• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:一项多中心注册研究的 1 年结果。

Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 May 7;3(3):176-184. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000137. eCollection 2018 Sep.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2017-000137
PMID:30294474
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169608/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A multicentre prospective registry study of individually tailored stenting for a patient with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) combined with poor collaterals in China showed that the short-term safety and efficacy of stenting was acceptable. However, it remained uncertain whether the low event rate could be of a long term. We reported the 1-year outcome of this registry study to evaluate the long-term efficacy of individually tailored stenting for patients with severe symptomatic ICAS combined with poor collaterals.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic ICAS caused by 70%-99% stenosis located at the intracranial internal carotid, middle cerebral, intracranial vertebral or basilar arteries combined with poor collaterals were enrolled. Balloon-mounted stent or balloon plus self-expanding stent were selected based on the ease of vascular access and lesion morphology determined by the operators. The primary outcome was the rate of 30-day stroke, transient ischaemic attack and death, and 12-month ischaemic stroke within the same vascular territory, haemorrhagic stroke and vascular death after stenting.

RESULTS

From September 2013 to January 2015, 300 patients (ages 58.3±9.78 years) were recruited. Among them, 159 patients were treated with balloon-mounted stent and 141 with balloon plus self-expanding stent. During the 1-year follow-up, 25 patients had a primary end point event. The probability of primary outcome at 1 year was 8.1% (95% CI 5.3% to 11.7%). In 76 patients with digital subtraction angiography follow-up, 27.6% (21/76) had re-stenosis ≥50% and 18.4% (14/76) had re-stenosis ≥70%. No baseline characteristic was associated with the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

The event rate remains low over 1 year of individually tailored stenting for patients with severe symptomatic ICAS combined with poor collaterals. Further randomised trial of comparing individually tailored stenting with best medical therapy is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01968122; Results.

摘要

背景与目的

在中国进行的一项针对伴有侧支循环不良的症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)患者的个体化支架置入多中心前瞻性注册研究显示,支架置入的短期安全性和疗效是可以接受的。然而,其长期低事件率是否能够持续仍不确定。我们报告了该注册研究的 1 年结果,以评估伴有严重症状性 ICAS 合并侧支循环不良患者个体化支架置入的长期疗效。

方法

纳入了由颅内颈内动脉、大脑中动脉、颅内椎动脉或基底动脉 70%-99%狭窄引起的伴有侧支循环不良的症状性 ICAS 患者。根据术者确定的血管入路的难易程度和病变形态,选择球囊扩张支架或球囊扩张联合自膨式支架。主要结局为 30 天内卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作和死亡以及 12 个月内同一血管区域内缺血性卒中、出血性卒中和血管性死亡的发生率。

结果

2013 年 9 月至 2015 年 1 月,共纳入 300 例患者(年龄 58.3±9.78 岁)。其中,159 例患者接受球囊扩张支架治疗,141 例患者接受球囊扩张联合自膨式支架治疗。在 1 年随访期间,有 25 例患者发生了主要终点事件。1 年时主要结局的概率为 8.1%(95%CI:5.3%至 11.7%)。在 76 例行数字减影血管造影随访的患者中,27.6%(21/76)患者再狭窄≥50%,18.4%(14/76)患者再狭窄≥70%。没有基线特征与主要结局相关。

