Suppr超能文献

当前错配修复缺陷肿瘤检测实践与能力:澳大利亚病理服务机构调查

Current mismatch repair deficiency tumor testing practices and capabilities: A survey of Australian pathology providers.

作者信息

Mascarenhas Lyon, Shanley Susan, Mitchell Gillian, Spurdle Amanda B, Macrae Finlay, Pachter Nicholas, Buchanan Daniel D, Ward Robyn L, Fox Stephen, Duxbury Elaine, Driessen Rebecca, Boussioutas Alex

机构信息

Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;14(6):417-425. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13076. Epub 2018 Oct 7.

Abstract

AIM & METHODS: An electronic survey of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia accredited pathology services was conducted to assess Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices and to identify barriers and capabilities to screen newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial tumors in Australia.

RESULTS

Australia lacks a national policy for universal mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) testing of incident colorectal and endometrial tumors cases. Routine Lynch syndrome tumor screening program for colorectal and/or endometrial tumors was applied by 95% (37/39) of laboratories. Tumor dMMR screening methods varied; MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone was undertaken by 77% of 39 laboratories, 18% performed both IHC and microsatellite instability testing, 5% did not have the capacity to perform in-house testing. For colorectal tumors, 47% (17/36) reported following a universal approach without age limit, 30% (11/36) tested only "red flag" cases; 6% (3/36) on clinician request only. For endometrial tumors, 37% (12/33) reported clinician request generated testing, 27% (9/33) were screening only "red flag" cases, and 12% (4/33) carried out universal screening without an age criteria. BRAF V600E mutation testing of colorectal tumors demonstrating aberrant MLH1 protein expression by IHC was the most common secondary tumor test, with 53% of laboratories performing the test; 15% of laboratories also applied the BRAF V600E test to endometrial tumors with aberrant MLH1 expression despite no evidence for its utility. Tumor testing for MLH1 promoter methylation was performed by less than 15% laboratories.

CONCLUSION

Although use of tumor screening for evidence of dMMR is widely available, protocols for its use in Australia vary widely. This national survey provides a snapshot of the current availability and practice of tumor dMMR screening and identifies the need for a uniform national testing policy.

摘要

目的与方法

对澳大利亚皇家病理学家学院认可的病理学服务机构进行了一项电子调查,以评估林奇综合征肿瘤筛查实践,并确定在澳大利亚对新诊断的结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌肿瘤进行筛查的障碍与能力。

结果

澳大利亚缺乏针对偶发性结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌病例进行普遍错配修复缺陷(dMMR)检测的国家政策。95%(37/39)的实验室实施了结直肠癌和/或子宫内膜癌的常规林奇综合征肿瘤筛查计划。肿瘤dMMR筛查方法各不相同;39个实验室中有77%仅采用错配修复蛋白免疫组织化学(IHC)方法,18%同时进行了IHC和微卫星不稳定性检测,5%没有内部检测能力。对于结直肠癌,47%(17/36)报告采用无年龄限制的通用方法,30%(11/36)仅检测“红旗”病例;6%(3/36)仅根据临床医生要求进行检测。对于子宫内膜癌,37%(12/33)报告根据临床医生要求进行检测,27%(9/33)仅筛查“红旗”病例,12%(4/33)进行无年龄标准的通用筛查。对通过IHC显示MLH1蛋白表达异常的结直肠癌进行BRAF V600E突变检测是最常见的继发性肿瘤检测,53%的实验室进行了该检测;15%的实验室尽管没有证据表明其有用性,但也对MLH1表达异常的子宫内膜癌应用了BRAF V600E检测。不到15%的实验室进行了MLH1启动子甲基化的肿瘤检测。

结论

尽管广泛采用肿瘤筛查以获取dMMR证据,但澳大利亚其使用方案差异很大。这项全国性调查提供了当前肿瘤dMMR筛查的可用性和实践情况的概况,并确定了制定统一的国家检测政策的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验