• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对新发结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征系统检测的预测影响和成本效益。

The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.

机构信息

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.

Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2020 Feb;212(2):72-81. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50356. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

DOI:10.5694/mja2.50356
PMID:31595523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7027559/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the health impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) in people with incident colorectal cancer (CRC) in Australia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We investigated the impact of LS testing strategies in a micro-simulation model (Policy1-Lynch), explicitly modelling the cost of testing all patients diagnosed with incident CRC during 2017, with detailed modelling of outcomes for patients identified as LS carriers (probands) and their at-risk relatives throughout their lifetimes. For people with confirmed LS, we modelled ongoing colonoscopic surveillance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost-effectiveness of six universal tumour testing strategies (testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiencies) and of universal germline gene panel testing of patients with incident CRC; impact on cost-effectiveness of restricting testing by age at CRC diagnosis (all ages, under 50/60/70 years) and of colonoscopic surveillance interval (one, two years).

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness ratio of universal tumour testing strategies (annual colonoscopic surveillance, no testing age limit) compared with no testing ranged from $28 915 to $31 904/life-year saved (LYS) (indicative willingness-to-pay threshold: $30 000-$50 000/LYS). These strategies could avert 184-189 CRC deaths with an additional 30 597-31 084 colonoscopies over the lifetimes of 1000 patients with incident CRC with LS and 1420 confirmed LS carrier relatives (164-166 additional colonoscopies/death averted). The most cost-effective strategy was immunohistochemistry and BRAF V600E testing (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER], $28 915/LYS). Universal germline gene panel testing was not cost-effective compared with universal tumour testing strategies (ICER, $2.4 million/LYS). Immunohistochemistry and BRAF V600E testing was cost-effective at all age limits when paired with 2-yearly colonoscopic surveillance (ICER, $11 525-$32 153/LYS), and required 4778-15 860 additional colonoscopies to avert 46-181 CRC deaths (88-103 additional colonoscopies/death averted).

CONCLUSIONS

Universal tumour testing strategies for guiding germline genetic testing of people with incident CRC for LS in Australia are likely to be cost-effective compared with no testing. Universal germline gene panel testing would not currently be cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估在澳大利亚对新发结直肠癌(CRC)患者进行林奇综合征(LS)系统检测的健康影响和成本效益。

设计、地点、参与者:我们在一个微观模拟模型(Policy1-Lynch)中研究了 LS 检测策略的影响,该模型明确地对 2017 年所有新发 CRC 患者的检测成本进行建模,对确定为 LS 携带者(先证者)及其高危亲属的患者的终生结局进行详细建模。对于确诊为 LS 的患者,我们对持续的结肠镜监测进行了建模。

主要结果测量

六种通用肿瘤检测策略(检测 DNA 错配修复缺陷)和对新发 CRC 患者进行通用种系基因谱检测的成本效益;通过 CRC 诊断时的年龄(所有年龄、<50/60/70 岁)和结肠镜监测间隔(1 年、2 年)限制检测对成本效益的影响。

结果

与不检测相比,通用肿瘤检测策略(每年结肠镜监测,无检测年龄限制)的成本效益比为 28915 美元至 31904 美元/生命年(LYS)(表示意愿支付阈值:30000 美元至 50000 美元/ LYS)。这些策略可以在 1000 名患有 LS 和 1420 名确诊 LS 携带者亲属的新发 CRC 患者的一生中避免 184-189 例 CRC 死亡,并增加 30597-31084 次结肠镜检查(每例额外 164-166 次结肠镜检查/避免死亡)。最具成本效益的策略是免疫组织化学和 BRAF V600E 检测(增量成本效益比 [ICER],28915 美元/ LYS)。与通用肿瘤检测策略相比,通用种系基因谱检测不具有成本效益(ICER,240 万美元/ LYS)。当与 2 年一次的结肠镜监测相结合时,免疫组织化学和 BRAF V600E 检测在所有年龄限制下均具有成本效益(ICER,11525 美元至 32153 美元/ LYS),需要进行 4778-15860 次额外的结肠镜检查,以避免 46-181 例 CRC 死亡(88-103 例额外结肠镜检查/避免死亡)。

