a Department of Psychology , Florida International University , Miami , FL , USA.
Memory. 2019 Apr;27(4):495-506. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1529247. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
To stem the spread of infectious diseases (e.g., Ebola), epidemiologists conduct contact tracing interviews (CTIs) with infected individuals regarding their contacts who may also be infected. These contact tracing interviews, however, may be vulnerable to deadly errors of omission. A promising technique to maximise recall is the Cognitive Interview (CI), which is grounded in psychological theory. In the present study, participants imagined they were infected with meningococcal meningitis and reported their contacts over the previous three days during either a control interview or a CI. To model the cognitive impairment associated with being sick, half of the participants were interviewed while simultaneously completing a cognitive impairment task. The CI generated more contacts than the control interview. However, when the cognitive impairment task was completed, the CI and the control interview performed similarly. We recommend the CI be considered as an alternative to the control interview, particularly if the interviewee is not temporarily impaired due to distraction or illness.
为了阻止传染病(例如埃博拉病毒)的传播,流行病学家会对感染个体进行接触者追踪访谈(CTIs),了解他们可能感染的接触者。然而,这些接触者追踪访谈可能容易出现致命的遗漏错误。一种有前途的最大程度提高回忆的技术是认知访谈(CI),它基于心理学理论。在本研究中,参与者想象自己感染了脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎,并在控制访谈或 CI 中报告了过去三天的接触者。为了模拟与疾病相关的认知障碍,一半的参与者在接受采访的同时同时完成一项认知障碍任务。CI 比控制访谈产生了更多的联系人。然而,当完成认知障碍任务时,CI 和控制访谈的表现相似。我们建议将 CI 作为控制访谈的替代方案,特别是如果受访者没有因分心或疾病而暂时受损。