• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两步招募流程优化了FLEX临床试验中的受试者留存率。

Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial.

作者信息

Standiford Debra A, Morwessel Nancy, Bishop Franziska K, Thomas Joan M, Smith Emily, Crandell Jamie, Driscoll Kimberly A, Hunter Christine M, Kichler Jessica C, Maahs David M, Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J, Seid Michael

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Medical School, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Sep 21;12:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005
PMID:30294698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169149/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change Study (FLEX) is a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of an adaptive behavioral intervention to promote self-management and improve glycemic control for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. A two-step recruitment process was used to optimize study retention by facilitating informed decision-making regarding participation.

METHODS

Those who expressed interest at first contact were given more detailed study information followed by telephone calls to the adolescents and their parents to answer questions and explore potential barriers to participation before making a decision regarding study enrollment.

RESULTS

Of 694 eligible adolescents who were invited to participate, 397 (57.2%) expressed interest when initially contacted (Step 1). Upon completion of the follow-up telephone calls (Step 2), 276 (39.8%) still agreed to participate; and 258 (37.2%) enrolled and completed a baseline visit with a parent/guardian. Completion rates for measurement visits remained high throughout the study, with an end-of-study retention rate of 93.4%; and only 12 (4.7%) families withdrew from the study.

CONCLUSION

The two-step recruitment process encourages potential participants to thoughtfully evaluate their willingness to participate, as well as their ability to make a commitment to the full completion of study requirements. When demonstrating the efficacy of a randomized controlled trial, it may be preferable to accept lower recruitment rates in order to optimize retention rates. The additional time and effort required to implement this two-step process is worthwhile. With a high retention rate, we can be more confident that the outcomes of the randomized controlled trial actually reflect the impact of the intervention.

摘要

引言

灵活生活方式促进改变研究(FLEX)是一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在测试一种适应性行为干预措施对1型糖尿病青少年自我管理和改善血糖控制的疗效。采用两步招募流程,通过促进关于参与的知情决策来优化研究保留率。

方法

首次联系时表示感兴趣的人会收到更详细的研究信息,随后会给青少年及其父母打电话,在决定是否参加研究之前回答问题并探讨潜在的参与障碍。

结果

在694名被邀请参与的符合条件的青少年中,397名(57.2%)在最初联系时(第1步)表示感兴趣。在完成后续电话沟通(第2步)后,276名(39.8%)仍同意参与;258名(37.2%)登记并与父母/监护人完成了基线访视。在整个研究过程中,测量访视的完成率一直很高,研究结束时的保留率为93.4%;只有12个(4.7%)家庭退出了研究。