结论

与不检测相比,澳大利亚对新发 CRC 患者进行 LS 指导种系基因检测的通用肿瘤检测策略可能具有成本效益。通用种系基因谱检测目前不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.对新发结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征系统检测的预测影响和成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2020 Feb;212(2):72-81. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50356. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
2
A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征诊断策略的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580.
3
Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(51):1-238. doi: 10.3310/hta21510.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.台湾林奇综合征不同基因检测策略的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160599. eCollection 2016.
5
The predicted effect and cost-effectiveness of tailoring colonoscopic surveillance according to mismatch repair gene in patients with Lynch syndrome.根据林奇综合征患者错配修复基因量身定制结肠镜监测的预测效果和成本效益。
Genet Med. 2022 Sep;24(9):1831-1846. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.结直肠癌患者中林奇综合征的识别策略:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):69-79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00002.
7
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.澳大利亚结直肠癌人群中林奇综合征筛查的成本和结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1737-1744. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14154. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.林奇综合征的通用筛查与靶向筛查:基于临床经验比较确诊率和成本
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4218-y. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.意大利林奇综合征遗传诊断策略的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235038. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征筛查策略的比较有效性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 20;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv005. Print 2015 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing risk-reducing surgery and aspirin decision aids for Lynch syndrome carriers using the person-based approach: A think-aloud interview study.采用基于个体的方法优化林奇综合征携带者的降低风险手术和阿司匹林决策辅助工具:一项出声思考访谈研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70089. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70089.
2
The Cost Effectiveness of Genomic Medicine in Cancer Control: A Systematic Literature Review.基因组医学在癌症控制中的成本效益:一项系统文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):359-393. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00949-w. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework.将偏好纳入基因组医学健康经济模型的方法:批判性解释性综合与概念框架
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):337-358. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00945-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
Improving Lynch syndrome detection: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial.改善林奇综合征检测:一项混合型III期有效性-实施试验的混合方法过程评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11857-5.
5
Nationwide Real-World Data of Microsatellite Instability and/or Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Cancer: Prevalence and Testing Patterns.癌症中微卫星不稳定性和/或错配修复缺陷的全国真实世界数据:患病率和检测模式
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 22;14(11):1076. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111076.
6
Clinicopathological characteristics of Lynch-like syndrome.林奇样综合征的临床病理特征。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul;29(7):944-952. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02527-x. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
7
Direct image to subtype prediction for brain tumors using deep learning.使用深度学习对脑肿瘤进行直接图像到亚型预测。
Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Nov 1;5(1):vdad139. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad139. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.西班牙转移性结直肠癌患者中微卫星不稳定性和错配修复缺陷检测模式的真实世界研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Apr;26(4):864-871. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03309-z. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
9
Economic evaluations of predictive genetic testing: A scoping review.预测性基因检测的经济学评价:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0276572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276572. eCollection 2023.
10
The Risk-Reducing Effect of Aspirin in Lynch Syndrome Carriers: Development and Evaluation of an Educational Leaflet.阿司匹林对林奇综合征携带者的风险降低作用:一份教育传单的编制与评估
Adv Genet (Hoboken). 2022 Mar 7;3(2):2100046. doi: 10.1002/ggn2.202100046. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Lack of association between screening interval and cancer stage in Lynch syndrome may be accounted for by over-diagnosis; a prospective Lynch syndrome database report.林奇综合征筛查间隔与癌症分期之间缺乏关联可能是过度诊断所致;一项前瞻性林奇综合征数据库报告
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019 Feb 28;17:8. doi: 10.1186/s13053-019-0106-8. eCollection 2019.
2
Current mismatch repair deficiency tumor testing practices and capabilities: A survey of Australian pathology providers.当前错配修复缺陷肿瘤检测实践与能力:澳大利亚病理服务机构调查
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;14(6):417-425. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13076. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
3
No Difference in Colorectal Cancer Incidence or Stage at Detection by Colonoscopy Among 3 Countries With Different Lynch Syndrome Surveillance Policies.在结直肠癌筛查策略不同的 3 个国家,通过结肠镜检查发现的结直肠癌发病率或分期无差异。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1400-1409.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
4
Colorectal Cancer Stratification in the Routine Clinical Pathway: A District General Hospital Experience.常规临床路径中的结直肠癌分层:一家地区综合医院的经验
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 Jul;27(6):e54-e62. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000631.
5
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.澳大利亚结直肠癌人群中林奇综合征筛查的成本和结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1737-1744. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14154. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的长期获益、危害和成本效益的评估:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Jul;2(7):e331-e340. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30105-6. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
7
Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(51):1-238. doi: 10.3310/hta21510.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征诊断策略的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580.
9
ColoSeq provides comprehensive lynch and polyposis syndrome mutational analysis using massively parallel sequencing.ColoSeq 采用大规模平行测序提供全面的 Lynch 和息肉病综合征突变分析。
J Mol Diagn. 2012 Jul;14(4):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 May 30.
10
Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中 MLH1、MSH2 和 MSH6 基因种系突变与癌症风险的相关性。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2304-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.743.