types of recruitment strategies to use presents a challenge for many researchers.
The aim of this study was to present an analysis of the time-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for eHealth clinical trials, and it describes a framework for cost-effective trial recruitment.
Participants were recruited for one of 5 eHealth trials of interventions for common mental health conditions. A multipronged recruitment approach was used, including digital (eg, social media and Craigslist), research registry-based, print (eg, flyers and posters on public transportation), clinic-based (eg, a general internal medicine clinic within an academic medical center and a large nonprofit health care organization), a market research recruitment firm, and traditional media strategies (eg, newspaper and television coverage in response to press releases). The time costs and fees for each recruitment method were calculated, and the participant yield on recruitment costs was calculated by dividing the number of enrolled participants by the total cost for each method.
A total of 777 participants were enrolled across all trials. Digital recruitment strategies yielded the largest number of participants across the 5 clinical trials and represented 34.0% (264/777) of the total enrolled participants. Registry-based recruitment strategies were in second place by enrolling 28.0% (217/777) of the total enrolled participants across trials. Research registry-based recruitment had a relatively high conversion rate from potential participants who contacted our center for being screened to be enrolled, and it was also the most cost-effective for enrolling participants in this set of clinical trials with a total cost per person enrolled at US $8.99.
On the basis of these results, a framework is proposed for participant recruitment. To make decisions on initiating and maintaining different types of recruitment strategies, the resources available and requirements of the research study (or studies) need to be carefully examined.
成功招募电子健康(eHealth)临床试验参与者的能力在很大程度上取决于高效且有效的招募策略的运用。确定使用何种类型的招募策略对许多研究人员来说是一项挑战。
本研究旨在分析eHealth临床试验招募策略的时间效率和成本效益,并描述一种具有成本效益的试验招募框架。
为5项针对常见精神健康状况干预措施的eHealth试验之一招募参与者。采用了多管齐下的招募方法,包括数字化方式(如社交媒体和克雷格列表)、基于研究登记处的方式、印刷方式(如在公共交通上张贴传单和海报)、基于诊所的方式(如学术医疗中心内的普通内科诊所和大型非营利性医疗保健组织)、市场研究招募公司以及传统媒体策略(如根据新闻稿进行报纸和电视报道)。计算了每种招募方法的时间成本和费用,并通过将入组参与者数量除以每种方法的总成本来计算招募成本的参与者产出率。
所有试验共招募了777名参与者。数字化招募策略在5项临床试验中招募的参与者数量最多,占总入组参与者的34.0%(264/777)。基于登记处的招募策略位居第二,在各试验中招募了总入组参与者的28.0%(217/777)。基于研究登记处的招募从联系我们中心进行筛选以入组的潜在参与者中具有相对较高的转化率,并且在这组临床试验中招募参与者也是最具成本效益的,每人入组的总成本为8.99美元。
基于这些结果,提出了一个参与者招募框架。为了就启动和维持不同类型的招募策略做出决策,需要仔细审查可用资源和一项或多项研究的要求。