结论

两步招募流程鼓励潜在参与者认真评估他们参与的意愿以及承诺完全完成研究要求的能力。在证明随机对照试验的疗效时,为了优化保留率,接受较低的招募率可能更可取。实施这个两步流程所需的额外时间和精力是值得的。由于保留率高,我们可以更有信心随机对照试验的结果实际上反映了干预的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/107f/6169149/219d2edc4f72/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/107f/6169149/2d1f479abaa9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/107f/6169149/219d2edc4f72/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/107f/6169149/2d1f479abaa9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/107f/6169149/219d2edc4f72/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial.两步招募流程优化了FLEX临床试验中的受试者留存率。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Sep 21;12:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Effect of telephone calls from a centralized coordinating center on participant retention in a randomized clinical trial.集中协调中心电话对随机临床试验参与者保留率的影响。
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):195-201. doi: 10.1177/1740774519894229. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Behavioral Economic Strategies to Improve Enrollment Rates in Clinical Research: Embedded Recruitment Pilot Trial.提高临床研究入组率的行为经济学策略:嵌入式招募试点试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 21;7:e47121. doi: 10.2196/47121.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study.招募与留存:E-OPTIMAL研究中视频增强版与标准同意流程的随机对照试验
Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):481-489. doi: 10.1177/1740774519865541. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Factors Associated with Recruitment and Retention in Randomized Controlled Trials of Behavioral Interventions for Patients with Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患儿行为干预随机对照试验中与招募和留存相关的因素
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2016 Jun;23(2):112-25. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9448-1.
7
Motivation, recruitment, and screening of volunteers for a phase I/II HIV preventive vaccine trial in Thailand.泰国一项I/II期HIV预防性疫苗试验中志愿者的招募动机、招募及筛选
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 Jun 1;18(2):171-7. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199806010-00009.
8
Guideline implementation in the Canadian chiropractic setting: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial and parallel study.加拿大整脊治疗环境中的指南实施:一项试点整群随机对照试验及平行研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jul 17;27:31. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0253-z. eCollection 2019.
9
[Study of the factors motivating refusal of women to participate to a randomized clinical trial in gynecological surgery. Retrospective observational bicentric study].[关于女性拒绝参与妇科手术随机临床试验的影响因素研究。回顾性双中心观察性研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Nov;45(9):1054-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial.“家庭风格”随机对照试验中招募和留住家长的营销计划及成果指标。
Trials. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2262-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating health literacy principles into the adaptation of a methods motivational interviewing approach for enrolling black adults in a pilot randomized trial.将健康素养原则纳入一种方法的调整中,该方法采用动机性访谈法,用于招募黑人成年人参与一项试点随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 9;15(1):4833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89413-2.
2
The Intestinal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Association with Advanced Metrics of Glycemia and Adiposity Among Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity.1型糖尿病合并超重或肥胖的年轻成年人中肠道微生物群和短链脂肪酸与血糖和肥胖的高级指标的关系
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Oct 30;6(10):nzac107. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac107. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
2
The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change (FLEX) intervention for self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Trial design and baseline characteristics.1型糖尿病青少年自我管理的灵活生活方式促进改变(FLEX)干预:试验设计与基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
3
12. Children and Adolescents: .
Design of the Advancing Care for Type 1 Diabetes and Obesity Network energy metabolism and sequential multiple assignment randomized trial nutrition pilot studies: An integrated approach to develop weight management solutions for individuals with type 1 diabetes.
推进 1 型糖尿病和肥胖症网络能量代谢和序贯多分配随机试验营养先导研究的设计:一种为 1 型糖尿病患者开发体重管理解决方案的综合方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;117:106765. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106765. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
Methods-Motivational Interviewing Approach for Enhanced Retention and Attendance.方法-增强保留和参与的动机访谈方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.005.
5
Understanding adolescent and parent acceptability and feasibility experience in a large Type 1 diabetes mellitus behavioural trial.理解大型 1 型糖尿病行为试验中青少年和家长的可接受性和可行性经验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1134-1145. doi: 10.1111/dme.13913. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
12. 儿童和青少年: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S126-S136. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S012.
4
Evidence-based behavioral interventions to promote diabetes management in children, adolescents, and families.基于证据的行为干预措施,以促进儿童、青少年及其家庭的糖尿病管理。
Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):590-601. doi: 10.1037/a0040359.
5
Factors Associated with Recruitment and Retention in Randomized Controlled Trials of Behavioral Interventions for Patients with Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患儿行为干预随机对照试验中与招募和留存相关的因素
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2016 Jun;23(2):112-25. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9448-1.
6
Research START: A Multimethod Study of Barriers and Accelerators of Recruiting Research Participants.研究启动:招募研究参与者的障碍与促进因素的多方法研究
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):647-54. doi: 10.1111/cts.12351. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness.针对患有慢性病的儿童和青少年家长的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;4(4):CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub3.
8
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes.2014年国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)临床实践共识指南。糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制的评估与监测
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 20:102-14. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12190.
9
Motivational interviewing to promote adherence behaviors in pediatric type 1 diabetes.采用动机性访谈促进1型糖尿病患儿的依从行为。
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Oct;14(10):531. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0531-z.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.