• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stenting for intracranial stenosis: potential future for the prevention of disabling or fatal stroke.颅内狭窄血管内支架治疗:预防致残性或致死性卒中的潜在未来。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Jun 18;3(3):140-146. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000158. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
Stenting versus medical treatment in patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a randomised open-label phase 2 trial.症状性椎动脉狭窄患者的支架置入与药物治疗:一项随机开放标签 2 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):606-14. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00017-4. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
5
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:一项多中心注册研究的 1 年结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 May 7;3(3):176-184. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000137. eCollection 2018 Sep.
6
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
7
Vertebral artery stenting to prevent recurrent stroke in symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: the VIST RCT.症状性椎动脉狭窄患者行椎动脉支架置入术预防卒中复发的 VIST RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(41):1-30. doi: 10.3310/hta23410.
8
Wingspan stenting can effectively prevent long-term strokes for patients with severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar stenosis.对于有严重症状性动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉狭窄的患者,翼展式支架置入术可有效预防长期中风。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;22(3):318-24. doi: 10.1177/1591019915623797. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
10
Endovascular treatment of patients with high-risk symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenoses: long - term outcomes.颅内椎动脉狭窄高危症状患者的血管内治疗:长期结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Jun 2;4(4):182-188. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000230. eCollection 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stenting: A Retrospective Case-Series of 216 Consecutive Patients.颅内动脉粥样硬化支架置入术的人口统计学特征及治疗结果:216例连续患者的回顾性病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):125. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010125.
2
Roles of Nontraditional Lipid Parameters for Predicting Restenosis in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis After Endovascular Treatment.非传统脂质参数在预测颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者血管内治疗后再狭窄中的作用。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec;34(4):827-840. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01409-z. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Transcranial Doppler cerebrovascular reactivity: Thresholds for clinical significance in cerebrovascular disease.经颅多普勒脑血管反应性:脑血管疾病的临床意义阈值。
J Neuroimaging. 2024 May-Jun;34(3):348-355. doi: 10.1111/jon.13197. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
4
Association between lipid profile changes and risk of in-stent restenosis in ischemic stroke patients with intracranial stenosis: A retrospective cohort study.颅内狭窄缺血性脑卒中患者血脂谱变化与支架内再狭窄风险的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0284749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284749. eCollection 2023.
5
Commentary On - Rescue Strategies in Anterior Circulation Stroke with Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy (RAFT).关于机械取栓失败的前循环卒中的挽救策略(RAFT)的评论
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):993-994. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1092_21. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Thirty-Day Outcomes of Resolute Onyx Stent for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial.Resolute Onyx 支架治疗症状性颅内狭窄的 30 天结局:与颅内狭窄患者接受支架置入术与强化药物治疗预防卒中复发试验的多中心倾向评分匹配比较。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Jun 1;92(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002338. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
7
Spotlight on clinical strategies of Chronic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Endovascular interventions and external-intracarotid bypasses compared to conservative treatment.聚焦慢性颈内动脉闭塞的临床策略:血管内介入治疗与颈外-颅内旁路手术对比保守治疗
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 8;9:971066. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.971066. eCollection 2022.
8
Influence of angioplasty and stenting on intracranial artery stenosis: preliminary results of high-resolution vessel wall imaging evaluation.血管成形术和支架置入对颅内动脉狭窄的影响:高分辨率血管壁成像评估的初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):6788-6799. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09010-z. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome from angioplasty and stenting for intracranial stenosis.颅内狭窄血管成形术和支架置入的长期临床和血管造影结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jun;164(6):1627-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05110-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis who undergo stenting: Presentation of three cases.定量磁共振血管造影在接受支架置入术的有症状颅内动脉狭窄患者中的应用:三例报告。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;23(2):136-144. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2021.E2020.10.005. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:一项多中心注册研究的 1 年结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 May 7;3(3):176-184. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000137. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Multicenter Prospective Trial of Stent Placement in Patients with Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Stenosis.症状性颅内重度狭窄患者支架置入的多中心前瞻性试验
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):1275-80. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4698. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Thirty-Day Outcome of a Multicenter Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入多中心注册研究的30天结果
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2822-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010549. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.中国症状性颅内重度狭窄血管成形术和支架置入术(CASSISS):一项在中国开展的新的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581778. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial.球囊扩张颅内支架与药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中风险的影响:VISSIT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
7
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
8
Mechanisms of stroke after intracranial angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial.SAMMPRIS 试验中颅内血管成形术和支架置入后中风的机制。
Neurosurgery. 2013 May;72(5):777-95; discussion 795. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318286fdc8.
9
Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).颅内支架置入术治疗颅内狭窄患者的围手术期卒中的详细分析——支架置入与强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发研究(SAMMPRIS)。
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
10
Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial.SAMMPRIS 试验中血管成形术和支架置入术后术者和术式经验对结局的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov;5(6):528-33. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010504. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

颅内狭窄血管内支架治疗:预防致残性或致死性卒中的潜在未来。

Stenting for intracranial stenosis: potential future for the prevention of disabling or fatal stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

New Era Stroke Care and Research Institute, The Rocket Force General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Jun 18;3(3):140-146. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000158. eCollection 2018 Sep.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2018-000158
PMID:30294469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169606/
Abstract

Intracranial stenosis is a common cause of ischaemic strokes, in particular, in the Asian, African and Hispanic populations. The randomised multicentre study Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) showed 14.7% risk of stroke or death in the stenting group versus 5.8% in the medical group at 30 days, and 23% in the stenting group versus 15% in the medical group at a median follow-up of 32.4 months. The results demonstrated superiority of medical management over stenting and have almost put the intracranial stenting to rest in recent years. Of note, 16 patients (7.1%) in the stenting group had disabling or fatal stroke within 30 days mostly due to periprocedural complications as compared with 4 patients (1.8%) in the medical group. In contrast, 5 patients (2.2%) in the stenting group and 14 patients (6.2%) in the medical group had a disabling or fatal stroke beyond 30 days, indicating significant benefit of stenting if periprocedural complications can be reduced. Recently, the results of the Chinese Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis trial and the Wingspan Stent System Post Market Surveillance Study (WEAVE trial) showed 2%-2.7% periprocedural complications. It is time to evaluate the role of intracranial stenting for the prevention of disabling or fatal stroke.

摘要

颅内狭窄是缺血性中风的一个常见原因,特别是在亚洲、非洲和西班牙裔人群中。随机多中心研究支架置入术和强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)显示,支架置入组在 30 天内的卒中或死亡风险为 14.7%,而药物治疗组为 5.8%;支架置入组在中位随访 32.4 个月时的卒中或死亡风险为 23%,而药物治疗组为 15%。研究结果表明药物治疗优于支架置入,并在近年来几乎使颅内支架置入术处于停滞状态。值得注意的是,支架置入组中有 16 名患者(7.1%)在 30 天内发生致残性或致死性卒中,主要是由于围手术期并发症,而药物治疗组中仅有 4 名患者(1.8%)。相比之下,支架置入组中有 5 名患者(2.2%)和药物治疗组中有 14 名患者(6.2%)在 30 天后发生致残性或致死性卒中,表明如果能减少围手术期并发症,支架置入具有显著获益。最近,中国血管成形术和支架置入治疗症状性颅内严重狭窄试验以及 Wingspan 支架系统上市后监测研究(WEAVE 试验)的结果显示围手术期并发症为 2%-2.7%。现在是评估颅内支架置入术预防致残性或致死性卒中作用的时候了。