结论

伴有严重症状性 ICAS 合并侧支循环不良的患者个体化支架置入后 1 年的事件发生率仍然较低。需要进一步进行比较个体化支架置入与最佳药物治疗的随机试验。

试验注册号

NCT01968122;结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/27d76cfdcfd8/svn-2017-000137f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/caebe2c8612c/svn-2017-000137f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/741e57259e61/svn-2017-000137f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/76a26a4d595b/svn-2017-000137f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/27d76cfdcfd8/svn-2017-000137f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/caebe2c8612c/svn-2017-000137f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/741e57259e61/svn-2017-000137f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/76a26a4d595b/svn-2017-000137f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8657/6169608/27d76cfdcfd8/svn-2017-000137f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:一项多中心注册研究的 1 年结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 May 7;3(3):176-184. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000137. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Thirty-Day Outcome of a Multicenter Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入多中心注册研究的30天结果
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2822-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010549. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
Recurrent symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses: safety and efficacy of undersized stents--initial experience.复发性症状性颅内重度狭窄:小号支架的安全性和有效性——初步经验
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):45-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030183.
4
Concomitant Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Increase the 30-Day Risk of Stroke in Patients Undergoing Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Stenting.合并无症状颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄会增加有症状颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄支架置入患者30天的卒中风险。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):479-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis: 30-day results in a high-volume stroke center.症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄的支架置入术:在一个大容量卒中中心的30天结果
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;143:132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
Balloon-mounted versus self-expanding stents for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis combined with poor collaterals.球囊扩张式支架与自膨式支架治疗症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄合并侧支循环不良的疗效比较
Neurol Res. 2019 Aug;41(8):704-713. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2019.1610837. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
7
Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入前瞻性多中心注册研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 8;4(8):e005175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175.
8
Elective stenting for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis presenting as transient ischaemic deficits or stroke attacks: short term arteriographical and clinical outcome.因短暂性缺血性神经功能缺损或中风发作而出现症状的大脑中动脉狭窄的选择性支架置入术:短期血管造影和临床结果
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):847-51. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.019570.
9
Stenting versus medical treatment in patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a randomised open-label phase 2 trial.症状性椎动脉狭窄患者的支架置入与药物治疗:一项随机开放标签 2 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):606-14. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00017-4. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Special Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Artery Occlusion Resulting From Atherosclerotic Disease.针对动脉粥样硬化疾病所致急性大动脉闭塞的特殊血管内治疗
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.108. Epub 2017 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors of restenosis after paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病中紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗后再狭窄的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 24;15(1):18061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02538-2.
2
Drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis study.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗症状性颅内狭窄的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03846-2.
3
Mortality-Related Factors and 1-Year Survival in Patients After Intracranial Stenting for Intracranial Arterial Critical Stenosis and Occlusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Stroke Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries.主要颅内动脉粥样硬化所致的中风
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):502-513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308441.
2
Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial.SAMMPRIS试验中危险因素控制与血管事件的关系。
Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
颅内动脉严重狭窄和闭塞患者颅内支架置入术后的死亡相关因素及1年生存率
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 26;61(3):404. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030404.
4
Comparison of safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: results from a single center.不同血管内治疗对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的安全性和有效性比较:单中心研究结果
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 5;16:1539127. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1539127. eCollection 2025.
5
Endovascular therapy versus best medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内治疗与最佳药物治疗对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Mar 13:23969873251324863. doi: 10.1177/23969873251324863.
6
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of intracranial self-expanding drug-eluting stents for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority clinical trial protocol.颅内自膨式药物洗脱支架治疗症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的安全性和有效性评价:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照、优效性临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e091152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091152.
7
DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease (DR. BEYOND): the protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.药物涂层球囊用于症状性颅内狭窄疾病的血管内治疗(DR. BEYOND):一项多中心随机试验方案
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Apr 29;10(2):e003259. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003259.
8
Alterations in metabolome and lipidome in patients with in-stent restenosis.支架内再狭窄患者代谢组和脂质组的改变。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):e14832. doi: 10.1111/cns.14832.
9
Evaluation of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial in-stent restenosis.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗有症状的颅内支架内再狭窄的评估。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 22;15:1360609. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1360609. eCollection 2024.
10
Endovascular treatment of symptomatic severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with a novel intracranial dedicated drug-eluting stent: a more effective treatment approach.采用新型颅内专用药物洗脱支架对症状性重度颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄进行血管内治疗:一种更有效的治疗方法。
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 22;15:1304524. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1304524. eCollection 2024.
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Thirty-Day Outcome of a Multicenter Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入多中心注册研究的30天结果
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2822-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010549. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial.球囊扩张颅内支架与药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中风险的影响:VISSIT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
6
Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入前瞻性多中心注册研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 8;4(8):e005175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175.
7
Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting before and after SAMMPRIS: "From Simple to Complex Strategy - The Chinese Experience".SAMMPRIS研究前后的颅内血管成形术和支架置入术:“从简单到复杂的策略——中国经验”
Front Neurol. 2014 Jul 14;5:129. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00129. eCollection 2014.
8
Outcomes of tailored angioplasty and/or stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: a prospective cohort study after SAMMPRIS.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化的个体化血管成形术和/或支架置入术的结局:SAMMPRIS之后的一项前瞻性队列研究
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 May;7(5):331-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011109. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
9
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment.动脉粥样硬化性颅内动脉狭窄:危险因素、诊断与治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Nov;12(11):1106-14. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70195-9.