• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃旁路术作为第三种减重手术——我们 42 例的经验。

Gastric Bypass as a Third Bariatric Procedure-Our Experience with 42 Cases.

机构信息

General Surgery Division, The Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3503-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3503-6
PMID:30294768
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is not uncommon to encounter patients seeking a third, fourth, or even fifth bariatric procedure. With higher expected complication rates and questionable patient benefit, the indication for multiple revisions is still in doubt. To evaluate the perioperative and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing gastric bypass after two previous bariatric surgeries or more.

METHODS

We identified all patients that underwent gastric bypass following at least 2 previous bariatric surgeries. We looked at patient demographics, previous bariatric surgeries, pre-operative body mass index (BMI) and obesity-related co-morbidities, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), re-admissions and re-operations, percentage of excess weight loss, and resolution or improvement in comorbidities.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, the majority being females (31, 73.8%). Average age was 45.6 years (range 27-62), average weight and BMI was 116 kg (range 75-175 kg) and 41.1 kg/m (range 25.6-58.7 kg/m), respectively. Thirty-two patients had two previous bariatric surgeries (73.8%), and 10 patients had 3 former bariatric surgeries (23.8%), and for one patient, this was the fifth bariatric procedure (2.4%). Mean LOS was 10 days (range 2-56 days). Eight patients (19%) needed re-admission and 5 (11.9%) needed re-operation. At a median follow up of 48 months (range 7-99 months), the average BMI was 34.5 kg/m (range 23.7-55.1 kg/m) reflecting an excess BMI loss of 43.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric bypass as a third or more bariatric procedure is effective yet associated with high complication rates, re-admissions, and re-operations.

摘要

背景

遇到寻求第三次、第四次甚至第五次减重手术的患者并不罕见。由于预期并发症发生率较高且患者获益存在疑问,多次手术的适应证仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估至少接受过两次减重手术的患者行胃旁路术的围手术期和术后结局。

方法

我们确定了所有至少接受过两次减重手术且再次接受胃旁路术的患者。我们观察了患者的人口统计学特征、既往减重手术史、术前体重指数(BMI)和肥胖相关合并症、围手术期并发症、住院时间(LOS)、再入院和再次手术、超重减轻百分比以及合并症的缓解或改善情况。

结果

42 名患者符合纳入标准,其中大多数为女性(31 例,73.8%)。平均年龄为 45.6 岁(范围 27-62 岁),平均体重和 BMI 分别为 116kg(范围 75-175kg)和 41.1kg/m²(范围 25.6-58.7kg/m²)。32 名患者接受过两次减重手术(73.8%),10 名患者接受过三次减重手术(23.8%),1 名患者接受过五次减重手术(2.4%)。平均 LOS 为 10 天(范围 2-56 天)。8 名患者(19%)需要再次入院,5 名患者(11.9%)需要再次手术。中位随访时间为 48 个月(范围 7-99 个月),平均 BMI 为 34.5kg/m²(范围 23.7-55.1kg/m²),反映了超重减轻 43.3%。

结论

胃旁路术作为第三次或更多次减重手术是有效的,但与高并发症发生率、再入院和再次手术相关。

相似文献

1
Gastric Bypass as a Third Bariatric Procedure-Our Experience with 42 Cases.胃旁路术作为第三种减重手术——我们 42 例的经验。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3503-6.
2
Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.针对限制性手术失败的翻修性胃旁路手术:单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路手术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):970-975. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0.
3
Revisional Malabsorptive Bariatric Surgery: 29-Year Follow-up in a Brazilian Public Hospital.修订型吸收不良性减重手术:巴西公立医院 29 年随访结果。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1504-1510. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3023-9.
4
Impact of Laparoscopic Banded Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss Surgery Outcomes: 5 Years' Experience.腹腔镜带环胃旁路术对减重手术效果的影响:5 年经验。
Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):630-639. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04229-0.
5
Outcomes of Reoperation After Laparoscopic Gastric Plication Failure.腹腔镜胃折叠术失败后的再手术结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):376-386. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3522-3.
6
Weight loss outcome of revisional bariatric operations varies according to the primary procedure.减重手术翻修术的减重效果因初次手术方式而异。
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):227-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181820cdf.
7
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Revisions in Singapore: a 10-Year Experience.新加坡腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的翻修:十年经验
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1069-74. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1852-y.
8
Increased Incidence of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis After Bariatric Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Previous Bariatric Surgery: a Single Center Experience.减重手术史患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后胆石症发病率增加:单中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):846-850. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04366-6.
9
A Retrospective Comparative Study of Primary Versus Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Long-Term Results.初次与翻修Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术的回顾性比较研究:长期结果
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3186-z.
10
Revisional bariatric surgery due to failure of the initial technique: 25 years of experience in a specialized Unit of Obesity Surgery in Spain.因初次手术技术失败而进行的减重手术翻修:西班牙一家肥胖症外科专科医院25年的经验
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;97(10):568-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The outcomes of Re-Redo bariatric surgery-results from multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS).再次行减重手术的结果——来自波兰多中心减重手术再手术研究(PROSS)的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52817-7.
2
Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and or Insufficient Weight-Loss: a Comparative Study.胃食管反流病和/或减重不足行袖状胃切除术后再次行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项对比研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Oct;33(10):3077-3089. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06784-z. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Challenges in Bariatric Surgery: Outcomes in Patients Having Three or More Bariatric Procedures.

本文引用的文献

1
Converting a Sleeve Gastrectomy to a Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure-Is It Worth It?将袖状胃切除术转换为胃旁路手术以治疗减肥失败——这值得吗?
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):364-368. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2856-6.
2
Sleeve gastrectomy: have we finally found the holy grail of bariatric surgery? A review of the literature.袖状胃切除术:我们终于找到了减肥手术的圣杯了吗?文献综述。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Dec;20(23):4930-4942.
3
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
减重手术面临的挑战:三次或以上减重手术患者的结局。
Obes Surg. 2022 Oct;32(10):3257-3263. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06248-w. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Revisional Surgeries of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的修复手术
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Feb 10;14:575-588. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S295162. eCollection 2021.
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
4
Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery.减重手术翻修中失败定义的系统评价
Obes Surg. 2015 Mar;25(3):571-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1541-2.
5
Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force.减重手术再次手术的系统评价:美国代谢与减重外科学会修订特别工作组
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-72. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
6
High failure rate of the laparoscopic-adjustable gastric band as a primary bariatric procedure.作为主要减肥手术的腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败率高。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1070-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
7
Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications.减重手术后体重减轻失败和并发症的再次手术。
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1766-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1012-1.
8
Effect of primary versus revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: inferior weight loss of revisional surgery after gastric banding.初次与再次 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的效果:胃旁路术后胃带调整的再次手术减重效果较差。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Mar-Apr;9(2):253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.01.022. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
9
Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes.肥胖伴糖尿病患者的减肥手术与强化内科治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1567-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
10
Revisional bariatric surgery: who, what, where, and when?减重手术的再次手术:谁、什么、哪里和何时?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 4.